• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

让患者合作伙伴参与确定房颤研究重点:患者参与日的结果

Engaging patient partners to identify research priorities for atrial fibrillation: Results from a patient engagement day.

作者信息

Carroll Sandra L, McGillion Michael, Abelson Julia, Berkesse Alexandre, Healey Jeff S

机构信息

School of Nursing, McMaster University - 2J20, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada.

Population Health Research Institute, 237 Barton Street East, Hamilton, Ontario L8L 2X2, Canada.

出版信息

PEC Innov. 2025 Jun 27;7:100417. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100417. eCollection 2025 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100417
PMID:40686554
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12273571/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We describe a Patient Engagement Day from the Canadian Stroke Prevention Network (C-SPIN). Patients and family members were engaged as patient partners to generate and prioritize future direction for Atrial Fibrillation (AF) research.

METHODS

A facilitated group discussion methodology was used that included a nominal group brainstorming and decision-making technique designed to foster participation and idea generation.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patient partners attended. Priorities related to: 1) need for a curative focus and not new medication (84 %), 2) identification of triggers (53 %), and 3) home-based/remote monitoring (53 %). Use of the Public and Patient Engagement Evaluation Tool (PPEET) found patient partners understood the intent of the day, with its objectives being met. Findings highlighted knowledge gaps by patient partners that were previously thought to be understood.

CONCLUSION

Patient partners could benefit from more focused education about atrial fibrillation. Notably, the priorities identified by patient partners were new to the research team, reinforcing the importance of engaging with the population who will be impacted by the research.

INNOVATION

Little research has been undertaken examining patient partner priorities regarding atrial fibrillation research. This work highlights patient partners' interest in providing input and shaping future research endeavors.

摘要

目的

我们描述了加拿大卒中预防网络(C-SPIN)举办的患者参与日活动。患者和家庭成员作为患者合作伙伴参与其中,为心房颤动(AF)研究确定未来方向并排出优先顺序。

方法

采用了一种引导式小组讨论方法,其中包括一种名义小组头脑风暴和决策技术,旨在促进参与和想法产生。

结果

24名患者合作伙伴参加了活动。优先事项包括:1)需要关注治愈方法而非新药(84%),2)识别触发因素(53%),以及3)家庭/远程监测(53%)。使用公众和患者参与评估工具(PPEET)发现患者合作伙伴理解了当天活动的意图,且活动目标得以实现。研究结果突出了患者合作伙伴之前被认为已理解的知识差距。

结论

患者合作伙伴可能会从关于心房颤动的更有针对性的教育中受益。值得注意的是,患者合作伙伴确定的优先事项对研究团队来说是新的,这强化了与将受研究影响的人群进行互动的重要性。

创新

关于患者合作伙伴对心房颤动研究的优先事项的研究很少。这项工作突出了患者合作伙伴在提供意见和塑造未来研究工作方面的兴趣。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05c1/12273571/47fecca96ad4/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05c1/12273571/47fecca96ad4/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05c1/12273571/47fecca96ad4/ga1.jpg

相似文献

1
Engaging patient partners to identify research priorities for atrial fibrillation: Results from a patient engagement day.让患者合作伙伴参与确定房颤研究重点:患者参与日的结果
PEC Innov. 2025 Jun 27;7:100417. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100417. eCollection 2025 Dec.
2
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
3
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
4
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
5
Curative catheter ablation in atrial fibrillation and typical atrial flutter: systematic review and economic evaluation.心房颤动和典型心房扑动的根治性导管消融术:系统评价与经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Nov;12(34):iii-iv, xi-xiii, 1-198. doi: 10.3310/hta12340.
6
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
7
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
8
Systematic review and cost-effectiveness evaluation of 'pill-in-the-pocket' strategy for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation compared to episodic in-hospital treatment or continuous antiarrhythmic drug therapy.“口袋里的药丸”策略与偶发性院内治疗或持续性抗心律失常药物治疗相比,用于阵发性心房颤动的系统评价和成本效益评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Jun;14(31):iii-iv, 1-75. doi: 10.3310/hta14310.
9
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
10
Positive effects of speech and language therapy group interventions in primary progressive aphasia: A systematic review.言语语言治疗小组干预对原发性进行性失语症的积极影响:系统评价。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Sep-Oct;59(5):1832-1849. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13031. Epub 2024 Apr 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Patients' experiences across the trajectory of atrial fibrillation: A qualitative systematic review.患者在心房颤动病程中的体验:一项定性系统评价。
Health Expect. 2022 Jun;25(3):869-884. doi: 10.1111/hex.13451. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
2
Engaging Patients in Real-World Evidence: An Atrial Fibrillation Patient Advisory Board Case Example.让患者参与真实世界证据收集:心房颤动患者咨询委员会案例
Patient. 2021 Mar;14(2):295-300. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00479-8. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
3
Preparing for patient partnership: A scoping review of patient partner engagement and evaluation in research.
准备患者合作:患者伙伴参与和评估研究的范围综述。
Health Expect. 2020 Jun;23(3):523-539. doi: 10.1111/hex.13040. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
4
Patient and Public Engagement in Integrated Knowledge Translation Research: Are we there yet?患者及公众参与整合知识转化研究:我们做到了吗?
Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Feb 12;5:8. doi: 10.1186/s40900-019-0139-1. eCollection 2019.
5
Stroke in the 21 Century: A Snapshot of the Burden, Epidemiology, and Quality of Life.21世纪的中风:负担、流行病学及生活质量概览
Stroke Res Treat. 2018 Nov 27;2018:3238165. doi: 10.1155/2018/3238165. eCollection 2018.
6
Assessment of atrial fibrillation patients' education needs from patient and clinician perspectives: A qualitative descriptive study.从患者和临床医生的角度评估心房颤动患者的教育需求:一项定性描述性研究。
Thromb Res. 2019 Jan;173:109-116. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2018.11.015. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
7
Questioning patient engagement: research scientists' perceptions of the challenges of patient engagement in a cardiovascular research network.对患者参与度的质疑:研究科学家对心血管研究网络中患者参与挑战的看法。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017 Sep 13;11:1573-1583. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S135457. eCollection 2017.
8
Management of newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation in an outpatient clinic setting-patient's perspectives and experiences.初诊心房颤动患者的门诊管理——患者的观点和体验。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Feb;27(3-4):601-611. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13951. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
9
'What else can I do?': Insights from atrial fibrillation patient communication online.“我还能做什么?”:房颤患者在线交流的见解
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2017 Mar;16(3):194-200. doi: 10.1177/1474515116678103. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
10
Patient and Stakeholder Engagement in the PCORI Pilot Projects: Description and Lessons Learned.患者及利益相关者参与患者为中心的结果研究所试点项目:描述与经验教训
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Jan;31(1):13-21. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3450-z. Epub 2015 Jul 10.