• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用UNCseq靶向DNA测序技术研究子宫内膜癌基因组学和预后的种族差异。

Racial differences in endometrial cancer genomics and outcomes using UNCseq targeted DNA sequencing.

作者信息

Newton Meredith A, Merker Jason D, Gong Weida, Patil Sushant, Tan Xianming, Cocoran David L, Pfefferle Adam D, Hayward Michele C, Broaddus Russell, Nichols Hazel B, Olshan Andrew F, Weissman Bernard, Keku Temitope O, Bae-Jump Victoria

机构信息

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, United States.

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, United States.

出版信息

Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2025 Jun 25;60:101795. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2025.101795. eCollection 2025 Aug.

DOI:10.1016/j.gore.2025.101795
PMID:40687919
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12274730/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To use an institution-sponsored targeted sequencing effort to characterize the genomic differences in endometrioid and serous endometrial cancers (ECs) between Black and White patients and to investigate the impact on clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Tumor tissue from Black and White patients with serous or endometrioid ECs underwent DNA sequencing using the UNCseq panel. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed for all patients and within histologic and molecular subcategories using clinicopathologic data from the medical record.

RESULTS

Tumor tissue from 200 endometrioid or serous ECs were included, with 169 tumors (84.5 %) from White and 31 (15.5 %) from Black patients. Black patients more frequently had serous (. endometrioid, p < 0.0001) and TP53 mutant (by modified TCGA subclassification, p = 0.01) tumors, compared to White patients. Over a median follow-up of 62.4 months, PFS and OS were significantly shorter for Black patients (p < 0.04). Modified TCGA categorized TP53 mutant tumors had the worst PFS and OS (p < 0.04). Of serous tumors, 25.0 % were categorized as POLE, MSI or TP53 wild type, whereas 11.6 % of endometrioid tumors were categorized as TP53 mutant. White patients more often had somatic mutations in or (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Several potential molecular drivers of the racial disparity in EC were identified. Future studies are warranted to validate the clinical impact of these findings amongst a larger diverse study population and evaluate their potential as clinically actionable targets in treatment.

摘要

目的

利用一项机构资助的靶向测序研究,描述黑人和白人患者子宫内膜样癌和浆液性子宫内膜癌(EC)的基因组差异,并研究其对临床结局的影响。

方法

使用UNCseq检测板对黑人和白人浆液性或子宫内膜样EC患者的肿瘤组织进行DNA测序。利用病历中的临床病理数据,评估所有患者以及组织学和分子亚类患者的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。

结果

纳入了200例子宫内膜样或浆液性EC的肿瘤组织,其中169例(84.5%)来自白人患者,31例(15.5%)来自黑人患者。与白人患者相比,黑人患者的浆液性肿瘤(.子宫内膜样肿瘤,p<0.0001)和TP53突变肿瘤(根据改良的TCGA亚分类,p=0.01)更为常见。在中位随访62.4个月期间,黑人患者的PFS和OS显著缩短(p<0.04)。改良的TCGA分类中,TP53突变肿瘤的PFS和OS最差(p<0.04)。浆液性肿瘤中,25.0%被分类为POLE、微卫星高度不稳定(MSI)或TP53野生型,而11.6%的子宫内膜样肿瘤被分类为TP53突变型。白人患者的或体细胞突变更为常见(p<0.05)。

结论

确定了EC种族差异的几个潜在分子驱动因素。未来有必要开展研究,在更多样化的研究人群中验证这些发现的临床影响,并评估其作为治疗中临床可操作靶点的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15d7/12274730/bc684ee5d6a7/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15d7/12274730/54b9cbc0ac81/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15d7/12274730/24747a71df50/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15d7/12274730/bc684ee5d6a7/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15d7/12274730/54b9cbc0ac81/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15d7/12274730/24747a71df50/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15d7/12274730/bc684ee5d6a7/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Racial differences in endometrial cancer genomics and outcomes using UNCseq targeted DNA sequencing.使用UNCseq靶向DNA测序技术研究子宫内膜癌基因组学和预后的种族差异。
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2025 Jun 25;60:101795. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2025.101795. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
The use of irinotecan, oxaliplatin and raltitrexed for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation.伊立替康、奥沙利铂和雷替曲塞用于治疗晚期结直肠癌:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 May;12(15):iii-ix, xi-162. doi: 10.3310/hta12150.
3
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
5
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
6
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
7
Optimisation of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for untreated Hodgkin lymphoma patients with respect to second malignant neoplasms, overall and progression-free survival: individual participant data analysis.未治疗的霍奇金淋巴瘤患者化疗和放疗在第二原发性恶性肿瘤、总生存期和无进展生存期方面的优化:个体参与者数据分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 13;9(9):CD008814. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008814.pub2.
8
Can a Liquid Biopsy Detect Circulating Tumor DNA With Low-passage Whole-genome Sequencing in Patients With a Sarcoma? A Pilot Evaluation.液体活检能否通过低深度全基因组测序检测肉瘤患者的循环肿瘤DNA?一项初步评估。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):39-48. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003161. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
9
Taxane monotherapy regimens for the treatment of recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.紫杉烷类单药治疗方案用于复发性上皮性卵巢癌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 12;7(7):CD008766. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008766.pub3.
10
Nivolumab for adults with Hodgkin's lymphoma (a rapid review using the software RobotReviewer).纳武单抗用于成人霍奇金淋巴瘤(使用RobotReviewer软件进行的快速综述)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 12;7(7):CD012556. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012556.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer statistics, 2024.2024年癌症统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 Jan-Feb;74(1):12-49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21820. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
2
PIK3CA mutation status, progression and survival in advanced HR + /HER2- breast cancer: a meta-analysis of published clinical trials.PIK3CA 突变状态、进展和生存与晚期 HR +/HER2- 乳腺癌:已发表临床试验的荟萃分析。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Sep 21;22(1):1002. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-10078-5.
3
Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, Part 1: National Cancer Statistics.《全国癌症状况年度报告》第 1 部分:国家癌症统计。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Nov 29;113(12):1648-1669. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djab131.
4
Histopathologic, Genetic and Molecular Characterization of Endometrial Cancer Racial Disparity.子宫内膜癌种族差异的组织病理学、遗传学和分子特征
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Apr 15;13(8):1900. doi: 10.3390/cancers13081900.
5
The TCGA Molecular Classification of Endometrial Cancer and Its Possible Impact on Adjuvant Treatment Decisions.TCGA子宫内膜癌分子分类及其对辅助治疗决策的潜在影响。
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Mar 23;13(6):1478. doi: 10.3390/cancers13061478.
6
PORTEC-4a: international randomized trial of molecular profile-based adjuvant treatment for women with high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer.PORTEC-4a:基于分子谱的辅助治疗用于中高危子宫内膜癌患者的国际随机试验。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Dec;30(12):2002-2007. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001929. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
7
Molecular Classification of the PORTEC-3 Trial for High-Risk Endometrial Cancer: Impact on Prognosis and Benefit From Adjuvant Therapy.PORTEC-3 试验高危子宫内膜癌的分子分类:对预后的影响和辅助治疗的获益。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Oct 10;38(29):3388-3397. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.00549. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
8
The role of histology on endometrial cancer survival disparities in diverse Florida.佛罗里达州不同人群中组织学对子宫内膜癌生存差异的作用。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 23;15(7):e0236402. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236402. eCollection 2020.
9
Prognostic Biomarkers in Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.子宫内膜癌的预后生物标志物:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2020 Jun 17;9(6):1900. doi: 10.3390/jcm9061900.
10
Clinicopathological and molecular characterisation of 'multiple-classifier' endometrial carcinomas.“多分类器”子宫内膜癌的临床病理和分子特征。
J Pathol. 2020 Mar;250(3):312-322. doi: 10.1002/path.5373. Epub 2020 Jan 12.