Pollack Craig Evan, Bozzi Debra G, Blackford Amanda L, DeLuca Stefanie, Thornton Rachel, Herring Bradley
Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Hous Policy Debate. 2023;33(1):269-289. doi: 10.1080/10511482.2021.1951804. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
We performed a secondary analysis of the Moving To Opportunity (MTO) social experiment to investigate the impact of different types of housing assistance and neighborhood environments on long-term patterns of health care use for specific conditions and across different types of health care services. MTO participants, who were randomized at baseline, were linked to up to 21 years of all-payer hospital discharge and Medicaid data. Among the 9,170 children at the time of randomization, those who received a voucher had subsequent hospital admissions rates that were 36% lower for asthma and 30% lower for mental health disorders compared to the control group; rates of psychiatric services, outpatient hospital services, clinic services and durable medical equipment were also lower among the voucher groups. Findings for adults were not statistically significant. The results suggest that housing policies that reduce neighborhood poverty exposure as a child are associated with lower subsequent healthcare use for specific clinical conditions and types of services.
我们对“搬到机会”(MTO)社会实验进行了二次分析,以调查不同类型的住房援助和社区环境对特定疾病以及不同类型医疗服务的长期医疗使用模式的影响。MTO参与者在基线时被随机分组,并与长达21年的全付费者医院出院数据和医疗补助数据相关联。在随机分组时的9170名儿童中,与对照组相比,获得代金券的儿童随后因哮喘的住院率降低了36%,因精神疾病的住院率降低了30%;代金券组的精神科服务、门诊医院服务、诊所服务和耐用医疗设备的使用率也较低。成人的研究结果无统计学意义。结果表明,减少儿童时期社区贫困暴露的住房政策与特定临床疾病和服务类型的后续医疗使用减少有关。