Tercel Maximillian P T G, Cuff Jordan P, Symondson William O C, Moorhouse-Gann Rosemary J, Bishop Tom Rhys, Cole Nik C, Jolin Eric, Govier Bethan, Chambon Johannes, Mootoocurpen Rouben, Goder Martine, Vaughan Ian P
School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust, Trinity, Jersey.
Ecology. 2025 Jul;106(7):e70158. doi: 10.1002/ecy.70158.
The success of non-native species depends on their ability to find food, which may ultimately lead to competition with native species and contribute to biodiversity loss in invaded ecosystems. Understanding which food resources are consumed is therefore crucial for evaluating how non-native species mechanistically fit into native biological communities. Non-native species may be predators or competitors of native species or may be consumed by native species as a novel source of nutrition, for example, and this can occur between both closely and distantly related species. Studies examining competitive interactions between non-native species and distantly related native taxa are relatively rare, largely because it is difficult to compare their diets using traditional methods. However, dietary DNA metabarcoding overcomes these limitations by enabling the construction of highly detailed food webs. Here, we use dietary DNA metabarcoding between two generalist native consumers-a reptile (Telfair's skink) and a Scolopendra centipede (Serpent Island centipede)-and the hyperabundant non-native ant community to test which consumer groups prey upon one another and partition food resources. To determine how non-native ants fit into a native community, we calculated dietary composition, niche overlap, and dietary diversity of ants, centipedes, and skinks on Round Island, a small 2.19-km oceanic island located 22.5 km north-east of Mauritius. We observed distinct partitioning of food resources among the three consumer groups-skinks, centipedes, and ants-and found that the level of predation between these groups varied. Skinks and centipedes frequently consumed non-native ants, which may represent an important nutritional resource for both native consumers. Dietary differences persisted through seasons despite large shifts in the availability of food and concomitant diet composition for all three consumers. We conclude that non-native ants fit into the biological community of Round Island as both prey for native consumers and extreme omnivorous generalists, but not necessarily at the expense of the native consumers because it is unlikely the consumers are competing for food resources. Our results suggest that abundant non-native generalists, which are highly invasive in much of their introduced range, can infiltrate native food webs without exerting strong competitive forces on other common native generalist species.
外来物种的成功取决于它们寻找食物的能力,这最终可能导致与本地物种的竞争,并导致入侵生态系统中的生物多样性丧失。因此,了解哪些食物资源被消耗对于评估外来物种如何机械地融入本地生物群落至关重要。例如,外来物种可能是本地物种的捕食者或竞争者,或者可能被本地物种作为一种新的营养来源所消耗,这可能发生在亲缘关系密切和疏远的物种之间。研究外来物种与亲缘关系较远的本地分类群之间的竞争相互作用相对较少,主要是因为使用传统方法比较它们的饮食很困难。然而,饮食DNA元条形码技术通过构建高度详细的食物网克服了这些限制。在这里,我们使用饮食DNA元条形码技术,对两种本地广食性消费者——一种爬行动物(特尔费尔氏石龙子)和一种蜈蚣(蛇岛蜈蚣)——与数量过多的外来蚂蚁群落进行分析,以测试哪些消费者群体相互捕食并划分食物资源。为了确定外来蚂蚁如何融入本地群落,我们计算了位于毛里求斯东北22.5公里处的面积为2.19平方公里的小岛圆岛上蚂蚁、蜈蚣和石龙子的饮食组成、生态位重叠和饮食多样性。我们观察到三个消费者群体——石龙子、蜈蚣和蚂蚁——之间食物资源的明显划分,并发现这些群体之间的捕食水平各不相同。石龙子和蜈蚣经常捕食外来蚂蚁,这可能是这两种本地消费者的重要营养资源。尽管所有三种消费者的食物供应和随之而来的饮食组成发生了很大变化,但饮食差异在不同季节仍然存在。我们得出结论,外来蚂蚁作为本地消费者的猎物和极端杂食性广食者融入了圆岛的生物群落,但不一定以牺牲本地消费者为代价,因为消费者不太可能争夺食物资源。我们的结果表明,大量的外来广食性物种在其引入的大部分范围内具有高度入侵性,它们可以渗透到本地食物网中,而不会对其他常见的本地广食性物种施加强大的竞争压力。