Suppr超能文献

一项关于鲁卡帕尼与安慰剂维持疗法在转移性和复发性子宫内膜癌中应用的II期随机双盲研究。

A phase II, randomized, double-blind study of the use of rucaparib vs. placebo maintenance therapy in metastatic and recurrent endometrial cancer.

作者信息

Corr Bradley R, Haggerty Ashley, Gysler Stefan M, Taylor Sarah, Behbakht Kian, Alldredge Jill, Lefkowits Carolyn, Brubaker Lindsay W, Bouts Catherine, Babayan Lisa Marie, Martin Lainie P, Costello James, Bitler Benjamin G, Hu Junxiao, Guntupalli Saketh R

机构信息

University of Colorado Hospital, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Academic Office 1, Mail-Stop B198-412631 E. 17(th) AveAurora, Colorado 80045 USA.

Hackensack Meridian Health School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,1 Riverview Plaza, Red Bank, NJ 07701 USA.

出版信息

Gynecol Oncol. 2025 Jul 22;200:58-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2025.07.008.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Rucaparib is a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor with proven efficacy in multiple tumor types. The efficacy of PARP inhibition in endometrial cancer remains unclear.

METHODS

We conducted a multi-institutional, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized phase II trial. Eligible patients had stage III, IV or recurrent endometrial cancer. We assigned patients with measurable, or non-measurable disease following completion of first- or second-line chemotherapy in a 1:1 ratio to receive oral rucaparib (600 mg twice daily) or placebo until disease progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Secondary outcomes were overall survival and safety. Exploratory outcomes evaluated response in relation to tumor molecular profiles and transcriptomic profiles.

RESULTS

79 patients were randomized, 39 received rucaparib and 40 received placebo. Median progression free survival was 28.1 months in the rucaparib arm compared to 8.7 months in the placebo group, hazard ratio 0.45; (95 % confidence interval [CI] (0.24-0.87); p = 0.02). Median overall survival was not reached in the rucaparib arm compared to 28.4 months in the placebo arm; hazard ratio 0.43 (95 % CI, 0.18-1.05). In patients treated with rucaparib, the most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events were anemia, fatigue, and neutropenia. Loss of p53 activity correlated to improved rucaparib response by transcriptomic evaluation. Traditional DNA repair homologous recombination biomarkers did not correlate with response.

CONCLUSIONS

Maintenance use of rucaparib after first- or second-line chemotherapy demonstrates promising activity and warrants further evaluation in a phase III evaluation. Adverse events were aligned with previous use of rucaparib in other tumor types and no new safety signals were identified.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov identifier: NCT03617679.

摘要

目的

鲁卡帕尼是一种聚(ADP - 核糖)聚合酶(PARP)抑制剂,已证实在多种肿瘤类型中具有疗效。PARP抑制在子宫内膜癌中的疗效仍不明确。

方法

我们开展了一项多机构、双盲、安慰剂对照的随机II期试验。符合条件的患者患有III期、IV期或复发性子宫内膜癌。在一线或二线化疗完成后,我们将可测量或不可测量疾病的患者按1:1比例分配,接受口服鲁卡帕尼(每日两次,每次600 mg)或安慰剂,直至疾病进展。主要终点是无进展生存期。次要结局是总生存期和安全性。探索性结局评估了与肿瘤分子谱和转录组谱相关的反应。

结果

79例患者被随机分组,39例接受鲁卡帕尼治疗,40例接受安慰剂治疗。鲁卡帕尼组的中位无进展生存期为28.1个月,而安慰剂组为8.7个月,风险比为0.45;(95%置信区间[CI](0.24 - 0.87);p = 0.02)。鲁卡帕尼组未达到中位总生存期,而安慰剂组为28.4个月;风险比为0.43(95%CI,0.18 - 1.05)。在接受鲁卡帕尼治疗的患者中,最常见的≥3级不良事件是贫血、疲劳和中性粒细胞减少。通过转录组评估,p53活性丧失与鲁卡帕尼反应改善相关。传统的DNA修复同源重组生物标志物与反应无关。

结论

一线或二线化疗后维持使用鲁卡帕尼显示出有前景的活性,值得在III期评估中进一步评价。不良事件与鲁卡帕尼先前在其他肿瘤类型中的使用情况一致,未发现新的安全信号。

临床试验

gov标识符:NCT03617679。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

4
5
Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy in Advanced Endometrial Cancer.帕博利珠单抗联合化疗治疗晚期子宫内膜癌。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Jun 8;388(23):2159-2170. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2302312. Epub 2023 Mar 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验