• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于综合基因组分析推荐的抗癌药物超说明书用药的日本全国民意调查。

The nationwide survey of Japanese public opinion about off-label use of anticancer drugs recommended by comprehensive genomic profiling.

作者信息

Matsubara Junichi, Mukai Kumi, Muto Manabu

机构信息

Department of Clinical Oncology, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Shogoinkawahara-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Clin Oncol. 2025 Jul 18. doi: 10.1007/s10147-025-02809-y.

DOI:10.1007/s10147-025-02809-y
PMID:40679666
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP)-guided precision medicine enables identification of molecular-based recommended therapy (MBRT), including off-label uses of anticancer drugs for rare genomic alterations. However, in Japan, access to such off-label drugs is limited despite their potential therapeutic benefits. This study aimed to investigate public attitudes toward off-label use of anticancer drugs in Japan.

METHODS

A nationwide online survey was conducted in Japan from February 15 to 19, 2024, targeting cancer patients (CA), medical professionals (MP), and non-cancer volunteers (non-CA) aged 40 + years. This included explanatory materials on CGP and MBRT, and questionnaires assessing willingness to use off-label drugs in various cost scenarios.

RESULTS

A total of 1,261 responses were analyzed: 419 CA, 430 MP, and 412 non-CA participants (median age: 59, range 40-89). Approximately 80% of MPs reported high comprehension of the explanatory materials (Top-2 box on a 5-point Likert scale), compared with ~ 60% of CA and < 50% of non-CA participants. Willingness to use off-label drugs (Top-2 box) was as follows: "No cost burden": 51% CA, 62% MP, and 50% non-CA; "Cost ¥200,000 per month (approximately $US1,300)": 15% CA, 31% MP, and 15% non-CA; "Cost ¥1,000,000 per month (approximately $US6,700)": 6% CA, 16% MP, and 4% non-CA. Higher comprehension of explanatory materials was associated with greater willingness to use off-label drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

Over half of respondents were willing to use off-label anticancer drugs if they were free of charge. However, willingness declined significantly with cost. Policy frameworks are needed in Japan to improve access to CGP-guided off-label therapies.

摘要

背景

综合基因组分析(CGP)指导下的精准医疗能够确定基于分子的推荐疗法(MBRT),包括针对罕见基因组改变的抗癌药物的非标签使用。然而,在日本,尽管这些非标签药物具有潜在的治疗益处,但获取此类药物仍受到限制。本研究旨在调查日本公众对抗癌药物非标签使用的态度。

方法

2024年2月15日至19日在日本进行了一项全国性在线调查,目标人群为40岁及以上的癌症患者(CA)、医学专业人员(MP)和非癌症志愿者(非CA)。调查内容包括关于CGP和MBRT的解释材料,以及评估在各种成本情况下使用非标签药物意愿的问卷。

结果

共分析了1261份回复:419名癌症患者、430名医学专业人员和412名非癌症志愿者(中位年龄:59岁,范围40 - 89岁)。约80%的医学专业人员表示对解释材料理解程度高(5分李克特量表中的前两档),相比之下,约60%的癌症患者和不到50%的非癌症志愿者达到这一水平。使用非标签药物的意愿(前两档)如下:“无成本负担”:51%的癌症患者、62%的医学专业人员和50%的非癌症志愿者;“每月成本20万日元(约1300美元)”:15%的癌症患者、31%的医学专业人员和15%的非癌症志愿者;“每月成本100万日元(约6700美元)”:6%的癌症患者、16%的医学专业人员和4%的非癌症志愿者。对解释材料理解程度越高,使用非标签药物的意愿越强。

结论

超过一半的受访者表示如果抗癌药物免费,愿意使用非标签药物。然而,随着成本增加,意愿显著下降。日本需要政策框架来改善获取CGP指导下的非标签疗法的机会。

相似文献

1
The nationwide survey of Japanese public opinion about off-label use of anticancer drugs recommended by comprehensive genomic profiling.关于综合基因组分析推荐的抗癌药物超说明书用药的日本全国民意调查。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2025 Jul 18. doi: 10.1007/s10147-025-02809-y.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
4
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
5
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
6
Summary of the comparative effectiveness review on off-label use of atypical antipsychotics.非典型抗精神病药物超说明书使用的比较有效性评价综述
J Manag Care Pharm. 2012 Jun;18(5 Suppl B):S1-20. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2012.18.S5-B.1.
7
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
8
Public preferences for health and non-health outcomes of Universal Basic Income and alternative income-based policies: A mixed-method feasibility study.公众对普遍基本收入和其他基于收入的政策的健康与非健康结果的偏好:一项混合方法可行性研究。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Jul 30:1-26. doi: 10.3310/ALDS8846.
9
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
10
Off-label drug use in oncology: a systematic review of literature.肿瘤学中的药物非标签使用:文献系统综述
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2017 Jun;42(3):251-258. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12507. Epub 2017 Feb 5.

本文引用的文献

1
First-Line Genomic Profiling in Previously Untreated Advanced Solid Tumors for Identification of Targeted Therapy Opportunities.一线治疗前未治疗的晚期实体瘤的基因组分析,以确定靶向治疗机会。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2323336. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.23336.
2
The NCI-MATCH trial: lessons for precision oncology.NCI-MATCH 试验:精准肿瘤学的经验教训。
Nat Med. 2023 Jun;29(6):1349-1357. doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02379-4. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
3
C-CAT: The National Datacenter for Cancer Genomic Medicine in Japan.C-CAT:日本癌症基因组医学国家数据中心。
Cancer Discov. 2022 Nov 2;12(11):2509-2515. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-22-0417.
4
The NCI-MATCH: A National, Collaborative Precision Oncology Trial for Diverse Tumor Histologies.NCI-MATCH:一项针对多种肿瘤组织学类型的全国性协作精准肿瘤学试验。
Cancer Cell. 2021 Jan 11;39(1):22-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2020.12.021.
5
Classification, Ontology, and Precision Medicine.分类、本体论与精准医学。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Oct 11;379(15):1452-1462. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1615014.