Adams Ashley R, Lehman Sarah M, Thompson Erin L, Kaiver Christine M, Lopez Diego, Hawes Samuel W, Lerner Brenda, Lopez-Quintero Catalina, Gonzalez Raul
Department of Psychology, Florida International University.
Department of Epidemiology, Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Florida International University.
Neuropsychology. 2025 Sep;39(6):473-489. doi: 10.1037/neu0001003. Epub 2025 Jul 21.
Cannabis has become increasingly accessible to populations living with chronic health conditions such as HIV. Many people living with HIV are turning to cannabis for symptom relief despite the unclear risks to neurocognitive health. Our study sought to replicate and extend prior research by examining global and domain-specific neurocognitive performance between four groups stratified by use of cannabis (CB; CB+/CB-) and HIV serostatus (HIV+/HIV-).
Our demographically diverse community sample ( = 269) underwent exclusion and inclusion criteria to isolate the effects of cannabis use (CU) and HIV on neurocognition. We explored between-group comparisons of neurocognitive performance, probability of neurocognitive impairment, and interactive effects of CU/HIV serostatus.
Between-group comparisons revealed nonsignificant differences in global or domain-specific neurocognitive performance. However, the CB+/HIV+ group was three times (99% CI [1.18, 9.57]) more likely to be labeled with a memory impairment compared to the control (CB-/HIV-), and the CB+/HIV- group was twice (99% CI [.14, 7.47]) as likely to be labeled with an executive functioning impairment compared to the control. We also identified an interactive effect between the past 30-day CU and HIV serostatus for global ( = -.026, 99% CI [-.04, -.01]) and motor ( = -.052, 99% CI [-.07, -.03]) neurocognitive performance. Findings support a nuanced relationship between CU and HIV, which may partly explain mixed literature.
Although we conclude that recent and heavy CU poses risk of neurocognitive decline among people living with HIVs, this effect is modest. Physicians and patients must weigh a possible decrease in global and motor neurocognition against the severity of symptoms being treated. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
大麻对于感染艾滋病毒等慢性健康状况的人群来说越来越容易获得。许多艾滋病毒感染者不顾其对神经认知健康的风险尚不明朗,转而使用大麻来缓解症状。我们的研究旨在通过检查按大麻使用情况(大麻使用者;大麻使用阳性/大麻使用阴性)和艾滋病毒血清学状态(艾滋病毒阳性/艾滋病毒阴性)分层的四组之间的整体和特定领域神经认知表现,来重复和扩展先前的研究。
我们人口统计学特征多样的社区样本(n = 269)接受了排除和纳入标准,以分离大麻使用(CU)和艾滋病毒对神经认知的影响。我们探讨了神经认知表现的组间比较、神经认知损害的概率以及CU/艾滋病毒血清学状态的交互作用。
组间比较显示,整体或特定领域的神经认知表现没有显著差异。然而,与对照组(大麻使用阴性/艾滋病毒阴性)相比,大麻使用阳性/艾滋病毒阳性组被标记为记忆损害的可能性高出三倍(99%置信区间[1.18, 9.57]),大麻使用阳性/艾滋病毒阴性组被标记为执行功能损害的可能性是对照组的两倍(99%置信区间[.14, 7.47])。我们还确定了过去30天的CU与艾滋病毒血清学状态之间在整体(β = -.026,99%置信区间[-.04, -.01])和运动(β = -.052,99%置信区间[-.07, -.03])神经认知表现方面的交互作用。研究结果支持了CU与艾滋病毒之间的微妙关系,这可能部分解释了文献结果的不一致性。
虽然我们得出结论,近期大量使用大麻会给艾滋病毒感染者带来神经认知衰退的风险,但这种影响较小。医生和患者必须权衡整体和运动神经认知可能的下降与所治疗症状的严重程度。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2025美国心理学会,保留所有权利)