Szajkowski Sebastian, Pasek Jarosław, Cieślar Grzegorz
Faculty of Medical Sciences, Warsaw Medical Academy of Applied Sciences, 8 Rydygiera St., 01-793 Warszawa, Poland.
Collegium Medicum, Jan Długosz University in Częstochowa, 13/15 Armii Krajowej St., 42-200 Częstochowa, Poland.
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2025 Jun 29;10(3):249. doi: 10.3390/jfmk10030249.
Pain manifestations as well as increased muscle tone and stiffness noted in the course of delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS) are reflected in altered values of the biomechanical and visco-elastic parameters of muscles. This study aimed to compare the effects of soft tissue mobilization with foam rolling and percussive massage on symptoms of DOMS induced by a standardized muscle fatigue protocol. Healthy volunteers (n = 60) were divided into three groups: FR group-foam rolling (n = 20), PM group-percussive massage (n = 20) and CON group-control/passive rest (n = 20). The fatigue protocol for the gastrocnemius muscle was carried out for development of DOMS in subsequent days. Therapeutic procedures were applied to participants for 3 consecutive days. The results of therapy were assessed by means of myotonometry, performed five times (before, three times during the treatment procedure, and after the end of the procedure). Foam rolling significantly reduced the onset and duration of increased muscle tone ( = 0.006) and stiffness ( < 0.001), unlike percussive massage. The control group exhibited higher tone and stiffness after 48 h, at the peak of DOMS-related pain symptoms. Only foam rolling improved elasticity (decrement, < 0.001), while visco-elastic properties (relaxation, creep) varied inversely with tone and stiffness. Foam rolling led to significantly lower stiffness (day 2) and reduced decrement and relaxation (day 4) compared to the control. Neither therapy was more effective than passive rest for pain relief during the observation period. Foam rolling and percussive massage accelerate recovery of muscle tone, stiffness, and elasticity after DOMS as compared to passive rest but offer no added benefit for pain relief.
延迟性肌肉酸痛(DOMS)过程中出现的疼痛表现以及肌肉张力和僵硬程度增加,反映在肌肉生物力学和粘弹性参数的改变上。本研究旨在比较泡沫轴放松和冲击式按摩这两种软组织松动术对标准化肌肉疲劳方案诱发的DOMS症状的影响。健康志愿者(n = 60)被分为三组:FR组-泡沫轴放松(n = 20),PM组-冲击式按摩(n = 20)和CON组-对照/被动休息(n = 20)。对腓肠肌进行疲劳方案以在随后几天诱发DOMS。对参与者连续3天进行治疗程序。通过肌动测量法评估治疗结果,共进行五次(治疗前、治疗过程中三次、治疗结束后)。与冲击式按摩不同,泡沫轴放松显著降低了肌肉张力增加(P = 0.006)和僵硬程度(P < 0.001)的发作和持续时间。对照组在48小时后,即在与DOMS相关的疼痛症状高峰期,表现出更高的张力和僵硬程度。只有泡沫轴放松改善了弹性(衰减,P < 0.001),而粘弹性特性(松弛、蠕变)与张力和僵硬程度呈反比。与对照组相比,泡沫轴放松在第2天导致显著更低的僵硬程度,并在第4天降低了衰减和松弛程度。在观察期内,两种治疗方法在缓解疼痛方面均不比被动休息更有效。与被动休息相比,泡沫轴放松和冲击式按摩可加速DOMS后肌肉张力、僵硬程度和弹性的恢复,但在缓解疼痛方面没有额外益处。