Teimourpour Amir, Amini-Kafiabad Sedigheh, Nazemi Amir Masoud, O'Brien Sheila F, Maghsudlu Mahtab
Biological Products and Blood Safety Research Center, High Institute for Research and Education in Transfusion Medicine, Tehran, Iran.
Blood Transfusion Research Center, High Institute for Research and Education in Transfusion Medicine, Tehran, Iran.
Vox Sang. 2025 Jul 20. doi: 10.1111/vox.70080.
Blood donor selection is crucial for ensuring safe blood supply. A well-designed donor selection system helps in maintaining donor engagement by minimizing unnecessary exclusion while safeguarding transfusion safety. We aimed to assess the risk of transfusion-transmitted infections (TTIs) among high-risk deferred donors to evaluate deferral criteria efficacy.
This study included data from volunteers who were temporarily deferred because of bloodletting, high-risk sexual contact, tattooing, endoscopy and needle sticks, as well as from eligible donors who donated blood over a 12-month period. These donors were followed up for 4 years. The results of infectious confirmatory tests, including hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), of returned donors who donated blood were extracted from the database. Risk ratio (RR) of TTI was calculated to compare the risk between eligible and deferred donors.
The data from 601,177 returned, deferred and eligible blood donors were analysed. The risk of TTIs was significantly higher in the deferred group compared to eligible donor group (RR: 3.58; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.68-4.80; p <0.001). The risk of TTIs was significantly higher in those deferred for bloodletting (RR = 4.85; 95% CI: 3.41-6.91; p < 0.001), tattooing (RR = 3.53; 95% CI: 1.26-3.83; p = 0.029) and high-risk sexual contact (RR = 2.19; 95% CI: 1.26-3.83; p = 0.011).
Individuals with a history of bloodletting, tattooing or high-risk sexual contact were at a higher risk of HBV and HCV infection, highlighting the effectiveness of donor selection procedures. Endoscopy and needle stick injuries were not associated with an increased TTI risk, emphasizing the need for further research to reassess these deferral criteria. Blood centres should monitor the efficacy of donor selection criteria while emphasizing proper donor selection and counselling.
献血者筛选对于确保安全的血液供应至关重要。精心设计的献血者筛选系统有助于通过尽量减少不必要的排除来维持献血者参与度,同时保障输血安全。我们旨在评估高危延期献血者中输血传播感染(TTIs)的风险,以评估延期标准的有效性。
本研究纳入了因放血、高危性接触、纹身、内镜检查和针刺而暂时延期的志愿者的数据,以及在12个月期间献血的合格献血者的数据。对这些献血者进行了4年的随访。从数据库中提取了献血的回访献血者的感染确诊检测结果,包括乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)、丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)和人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)。计算TTI的风险比(RR)以比较合格献血者和延期献血者之间的风险。
分析了601177名回访、延期和合格献血者的数据。与合格献血者组相比,延期组的TTIs风险显著更高(RR:3.58;95%置信区间[CI]:2.68 - 4.80;p < 0.001)。因放血延期的献血者的TTIs风险显著更高(RR = 4.85;95% CI:3.41 - 6.91;p < 0.001),纹身(RR = 3.53;95% CI:1.26 - 3.83;p = 0.029)和高危性接触(RR = 2.19;95% CI:1.26 - 3.83;p = 0.011)。
有放血、纹身或高危性接触史的个体感染HBV和HCV的风险更高,凸显了献血者筛选程序的有效性。内镜检查和针刺伤与TTI风险增加无关,强调需要进一步研究以重新评估这些延期标准。血液中心应监测献血者筛选标准的有效性,同时强调正确的献血者筛选和咨询。