• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

孟加拉国城市地区女性在卫生设施决策中的角色与心理健康之间的关联。

The association between women's decision-making roles in sanitation and mental well-being in urban Bangladesh.

作者信息

Stephan Nicole, Sinharoy Sheela S, Waford Rachel, Patrick Madeleine, Mink Thea, Bhan Tanushree, Ahmed Tanvir, Ahmed Alauddin, Caruso Bethany A

机构信息

Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.

Department of Civil Engineering, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

出版信息

Health Place. 2025 Jul 20;95:103515. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2025.103515.

DOI:10.1016/j.healthplace.2025.103515
PMID:40690832
Abstract

Research indicates that women and girls face gender-specific stressors related to sanitation that affect their mental health, and women's decision-making agency may play a role in this relationship. This study aimed to quantitatively assess the association between women's sanitation-related decision-making - overall, within the household, and within the community - and well-being in two urban municipalities in Bangladesh. This paper is a secondary analysis of cross-sectional survey data collected from 1449 women in Meherpur and Saidpur, Bangladesh from March-April 2022. We measured well-being using the World Health Organization Well-being Index [WHO-5] and primary exposures included women's sanitation-related decision-making and access to an unshared latrine. Decision-making was measured using the Agency, Resources, and Institutional Structures for Sanitation-related Empowerment (ARISE) scale; the full-scale score was utilized in the first analysis and the five individual factor scores were used in the second. Linear regression models were employed to assess the associations between decision-making and well-being scores, controlling for life stage, socioeconomic level, perceived social support and self-reported physical health. Analyses were conducted with city as a fixed effect and also stratified by city. Mean well-being scores were moderate in both cities, with approximately 20 % of respondents reporting poor well-being. On average, women generally agreed that they had a role in sanitation-related decision making (mean score = 2.66 on a 1-4 scale, with higher scores indicating stronger agreement that they had the ability to make sanitation-related decisions). In the full models using the full decision-making scale score, results indicated a positive association between the overall decision-making scale score and well-being (β = 0.73, p = 0.02). In full models using decision-making factor scores, we observed a positive association between well-being and individual decision-making factor scores for the ability to influence community-level sanitation decisions (β = 1.10, p = 0.0002) and to make small household sanitation decisions (β = 1.07, p = 0.006). Conversely, the ability to participate in community-level sanitation decisions was negatively associated with well-being (β = -0.68, p = 0.02). The ability to participate in household sanitation decisions and make large household sanitation decisions were not associated with well-being. Access to an unshared latrine was not associated with well-being in fully adjusted models. The relationships between decision-making factors and well-being varied in analyses stratified by city. Women's involvement in sanitation-related decision-making likely varies based on the extent of their participation, the nature of the decisions, and a range of contextual and household- or individual-level factors (e.g., socioeconomic level, age, education). To effectively improve women's well-being, sanitation programs must be informed by context-specific research exploring sanitation-related decision-making and its mediators among the populations of interest.

摘要

研究表明,妇女和女孩面临与卫生设施相关的特定性别压力源,这些压力源会影响她们的心理健康,而妇女的决策能动性可能在这种关系中发挥作用。本研究旨在定量评估孟加拉国两个城市辖区内妇女在卫生设施相关决策方面——总体上、家庭内部以及社区内部——与幸福感之间的关联。本文是对2022年3月至4月从孟加拉国梅赫布尔和赛义德布尔的1449名妇女收集的横断面调查数据进行的二次分析。我们使用世界卫生组织幸福感指数[WHO - 5]来衡量幸福感,主要暴露因素包括妇女在卫生设施相关决策方面的情况以及是否使用独立厕所。决策情况使用卫生设施相关赋权的能动性、资源和机构结构(ARISE)量表进行衡量;在首次分析中使用的是全量表得分,第二次分析中使用的是五个单独的因子得分。采用线性回归模型来评估决策情况与幸福感得分之间的关联,并对生活阶段、社会经济水平、感知到的社会支持和自我报告的身体健康进行控制。分析以城市为固定效应进行,并且也按城市进行分层。两个城市的平均幸福感得分都处于中等水平,约20%的受访者报告幸福感较差。平均而言,妇女普遍认同她们在卫生设施相关决策中发挥了作用(在1 - 4分的量表上平均得分为2.66分,得分越高表明她们越认同自己有能力做出与卫生设施相关的决策)。在使用全决策量表得分构建的完整模型中,结果表明总体决策量表得分与幸福感之间存在正相关(β = 0.73,p = 0.02)。在使用决策因子得分构建的完整模型中,我们观察到幸福感与影响社区层面卫生设施决策的能力(β = 1.10,p = 0.0002)以及做出小型家庭卫生设施决策的能力(β = 1.07,p = 0.006)这两个个体决策因子得分之间存在正相关。相反,参与社区层面卫生设施决策的能力与幸福感呈负相关(β = -0.68,p = 0.02)。参与家庭卫生设施决策的能力以及做出大型家庭卫生设施决策的能力与幸福感无关。在完全调整后的模型中,使用独立厕所与幸福感无关。在按城市分层的分析中,决策因子与幸福感之间的关系有所不同。妇女在卫生设施相关决策方面的参与程度可能因她们的参与范围、决策性质以及一系列背景和家庭或个人层面的因素(如社会经济水平、年龄、教育程度)而有所不同。为了有效提高妇女的幸福感,卫生项目必须依据针对特定背景的研究来制定,该研究要探索目标人群中与卫生设施相关的决策及其调节因素。

相似文献

1
The association between women's decision-making roles in sanitation and mental well-being in urban Bangladesh.孟加拉国城市地区女性在卫生设施决策中的角色与心理健康之间的关联。
Health Place. 2025 Jul 20;95:103515. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2025.103515.
2
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
3
Gender differences in the context of interventions for improving health literacy in migrants: a qualitative evidence synthesis.移民健康素养提升干预措施背景下的性别差异:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 12;12(12):CD013302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013302.pub2.
4
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
5
The Impact of Infrastructure on Low-Income Consumers' Nutritious Diet, Women's Economic Empowerment, and Gender Equality in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: An Evidence and Gap Map.基础设施对低收入和中等收入国家低收入消费者营养饮食、妇女经济赋权及性别平等的影响:证据与差距图
Campbell Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 18;21(3):e70050. doi: 10.1002/cl2.70050. eCollection 2025 Sep.
6
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
7
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对土壤传播蠕虫群体药物给药的看法:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.
8
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
9
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
10
Interventions for supporting pregnant women's decision-making about mode of birth after a caesarean.支持剖宫产术后孕妇做出分娩方式决策的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 30;2013(7):CD010041. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010041.pub2.