Suppr超能文献

赢得角色:父亲角色的制度化与当代父性的实现

Earning the Role: Father Role Institutionalization and the Achievement of Contemporary Fatherhood.

作者信息

Brown-Weinstock Rachel, Gold Sarah, Edin Kathryn, Nelson Timothy

机构信息

Princeton University, USA.

出版信息

Soc Probl. 2023 May 3;72(3):895-911. doi: 10.1093/socpro/spad022.

Abstract

Fatherhood has become an achieved status among complex, disadvantaged families. Stepfathers may have an advantage over nonresident biological fathers in earning the father role; in-depth interview studies reveal that nonresident fathers are often stripped of the father label while stepfathers commonly achieve it instead. This stepfather advantage is surprising given extant institutionalization theory, which suggests that the stronger institutionalization of the biological father role should benefit nonresident fathers over stepfathers. Drawing on 55 in-depth interviews with adolescents and their primary caregivers, we recenter youth agency in family theory by exploring how some men and not others earn the father role from the perspective of their adolescent children. We find that the strongly institutionalized role obligations of biological fathers impeded rather than aided nonresident father-child engagement. When nonresident fathers did not meet institutionalized expectations, adolescents experienced psychological trauma and usually resisted their attempts to become more involved. In contrast, the incomplete institutionalization of the stepparent role benefited stepfather-stepchild relations by allowing stepfathers to flexibly adapt to complex family dynamics. Further, stepfathers more easily met, and even exceeded, their stepchildren's limited expectations of them. Thus, stepfathers may face a lower cultural bar for and gain greater satisfaction from fulfilling the father role than nonresident biological fathers.

摘要

在复杂的弱势家庭中,成为父亲已成为一种既定的身份。继父在获得父亲角色方面可能比非共同居住的亲生父亲更具优势;深入访谈研究表明,非共同居住的父亲往往被剥夺父亲的标签,而继父通常却能获得这个标签。鉴于现有的制度化理论,这种继父优势令人惊讶,该理论认为,亲生父亲角色更强的制度化应该使非共同居住的父亲比继父更受益。通过对青少年及其主要照顾者进行55次深入访谈,我们从青少年子女的角度探讨了一些男性而非其他男性如何获得父亲角色,从而在家庭理论中重新聚焦青少年的能动性。我们发现,亲生父亲强烈制度化的角色义务阻碍而非促进了非共同居住的父子互动。当非共同居住的父亲没有达到制度化的期望时,青少年会经历心理创伤,通常会抵制他们进一步参与的尝试。相比之下,继父母角色的不完全制度化有利于继父子关系,因为继父能够灵活地适应复杂的家庭动态。此外,继父更容易满足,甚至超越继子女对他们有限的期望。因此,与非共同居住的亲生父亲相比,继父在履行父亲角色时可能面临更低的文化障碍,并获得更大程度的满足感。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

4
The Demography of Families: A Review of Patterns and Change.家庭人口统计学:模式与变化综述
J Marriage Fam. 2020 Feb;82(1):9-34. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12612. Epub 2020 Jan 5.
9
Examining the antecedents of U.S. nonmarital fatherhood.考察美国非婚生育父亲的前因。
Demography. 2013 Aug;50(4):1421-47. doi: 10.1007/s13524-013-0201-9.
10
Mothers' Repartnering after a Nonmarital Birth.非婚生育后母亲的重新伴侣关系。
Soc Forces. 2012;90(3):817-841. doi: 10.1093/sf/sos005. Epub 2012 Mar 29.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验