• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Supporting our survivors: an evaluation of the facilitators and barriers to advocacy in cervical and breast cancer survivors.支持我们的幸存者:对宫颈癌和乳腺癌幸存者维权的促进因素与障碍的评估
Oncologist. 2025 Jul 4;30(7). doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyaf130.
2
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
3
Perception and Counseling for Cardiac Health in Breast Cancer Survivors Using the Health Belief Model: Qualitative Analysis.运用健康信念模型对乳腺癌幸存者进行心脏健康认知与咨询:定性分析
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Jul 3;11:e71062. doi: 10.2196/71062.
4
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
5
Feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness of laparoscopic versus abdominal hysterectomy for women and healthcare professionals: the LAVA trial qualitative process evaluation.腹腔镜子宫切除术与腹式子宫切除术对女性和医护人员的可行性、可接受性及适宜性:LAVA试验定性过程评估
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul 23:1-21. doi: 10.3310/GJTC1325.
6
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
7
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of lay health worker programmes to improve access to maternal and child health: qualitative evidence synthesis.实施非专业卫生工作者项目以改善孕产妇和儿童健康服务可及性的障碍与促进因素:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 8;2013(10):CD010414. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010414.pub2.
8
Prognostic factors for return to work in breast cancer survivors.乳腺癌幸存者恢复工作的预后因素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 May 7;5(5):CD015124. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015124.pub2.
9
Medical Advocacy among Latina Women Diagnosed with Breast Cancer.被诊断患有乳腺癌的拉丁裔女性中的医疗维权行动。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Apr 18;21(4):495. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21040495.
10
Factors that influence participation in physical activity for people with bipolar disorder: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.影响双相障碍患者参与体育活动的因素:定性证据的综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 4;6(6):CD013557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013557.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Utilization of a primary care-based cancer survivorship clinic: patterns and patient characteristics.基于初级保健的癌症生存者诊所的利用情况:模式和患者特征。
J Cancer Surviv. 2024 Aug;18(4):1347-1355. doi: 10.1007/s11764-023-01378-1. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
2
The association between mental health, social support and physical health outcomes among older female cancer survivors.老年女性癌症幸存者的心理健康、社会支持与身体健康结果之间的关系。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2022 Jul;13(6):834-838. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.04.001. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
3
The Effect of a Web-Based Cervical Cancer Survivor's Story on Parents' Behavior and Willingness to Consider Human Papillomavirus Vaccination for Daughters: Randomized Controlled Trial.基于网络的宫颈癌幸存者故事对父母行为和考虑为女儿接种人乳头瘤病毒疫苗意愿的影响:随机对照试验。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 May 25;8(5):e34715. doi: 10.2196/34715.
4
Stigma and cervical cancer prevention: A scoping review of the U.S. literature.污名与宫颈癌预防:美国文献的范围综述。
Prev Med. 2021 Dec;153:106849. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106849. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
5
Increasing Engagement for Breast Cancer Screening and Treatment: The "ICANTREAT" Community of Expertise Initiative.提高乳腺癌筛查和治疗的参与度:“ICANTREAT”专业知识社区倡议。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2020 Dec 1;21(12):3655-3659. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.12.3655.
6
A Conceptual Framework of Self-advocacy in Women With Cancer.癌症女性患者的自我倡导概念框架
ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2021;44(1):E1-E13. doi: 10.1097/ANS.0000000000000342.
7
Effects of a Cancer Survivorship Clinic-preliminary results.癌症康复诊所的效果——初步结果。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 May;28(5):2381-2388. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05067-7. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
8
Cancer stigma and cancer screening attendance: a population based survey in England.癌症污名与癌症筛查参与度:基于英格兰人群的调查
BMC Cancer. 2019 Jun 11;19(1):566. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5787-x.
9
Developing a Quality of Cancer Survivorship Care Framework: Implications for Clinical Care, Research, and Policy.制定癌症生存者照护质量框架:对临床照护、研究和政策的影响。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Nov 1;111(11):1120-1130. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djz089.
10
Impact of lymphoma survivorship clinic visit on patient-centered outcomes.淋巴瘤生存者门诊就诊对以患者为中心的结局的影响。
J Cancer Surviv. 2019 Jun;13(3):344-352. doi: 10.1007/s11764-019-00756-y. Epub 2019 Apr 26.

支持我们的幸存者:对宫颈癌和乳腺癌幸存者维权的促进因素与障碍的评估

Supporting our survivors: an evaluation of the facilitators and barriers to advocacy in cervical and breast cancer survivors.

作者信息

Bos Lia, Pinto Elizabeth, Longinos Norma, Ketch Peter, Cockrell Dillon, Boitano Teresa, Scarinci Isabel

机构信息

University of Alabama at Birmingham, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Birmingham, AL, United States.

University of Alabama at Birmingham, School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, United States.

出版信息

Oncologist. 2025 Jul 4;30(7). doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyaf130.

DOI:10.1093/oncolo/oyaf130
PMID:40694380
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12362239/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the facilitators and barriers to self-advocacy and advocacy in the community of cervical and breast cancer survivors.

METHODS

A mixed-methods approach was used to collect data from patients with breast and cervical cancer. Qualitative interviews were conducted after presenting for routine oncologic follow-up appointments All interviews were transcribed and coded by two separate investigators. The Female Self-Advocacy in Cancer Survivorship Scale (FSACS) was administered and demographic data were collected to quantitatively evaluate self-advocacy behaviors and socioeconomic characteristics in the two groups.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients were interviewed: 11 cervical cancer (CC) patients and 10 breast cancer (BC) patients. The median age was 47 years, with approximately half having early-stage disease and half having advanced or recurrent disease. The facilitators to self-advocacy included being open with their support system, wanting more information, and being determined to fight. Barriers to self-advocacy included fear, not opening up to family and friends, and not wanting additional information. Facilitators to advocacy in the community were talking with their children about their diagnosis, having an interest in support groups, and a desire to help. Barriers to community advocacy included not always feeling supported, a lack of confidence, and a lack of understanding of their disease process. CC participants scored lower on the FSACS survey compared to BC patients, with mean scores of 95 and 107, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Facilitators to advocacy involve having a strong social network and a determination to fight or desire to help. Barriers include fear, lack of confidence, and lack of knowledge. Increasing resources to encourage social connection, education, and advocacy opportunities can positively impact cancer survivors well-being.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估宫颈癌和乳腺癌幸存者在社区中自我倡导及他人倡导的促进因素和障碍。

方法

采用混合方法从乳腺癌和宫颈癌患者中收集数据。在患者进行常规肿瘤学随访预约后进行定性访谈。所有访谈均由两名独立研究人员进行转录和编码。使用癌症幸存者女性自我倡导量表(FSACS)并收集人口统计学数据,以定量评估两组患者的自我倡导行为和社会经济特征。

结果

共访谈了21名患者,其中11名宫颈癌(CC)患者和10名乳腺癌(BC)患者。中位年龄为47岁,约一半患者患有早期疾病,另一半患有晚期或复发性疾病。自我倡导的促进因素包括对支持系统坦诚相待、希望获得更多信息以及有抗争的决心。自我倡导的障碍包括恐惧、不向家人和朋友敞开心扉以及不想获取更多信息。在社区中进行他人倡导的促进因素包括与子女谈论自己的诊断、对支持小组感兴趣以及有帮助他人的愿望。社区倡导的障碍包括并非总是感到得到支持、缺乏信心以及对自身疾病进程缺乏了解。与乳腺癌患者相比,宫颈癌患者在FSACS调查中的得分较低,平均得分分别为95分和107分。

结论

倡导的促进因素包括拥有强大的社交网络以及抗争的决心或帮助他人的愿望。障碍包括恐惧、缺乏信心和知识不足。增加资源以鼓励社交联系、教育和倡导机会可对癌症幸存者的幸福感产生积极影响。