Fernández-Alvarez Verónica, Linares-Sánchez Miriam, López Fernando, Rinaldo Alessandra, Ferlito Alfio
Vascular and Endovascular Department, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, 33011, Oviedo, Spain.
Vascular and Endovascular Department, Hospital Universitario de Cabueñes, 33394, Gijón, Spain.
Cardiol Ther. 2025 Jul 19. doi: 10.1007/s40119-025-00428-2.
Subclinical atherosclerosis precedes overt cardiovascular disease and can be detected through surrogate markers such as arterial stiffness (AS) and carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT). This review examines the diagnostic and prognostic roles of AS and CIMT, highlighting their potential to improve cardiovascular risk stratification. Although traditional risk prediction models remain the cornerstone of primary prevention, they often fail to identify individuals at risk who lack conventional risk factors. Emerging evidence suggests that integrating CIMT and AS into risk assessment may improve the reclassification of individuals with intermediate risk. However, their routine use remains controversial due to methodological heterogeneity, variability in predictive value, and the prioritization of alternative imaging biomarkers such as carotid plaque or coronary artery calcium (CAC). This article critically assesses the strengths and limitations of AS and CIMT, discussing their potential utility as biomarkers, explores their application into clinical practice, and comprehensively summarizes the latest research.
亚临床动脉粥样硬化先于显性心血管疾病出现,可通过诸如动脉僵硬度(AS)和颈动脉内膜中层厚度(CIMT)等替代标志物检测出来。本综述探讨了AS和CIMT的诊断及预后作用,强调了它们在改善心血管风险分层方面的潜力。尽管传统风险预测模型仍是一级预防的基石,但它们常常无法识别出缺乏传统风险因素的高危个体。新出现的证据表明,将CIMT和AS纳入风险评估可能会改善对中度风险个体的重新分类。然而,由于方法学的异质性、预测价值的变异性以及诸如颈动脉斑块或冠状动脉钙化(CAC)等替代成像生物标志物的优先性,它们的常规使用仍存在争议。本文批判性地评估了AS和CIMT的优势与局限性,讨论了它们作为生物标志物的潜在效用,探讨了它们在临床实践中的应用,并全面总结了最新研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025-6-12
JDR Clin Trans Res. 2025-7
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024-1-8
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2024-1
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2024-6-1
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2023-10-1