Gåsvær Jo Inge, Heldal Ilona, Sudmann Tobba
Department of Health and Function, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway.
Carasent ASA, Oslo, Norway.
Digit Health. 2025 Jul 17;11:20552076251353367. doi: 10.1177/20552076251353367. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
This paper presents the results of a critical ethnography study on the design and implementation of Ad Voca, a web platform for rehabilitation purposes that can be integrated with the electronic health record. The process involved technologists and healthcare personnel collaborating to harness the platform's design, amendments, and implementation strategies.
The design and implementation of a web platform for rehabilitation is an eminent case for an explorative action learning study. The empirical material is compiled through participant observation, analysis of written sources, and interviews. The theory of wicked problems is used as an analytical lens.
New challenges emerged throughout the project period. Negotiations related to trade-offs between clinical and IT capabilities, decision-making on project goals, resource allocations, priority setting between re-design or new design, and compatibility with other IT solutions for healthcare. Participants were creative, flexible, conservators of professional standards, and appreciated mono- and cross-professional work divisions. When stakeholders were brought together across technology and healthcare settings, suggestions about what was needed to be fit-for-purpose-design and to secure user satisfaction were abundant. Leaders play a key role in these processes.
Good intentions and collaborative efforts must be supported by systems thinking, management involvement, and critical appreciation of the conditions for collaboration, commercial value, and clinical value. Systems thinking and adaptive strategies relieve front-line workers (healthcare and IT teams) from the responsibility of commercial and end-user success, facilitate creativity, and contribute to new solutions and perseverance in design processes.
本文介绍了一项关于Ad Voca(一个可与电子健康记录集成的康复用途网络平台)设计与实施的批判性人种志研究结果。该过程涉及技术专家和医护人员合作,以利用该平台的设计、修订和实施策略。
康复网络平台的设计与实施是探索性行动学习研究的一个突出案例。实证材料通过参与观察、书面资料分析和访谈进行汇编。棘手问题理论被用作分析视角。
在整个项目期间出现了新的挑战。涉及临床和信息技术能力之间权衡的谈判、项目目标的决策、资源分配、重新设计或新设计之间的优先级设定,以及与其他医疗信息技术解决方案的兼容性。参与者富有创造力、灵活、维护专业标准,并赞赏单一专业和跨专业的分工。当跨技术和医疗环境召集利益相关者时,关于为实现适用目的设计和确保用户满意度所需条件的建议大量涌现。领导者在这些过程中发挥关键作用。
良好的意图和协作努力必须得到系统思维、管理层参与以及对协作条件、商业价值和临床价值的批判性认识的支持。系统思维和适应性策略使一线工作人员(医疗和信息技术团队)从商业和终端用户成功的责任中解脱出来,促进创造力,并为设计过程中的新解决方案和坚持不懈做出贡献。