Ross Robert, Day Andrew G, Stotz Paula J, Wade Samantha, Cooke Robert, Miller Erin, Liberatore Nick, Lamarche Benoit
School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
School of Medicine, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2025 Jul 5;46:101519. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101519. eCollection 2025 Aug.
Physical inactivity and low levels of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF, VOpeak) are major threats to public health In response, leading health authorities worldwide recommend that all adults accumulate 150 min/wk of moderate to-vigorous physical activity. However, we and others have demonstrated an extraordinary inter-individual variability in CRF response to standardized exercise wherein a substantial number of adults may not improve CRF beyond day-to-day variability. Whether CRF response to first line therapy is a permanent feature of the individual or can be altered by increasing exercise dose is unknown. We will perform a single-centre, two-phased, randomized controlled trial. In Phase I we will randomly assign previously inactive, adult men and women between 25 and 65 years in a 1:9 ratio to a no-exercise wait-list control, or a low amount, low intensity (∼150 min/wk) group for 16 weeks. In Phase II (16 weeks), participants randomized to exercise in phase I will be re-randomized to 1 of 3 exercise groups: 1) the same low amount, low intensity; 2) low amount, high intensity, or 3) high amount, high intensity. The primary outcome is CRF. Our primary question is, after 16 weeks of ∼150 min/wk of moderate intensity exercise, does increasing exercise intensity or exercise amount for an additional 16 weeks improve CRF differently depending on the response to exercise during the first 16 weeks? The findings will provide first evidence and immense opportunity for development of a more personalized approach to exercise that recognizes individual response variability.
clinicaltrials. gov identifier: NCT05496751.
缺乏身体活动和低水平的心肺适能(CRF,最大摄氧量)是对公众健康的主要威胁。对此,全球主要卫生当局建议所有成年人每周累计进行150分钟中等至剧烈强度的身体活动。然而,我们和其他人已经证明,在对标准化运动的CRF反应中存在巨大的个体间差异,其中相当数量的成年人可能无法使CRF改善超过日常波动水平。CRF对一线治疗的反应是个体的永久特征还是可以通过增加运动剂量来改变尚不清楚。我们将进行一项单中心、两阶段、随机对照试验。在第一阶段,我们将以1:9的比例将25至65岁之前不活动的成年男性和女性随机分配到无运动等待名单对照组或低量、低强度(约150分钟/周)组,为期16周。在第二阶段(16周),在第一阶段随机分配到运动组的参与者将被重新随机分配到3个运动组中的1个:1)相同的低量、低强度;2)低量、高强度,或3)高量、高强度。主要结局是CRF。我们的主要问题是,在进行16周每周约150分钟中等强度运动后,再增加16周的运动强度或运动量,根据前16周对运动的反应,对CRF的改善是否会有所不同?这些发现将为开发一种更个性化的运动方法提供首个证据和巨大机会,该方法能够认识到个体反应的变异性。
clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT05496751。