• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

整合先前来源的海洋和淡水生物能量密度。

Marine and freshwater organism energy densities integrated across previous sources.

作者信息

Hermann Nathan T, Wuenschel Mark J, Furey Nathan B

机构信息

Department of Biological Sciences, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire, USA.

Northeast Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, Woods Hole Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Ecology. 2025 Jul;106(7):e70154. doi: 10.1002/ecy.70154.

DOI:10.1002/ecy.70154
PMID:40696569
Abstract

Energy is the currency of exchange within ecosystems which defines the strength and influence of interactions, particularly between predator and prey. The ability to estimate the productivity of an ecosystem is, therefore, dependent upon the estimation of consumer diet contents and their energetic quality. To estimate growth, reproduction, and, ultimately, survival of individuals, measures of prey quality for predators are essential both at the individual level and for scaling to ecosystem-wide fluxes and pools. Among measures of prey quality, energy density (in kilojoules per gram) is the most used in ecology. Considerable efforts have established estimates of energy densities for many aquatic taxa. However, a database of aquatic organism energetics constructed by integrating and organizing across multiple sources spawning marine and freshwater habitats across the globe is needed to add both depth (more samples to measure within-taxa variation) and breadth (more taxa). To generate a comprehensive energy density database of aquatic organisms, we performed a multifaceted review to find sources from the peer-reviewed and grey literature with a broad search on Web of Science, from citations of related literature, and a haphazard recommendation from experts. Estimates of energy density of whole organism live mass (in kilojoules per gram wet mass) were prioritized to better relate to diet and energetics studies. When energy density was only provided per gram dry mass, the dry mass and percentage water were used to calculate energy density per gram wet mass. Sub-organism (i.e., tissue specific) energy density estimates are included (e.g., muscle, liver, and egg) when only these were reported. A total of 3810 records are included from 134 sources, covering 2018 unique taxa, of which 1771 (87.76%) are identified at the species level. Species or taxa-specific energy densities ranged from 0.015 to 17.949 kJ/g wet mass (WM) with a mean ± SD = 4.509 ± 1.94 kJ/g WM and median = 4.225 kJ/g WM. Among those phyla with more than three species (n phyla = 9), chordates (n taxa = 1283) had the highest average energy density (mean ± SD; 4.92 ± 1.90; 0.162-17.9 kJ/g WM) and ctenophores (n taxa = 4) had the lowest average (0.0988 ± 0.074; 0.03-0.205 kJ/g WM). Each record includes the organism taxonomy to the lowest resolution listed in the original source, energetic data available from the source including body composition and energy density data, number of replicates and methodology for measuring energetics information-primarily split between bomb calorimetry and proximate composition-as well as the source's author(s), year, and publication. Additional meta-data are included whenever possible based on details from the original source including the (1) environmental features: area, method, and timing of capture; (2) methodological features: storage method, storage duration, and tissue type measured; and (3) organismal features: mass, length, and sex as well as any additional notes about the source. This comprehensive database integrates those data discoverable by our search and which met inclusion criteria identified above in a taxonomic and spatial organization framework to facilitate modeling trophic interactions, bioenergetics, growth, productivity, and energy fluxes through marine and freshwater ecosystems. The data and code are released under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license.

摘要

能量是生态系统中的交换货币,它定义了各种相互作用的强度和影响,尤其是捕食者与猎物之间的相互作用。因此,估计生态系统生产力的能力取决于对消费者饮食内容及其能量质量的估计。为了估计个体的生长、繁殖以及最终的生存情况,捕食者的猎物质量衡量指标对于个体层面以及扩大到生态系统范围的通量和存量来说都至关重要。在猎物质量的衡量指标中,能量密度(每克千焦)是生态学中使用最多的。人们已经付出了相当大的努力来估计许多水生生物分类群的能量密度。然而,需要一个通过整合和组织全球多个产卵海洋和淡水栖息地的多个来源构建的水生生物能量学数据库,以增加深度(更多样本以测量分类群内的变异)和广度(更多分类群)。为了生成一个全面的水生生物能量密度数据库,我们进行了多方面的综述,从同行评审文献和灰色文献中寻找来源,在科学网进行广泛搜索,从相关文献的引用中获取信息,并参考专家的随意推荐。优先考虑对整个生物体活体质量的能量密度估计(每克湿质量千焦),以便更好地与饮食和能量学研究相关联。当仅提供每克干质量的能量密度时,使用干质量和含水量来计算每克湿质量的能量密度。当仅报告了亚生物体(即组织特异性)的能量密度估计值时(例如肌肉、肝脏和卵子),也将其包括在内。总共从134个来源纳入了3810条记录,涵盖2018个独特的分类群,其中1771个(87.76%)在物种水平上得到鉴定。物种或分类群特异性的能量密度范围为0.015至17.949千焦/克湿质量(WM),平均值±标准差 = 4.509 ± 1.94千焦/克WM,中位数 = 4.225千焦/克WM。在那些物种数量超过三个的门中(n门 = 9),脊索动物(n分类群 = 1283)的平均能量密度最高(平均值±标准差;4.92 ± 1.90;0.162 - 17.9千焦/克WM),栉水母(n分类群 = 4)的平均能量密度最低(0.0988 ± 0.074;0.03 - 0.205千焦/克WM)。每条记录包括原始来源中列出的最低分辨率的生物体分类学信息、来源中可用的能量数据,包括身体组成和能量密度数据、重复次数以及测量能量学信息的方法(主要分为弹式量热法和近似组成法),以及来源的作者、年份和出版物。只要可能,还会根据原始来源的详细信息纳入其他元数据,包括(1)环境特征:捕获区域、方法和时间;(2)方法学特征:储存方法、储存持续时间和测量的组织类型;(3)生物体特征:质量、长度和性别以及关于来源的任何其他注释。这个综合数据库将我们搜索到的、符合上述纳入标准的数据整合到一个分类学和空间组织框架中,以促进对海洋和淡水生态系统中营养相互作用、生物能量学、生长、生产力和能量通量的建模。数据和代码根据知识共享署名4.0许可协议发布。

相似文献

1
Marine and freshwater organism energy densities integrated across previous sources.整合先前来源的海洋和淡水生物能量密度。
Ecology. 2025 Jul;106(7):e70154. doi: 10.1002/ecy.70154.
2
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
3
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
4
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
5
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
6
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍
7
The quantity, quality and findings of network meta-analyses evaluating the effectiveness of GLP-1 RAs for weight loss: a scoping review.评估胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)减肥效果的网状Meta分析的数量、质量及结果:一项范围综述
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jun 25:1-73. doi: 10.3310/SKHT8119.
8
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
9
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
10
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.