Zhu Yan, Wu Shikai, Ma Feiyan, Uemura Takehiro, Hu Nanlin, Wang Chan
Department of Medical Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
J Thorac Dis. 2025 Jun 30;17(6):4159-4176. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2025-868. Epub 2025 Jun 23.
Randomized clinical studies have demonstrated that programmed cell death protein (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors can provide significant survival benefit to patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the real-world application of inhibitors is complex, necessitating a comprehensive summary of their efficacy and adverse effects. Our study is specifically designed to reach this objective.
We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients with locally advanced or stage IV NSCLC who received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors as monotherapy or in combination with other antitumor drugs at a single center.
Among 123 patients, the median progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) were 24.0 weeks, 42.3%, and 66.7%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 2-3, irAEs occurrence, tumor cell proportion score (TPS) ≥50%, and non-Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) driver gene alterations as factors significantly associated with PFS. Landmark analysis was conducted to minimize immortal time bias and revealed the association of irAEs with efficacy. Of the patients, 39.8% experienced irAEs, with skin-related irAEs being the most common (22.0%), followed by thyroid dysfunction (13.0%) and pneumonia (12.2%). Approximately 16.3% of patients temporarily or permanently discontinued immunotherapy due to irAEs. No deaths were attributed to irAEs.
Real-world data on the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with advanced NSCLC were generally consistent with results from randomized clinical trials. ECOG PS 2-3, non-KRAS driver gene alterations, TPS ≥50%, and irAEs were found to be significantly associated with PFS. Landmark analysis further demonstrated that the occurrence of irAEs was correlated with better efficacy of immunotherapy.
随机临床研究表明,程序性细胞死亡蛋白(PD-1)和程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)抑制剂可为晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者带来显著的生存获益。然而,抑制剂在现实世界中的应用较为复杂,有必要对其疗效和不良反应进行全面总结。我们的研究专门为此目的而设计。
我们回顾性分析了在单中心接受PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂单药治疗或与其他抗肿瘤药物联合治疗的局部晚期或IV期NSCLC患者的疗效和免疫相关不良事件(irAE)。
123例患者中,中位无进展生存期(PFS)、总缓解率(ORR)和疾病控制率(DCR)分别为24.0周、42.3%和66.7%。多因素分析确定东部肿瘤协作组体能状态(ECOG PS)2-3、irAE发生、肿瘤细胞比例评分(TPS)≥50%以及非 Kirsten 大鼠肉瘤(KRAS)驱动基因改变是与PFS显著相关的因素。进行了标志性分析以尽量减少不朽时间偏倚,并揭示了irAE与疗效的关联。患者中,39.8%发生了irAE,其中皮肤相关irAE最为常见(22.0%),其次是甲状腺功能障碍(13.0%)和肺炎(12.2%)。约16.3%的患者因irAE暂时或永久停止免疫治疗。没有死亡归因于irAE。
PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂在晚期NSCLC患者中的疗效和安全性的真实世界数据与随机临床试验结果总体一致。发现ECOG PS 2-3、非KRAS驱动基因改变、TPS≥50%和irAE与PFS显著相关。标志性分析进一步表明,irAE的发生与免疫治疗的更好疗效相关。