Suppr超能文献

重大铁路项目局部应急响应的协同决策

Collaborative decision-making for localized emergency response in major railroad projects.

作者信息

Lei Yuanyuan, Zhang Jingxiao, Zhang Ruixue, Yu Lean, Ballesteros-Pérez Pablo, Skitmore Martin

机构信息

School of Economics and Management, Chang'an University, Xi'an, China.

School of Economics and Management, Xi'an Shiyou University, Xi'an, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 21;15(1):26421. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09190-w.

Abstract

This paper examines major railroad projects' emergency response decision-making process, focusing on timeliness, cost-effectiveness, and public involvement. It explores the optimal collaborative strategies of local governments, enterprises, and the public during the construction phase. A novel tripartite decision-making framework is proposed, based on an asymmetric evolutionary game model and dynamic simulation methods. The results show a stable equilibrium in emergency response strategies emerges when public engagement is prioritized. Government subsidy policies are found to significantly influence the strategic choices of all agents, emphasizing the critical role of coordinated collaboration. The study highlights the importance of public participation and multi-agent cooperation in addressing complex emergency challenges. These findings provide valuable guidance for improving localized emergency response strategies, enhancing collaborative decision-making, optimizing resource allocation, increasing response efficiency, and supporting policy formulation in major railroad projects.

摘要

本文考察了重大铁路项目的应急响应决策过程,重点关注及时性、成本效益和公众参与。它探讨了建设阶段地方政府、企业和公众的最优合作策略。基于非对称演化博弈模型和动态模拟方法,提出了一种新颖的三方决策框架。结果表明,当优先考虑公众参与时,应急响应策略会出现稳定均衡。研究发现政府补贴政策对所有主体的战略选择有显著影响,强调了协同合作的关键作用。该研究突出了公众参与和多主体合作在应对复杂应急挑战中的重要性。这些发现为改进重大铁路项目的本地化应急响应策略、加强协同决策、优化资源配置、提高响应效率以及支持政策制定提供了有价值的指导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dce1/12280098/d8e33635236b/41598_2025_9190_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Collaborative decision-making for localized emergency response in major railroad projects.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 21;15(1):26421. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09190-w.
2
[Three-party game and simulation analysis of health-related information quality regulation in public health emergencies].
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2025 Jun 18;57(3):514-521. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2025.03.015.
6
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
9
Bridging energy and sustainability: A game theory and fuzzy decision analytics approach to climate change management.
J Environ Manage. 2025 Aug;390:126325. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126325. Epub 2025 Jun 26.
10
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.

本文引用的文献

4
Coordinating non-established disaster relief groups: a case study of Hurricane Irma in Florida, United States.
Disasters. 2021 Jul;45(3):717-737. doi: 10.1111/disa.12439. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
5
Four Decades of Public Participation in Risk Decision Making.
Risk Anal. 2021 Mar;41(3):503-518. doi: 10.1111/risa.13250. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
6
Towards emergency management of natural disasters and critical accidents: the Greek experience.
J Environ Manage. 2011 Oct;92(10):2657-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.003. Epub 2011 Jul 5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验