Odetoyinbo Kunle, McKay Carly D
Premier Game Academy Auditing Company, Premier League, London, UK.
Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2025 Jul 18;11(3):e002664. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2025-002664. eCollection 2025.
To determine whether the structures and processes of an English Championship football club's performance and healthcare team (PHCT) were associated with player availability (PA) during periods of match congestion (≤3 days between matches).
This sequential explanatory mixed-method case study included 10 practitioners from the PHCT. Participants completed team process/structure questionnaires two times per month during the 2017-2018 season. PA and match frequency data were provided by the PHCT, who also participated in a postseason focus group. Associations between PA and team structures/processes were assessed using Pearson correlations. Framework analysis was used to explore PHCT perceptions of teamwork effectiveness. Results synthesis was guided by the Integrated Team Effectiveness Model.
Mean PA during match congestion was 78.1% (95% bias-corrected and accelerated bootstrap CI (BCa): 76.2%, 80.4%) compared with 84.2% (95% BCa: 80.6%, 87.3%) during uncongested periods. There were significant associations between match frequency and PA (r= -0.68; 95% BCa: 0.32, 0.93; p=0.008) and PHCT processes and PA (r=0.53; 95% BCa: 0.09, 0.89; p=0.035). Having more PHCT meetings (r=0.46; BCa 95%: 0.22, 0.82; p=0.048) and greater satisfaction with those meetings (r=0.41; BCa 95%: 0.04, 0.07; p=0.043) were associated with higher PA, irrespective of match frequency. During match congestion, the PHCT reported that resource and task coordination issues negatively impacted their processes.
Match congestion was associated with disruptions to PHCT processes and structure, with negative implications for PA.
确定英冠足球俱乐部的表现及医疗保健团队(PHCT)的结构和流程与比赛密集期(比赛间隔≤3天)球员可上场率(PA)之间是否存在关联。
本序列解释性混合方法案例研究纳入了PHCT的10名从业者。在2017 - 2018赛季期间,参与者每月填写两次团队流程/结构问卷。PA和比赛频率数据由PHCT提供,他们还参与了赛季后的焦点小组。使用Pearson相关性评估PA与团队结构/流程之间的关联。采用框架分析来探究PHCT对团队协作有效性的看法。结果综合以综合团队有效性模型为指导。
比赛密集期的平均PA为78.1%(95%偏差校正和加速自抽样置信区间(BCa):76.2%,80.4%),而非密集期为84.2%(95% BCa:80.6%,87.3%)。比赛频率与PA之间存在显著关联(r = -0.68;95% BCa:0.32,0.93;p = 0.008),PHCT流程与PA之间也存在显著关联(r = 0.53;95% BCa:0.09,0.89;p = 0.035)。无论比赛频率如何,召开更多的PHCT会议(r = 0.46;BCa 95%:0.22,0.82;p = 0.048)以及对这些会议的更高满意度(r = 0.41;BCa 95%:0.04,0.07;p = 0.043)与更高的PA相关。在比赛密集期,PHCT报告称资源和任务协调问题对其流程产生了负面影响。
比赛密集期与PHCT流程和结构的中断相关,对PA有负面影响。