Suppr超能文献

检验性认知清单的可靠性及效度证据来源。

Examining the reliability and sources of validity evidence of the sexual cognitions checklist.

作者信息

Pérez-Amorós Carlos, Sierra Juan Carlos, Cervilla Oscar, Sánchez-Fuentes María Del Mar

机构信息

Mind, Brain and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), Facultad de Psicología, University of Granada, Campus Universitario de Cartuja s/n., Granada 18011, Spain.

Departament of Psychology, University of Jaén, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2025 Jul-Sep;25(3):100605. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2025.100605. Epub 2025 Jul 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: The Sexual Cognitions Checklist (SCC) is the only measure that distinguishes and assesses both positive (PSC) and negative sexual cognitions (NSC). This study aimed to deepen the psychometric properties of its Spanish version by testing invariance, reliability, differences in frequency, associations with sexual functioning in solitary masturbation and sexual relationships and presenting standard scores.

METHOD

A total of 2004 Spanish cisgender heterosexual adults (48.1% men, 51.9% women) aged 18 to 79 years ( = 38.23; = 13.70), distributed across age groups (18-34, 35-49 and 50 or older) participated. Analyses included measurement invariance, McDonald's omega, MANCOVAs, correlations, partial correlations, and regression models. Norms for positive sexual cognitions were generated by gender and age.

RESULTS

Strict invariance was confirmed across educational level, relationship status, and relationship length, and partial strict invariance for gender on both the SCC-PSC and SCC-NSC scales. Age showed strict invariance in the SCC-PSC scale and configural in the SCC-NSC scale. The subscales showed good internal consistency. Frequency differences emerged, notably by gender, with men scoring higher in positive and women in negative sexual cognitions. Positive sexual cognitions were positively associated with sexual functioning, negative ones showed negative and weaker associations.

CONCLUSIONS

The Spanish SCC version demonstrates reliability of its scores and provides sources of validity evidence for the interpretation of its scores, including associations with sexual functioning and measurement invariance across groups, enabling group comparisons. The availability of norms for positive sexual cognitions further supports its application in clinical settings. Future studies should include diverse populations and individuals with diagnosed sexual dysfunctions.

摘要

背景/目的:性认知清单(SCC)是唯一区分和评估积极(PSC)和消极性认知(NSC)的测量工具。本研究旨在通过测试不变性、信度、频率差异、与独自手淫及性关系中性功能的关联并呈现标准分数,来深化其西班牙语版本的心理测量特性。

方法

共有2004名年龄在18至79岁(平均年龄 = 38.23岁;标准差 = 13.70)的西班牙顺性别异性恋成年人(男性占48.1%,女性占51.9%)参与,他们分布在不同年龄组(18 - 34岁、35 - 49岁和50岁及以上)。分析包括测量不变性、麦克唐纳ω系数、多变量协方差分析、相关性分析、偏相关性分析和回归模型。生成了按性别和年龄划分的积极性认知规范。

结果

在教育水平、恋爱状况和恋爱时长方面证实了严格不变性,在SCC - PSC和SCC - NSC量表上性别具有部分严格不变性。年龄在SCC - PSC量表上显示严格不变性,在SCC - NSC量表上显示构型不变性。各分量表显示出良好的内部一致性。出现了频率差异,尤其是按性别划分,男性在积极性认知方面得分更高,女性在消极性认知方面得分更高。积极性认知与性功能呈正相关,消极性认知呈负相关且相关性较弱。

结论

西班牙语版的SCC展示了其分数的可靠性,并为分数解释提供了效度证据来源,包括与性功能的关联以及跨组测量不变性,从而能够进行组间比较。积极性认知规范的可用性进一步支持了其在临床环境中的应用。未来的研究应纳入不同人群以及诊断为性功能障碍的个体。

相似文献

1
Examining the reliability and sources of validity evidence of the sexual cognitions checklist.检验性认知清单的可靠性及效度证据来源。
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2025 Jul-Sep;25(3):100605. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2025.100605. Epub 2025 Jul 7.

本文引用的文献

6
Evidence for Test Validation: A Guide for Practitioners.验证测试的证据:从业者指南。
Psicothema. 2023 Aug;35(3):217-226. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2022.477.
9
Sexual fantasy research: A contemporary review.性幻想研究:当代综述。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2023 Feb;49:101496. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101496. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
10
Attachment Anxiety, Rape Myth Acceptance, and Sexual Compliance.依恋焦虑、强奸谬论接受度和性顺从。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Apr;37(7-8):NP4626-NP4639. doi: 10.1177/0886260520948526. Epub 2020 Aug 12.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验