• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

垂直阅读如何影响罗马字母文字中的扫视编程和词汇处理?

How does vertical reading affect saccade programming and lexical processing in the Roman script?

作者信息

Özkan Zeynep G, Hyönä Jukka, Fernández-López Maria, Perea Manuel

机构信息

Departamento de Metodología and ERI‑Lectura, Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain.

Department of Psychology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 2025 Jul 22;89(4):125. doi: 10.1007/s00426-025-02154-9.

DOI:10.1007/s00426-025-02154-9
PMID:40694137
Abstract

Although computational models of eye movement control in reading have focused on horizontal text layouts, vertically oriented text is also encountered in daily life in the Roman script. To examine the interplay between saccade programming and lexical processing under vertical reading in the Roman script, we manipulated (1) the layout of words in a sentence (horizontal vs. vertical) and (2) word frequency (high vs. low). In the vertical layout, the words themselves remained in standard orientation but were arranged vertically (one below the other). Eye-movement measures at the sentence level (e.g., total reading time, number of fixations) showed a cost for the vertical arrangement, primarily reflected in longer fixation durations rather than a greater number of fixations. Critically, at the target-word level, the word-frequency effect -which increased in later eye-fixation measures (gaze duration, total time)- remained similar in size across both layouts. The additive pattern of word frequency and text layout, supported by Bayes factors, suggests that slower saccade programming in the vertical format does not substantially impact lexical processing. While lexical processing can influence saccade programming, delays in saccade programming do not, in turn, alter lexical processing-a pattern that constrains current models of eye movement control in reading.

摘要

尽管阅读中眼动控制的计算模型主要关注水平文本布局,但在日常生活中,罗马字母书写的文本也会出现垂直方向的排版。为了研究罗马字母垂直阅读时扫视编程与词汇加工之间的相互作用,我们操纵了两个因素:(1)句子中单词的布局(水平与垂直);(2)单词频率(高与低)。在垂直布局中,单词本身保持标准方向,但垂直排列(一个在另一个下方)。句子层面的眼动指标(如总阅读时间、注视次数)显示,垂直排列存在代价,主要表现为注视持续时间更长,而非注视次数更多。关键的是,在目标词层面,单词频率效应(在后期眼动注视指标,即注视时长、总时间中增加)在两种布局中大小相似。单词频率和文本布局的相加模式,得到贝叶斯因子的支持,表明垂直格式下较慢的扫视编程不会对词汇加工产生实质性影响。虽然词汇加工会影响扫视编程,但扫视编程的延迟反过来不会改变词汇加工——这一模式限制了当前阅读中眼动控制的模型。

相似文献

1
How does vertical reading affect saccade programming and lexical processing in the Roman script?垂直阅读如何影响罗马字母文字中的扫视编程和词汇处理?
Psychol Res. 2025 Jul 22;89(4):125. doi: 10.1007/s00426-025-02154-9.
2
Word length and frequency effects in natural Chinese reading: Evidence for character representations in lexical identification.汉语自然阅读中的词长与频率效应:词汇识别中汉字表征的证据
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Oct 6;78(7):17470218241281798. doi: 10.1177/17470218241281798.
3
Global measures of syntactic and lexical complexity are not strong predictors of eye-movement patterns in sentence and passage reading.句法和词汇复杂度的整体测量并非句子和篇章阅读中眼动模式的有力预测指标。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2025 Feb 21:17470218251317372. doi: 10.1177/17470218251317372.
4
The effect of orthography on the visual processing of affixed words: Evidence from Bengali.正字法对词缀词视觉加工的影响:来自孟加拉语的证据。
Cognition. 2025 Nov;264:106196. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106196. Epub 2025 Jul 1.
5
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
6
Frequency and predictability effects for line-final words.行尾单词的频率和可预测性效应。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2025 Jan;51(1):92-112. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001245.
7
Finding words in a sea of text: Word search as a measure of sensitivity to statistical regularities in reading.在海量文本中寻找词汇:单词搜索作为衡量阅读中对统计规律敏感度的一种方法。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2025 Sep;51(9):1507-1528. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001412. Epub 2025 Feb 13.
8
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍
9
An information-theoretic analysis of targeted regressions during reading.阅读过程中靶向回归的信息论分析。
Cognition. 2024 Aug;249:105765. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105765. Epub 2024 May 20.
10
Sensorimotor prediction is used to direct gaze toward task-relevant locations in a goal-directed throwing task.感觉运动预测用于在目标导向的投掷任务中引导目光看向与任务相关的位置。
J Neurophysiol. 2024 Aug 1;132(2):485-500. doi: 10.1152/jn.00052.2024. Epub 2024 Jun 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Column setting and text justification influence return-sweep eye movement behavior during Chinese multi-line reading.列设置和文本对齐方式影响中文多行阅读过程中的回扫眼动行为。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 Jun 3;9(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00559-5.
2
Direction-specific reading experience shapes perceptual span.方向特定的阅读体验塑造感知广度。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2024 Nov;50(11):1740-1748. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001340. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
3
Vertical and horizontal reading training in patients with hemianopia and its effect on reading eye movements.
对视偏盲患者进行垂直和水平阅读训练及其对阅读眼动的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 12;14(1):3558. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52618-y.
4
Accessing Semantic Information from Above: Parafoveal Processing during the Reading of Vertically Presented Sentences in Traditional Chinese.从上方获取语义信息:在阅读繁体中文时垂直呈现句子的视幅中加工。
Cogn Sci. 2022 Feb;46(2):e13104. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13104.
5
How resilient is reading to letter rotations? A parafoveal preview investigation.阅读对字母旋转的耐受性如何?一项副中央凹预视研究。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2021 Dec;47(12):2029-2042. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000999. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
6
Word frequency, predictability, and return-sweep saccades: Towards the modeling of eye movements during paragraph reading.词汇频率、可预测性和回扫扫视:朝向段落阅读中眼球运动的建模。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Dec;45(12):1614-1633. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000694. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
7
Power Analysis and Effect Size in Mixed Effects Models: A Tutorial.混合效应模型中的功效分析与效应量:教程
J Cogn. 2018 Jan 12;1(1):9. doi: 10.5334/joc.10.
8
Reading sentences of words with rotated letters: An eye movement study.阅读带有旋转字母的单词句子:一项眼动研究。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Jul;72(7):1790-1804. doi: 10.1177/1747021818810381. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
9
OB1-reader: A model of word recognition and eye movements in text reading.阅读者 OB1:一种文本阅读中单词识别和眼球运动的模型。
Psychol Rev. 2018 Nov;125(6):969-984. doi: 10.1037/rev0000119. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
10
Effects of aging, word frequency, and text stimulus quality on reading across the adult lifespan: Evidence from eye movements.衰老、词频和文本刺激质量对成年人一生阅读能力的影响:来自眼动的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Nov;44(11):1714-1729. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000543. Epub 2018 Apr 19.