Huang Yen-Ming, Yang Yu-Meng, Wang Tzu, Ho Yunn-Fang, Chan Hsun-Yu
Graduate Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, 100025, Taiwan.
School of Pharmacy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, 100025, Taiwan.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Jul 16;19:2039-2053. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S531219. eCollection 2025.
Understanding personal beliefs about medications is an effective approach to improving adherence. A validated tool is essential for identifying these beliefs in routine clinical practice.
To validate the factor structure and reliability of the Traditional Chinese version of the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire-Specific (BMQ-Specific) among individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in Taiwan.
The original 10-item BMQ-Specific was translated into Traditional Chinese using a forward-backward translation process and reviewed by four experts in pharmacy practice and educational psychology. A cross-sectional study was conducted among adults with T2D who were using diabetes medications. Participants were recruited from five community pharmacies in Taiwan between June 2023 and May 2024. Internal consistency was assessed using McDonald's omega (ω). Construct validity was examined through exploratory factor analysis, and criterion validity was determined by exploring associations between concern beliefs, medication adherence, and glycemic control, as measured by A1C levels.
Two hundred and seventy-three patients participated in the study. Exploratory factor analysis confirmed a two-factor structure consistent with the original English version, comprising the Specific-Necessity and Specific-Concerns subscales. All items loaded onto their respective subscales. The internal consistency reliability of the instrument was acceptable, with McDonald's ω values of 0.785 for both the BMQ-Specific Necessity and BMQ-Specific Concerns subscales. These satisfactory properties were further supported by predictive validity data, which demonstrated the impact of treatment beliefs on adherence levels. The BMQ-Specific Concerns subscale showed a positive correlation with higher barriers to medication-taking (r = 0.270, p < 0.001) and poorer glycemic control (r = 0.130, p = 0.032).
The Traditional Chinese BMQ-Specific is a reliable and valid tool for assessing medication beliefs among patients with T2D in Taiwan. It can be effectively incorporated into clinical practice to support patient-provider communication and improve medication adherence.
了解个人对药物的信念是提高依从性的有效方法。在常规临床实践中,一个经过验证的工具对于识别这些信念至关重要。
验证台湾2型糖尿病(T2D)患者中《特定药物信念问卷》(BMQ-Specific)中文版的因子结构和信度。
采用正反翻译流程将最初的10项BMQ-Specific翻译成中文,并由四位药学实践和教育心理学专家进行审核。对正在使用糖尿病药物的成年T2D患者进行了一项横断面研究。2023年6月至2024年5月期间,从台湾的五家社区药房招募了参与者。使用麦克唐纳ω系数(ω)评估内部一致性。通过探索性因子分析检验结构效度,并通过探索关注信念、药物依从性和糖化血红蛋白(A1C)水平所衡量的血糖控制之间的关联来确定效标效度。
273名患者参与了该研究。探索性因子分析证实了与原始英文版一致的两因子结构,包括特定必要性和特定关注子量表。所有项目均加载到各自的子量表上。该工具的内部一致性信度是可接受的,BMQ-Specific必要性和BMQ-Specific关注子量表的麦克唐纳ω值均为0.785。预测效度数据进一步支持了这些令人满意的特性,这些数据证明了治疗信念对依从性水平的影响。BMQ-Specific关注子量表与更高的服药障碍(r = 0.270,p < 0.001)和更差的血糖控制(r = 0.130,p = 0.032)呈正相关。
中文版BMQ-Specific是评估台湾T2D患者药物信念的可靠且有效的工具。它可以有效地纳入临床实践,以支持医患沟通并提高药物依从性。