Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Clin Cancer Res. 2024 Oct 15;30(20):4644-4653. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-1225.
The purpose of the study was to compare the effectiveness of PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy (mPARPi) in real-world practice by biomarker status [BRCA1/2 alterations (BRCAalt) and a homologous recombination deficiency signature (HRDsig)] in advanced ovarian cancer.
Patients with ovarian cancer receiving first-line platinum-based chemotherapy and either mPARPi or no maintenance were included. Patient data were obtained by a US-based de-identified ovarian cancer Clinico-Genomic Database, from ∼280 US cancer clinics (01/2015-03/2023). Real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and overall survival (rwOS) were compared by biomarker status using Cox models, weighted by propensity scores.
Of 673 patients, 160 received mPARPi [31.2% BRCAalt and 51.9% HRDsig(+)] and 513 no maintenance [15.6% BRCAalt and 34.1% HRDsig(+)]. BRCAalt patients receiving mPARPi versus no maintenance had favorable rwPFS [HR, 0.48; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.26-0.87; P = 0.0154], as did BRCA wild-type (WT; HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.57-1.01; P = 0.0595). Favorable rwOS was not observed with mPARPi for BRCAalt or BRCA-WT. HRDsig(+) patients receiving mPARPi versus no maintenance had favorable rwPFS (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.24-0.55; P < 0.001) and numerically favorable rwOS (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.21-1.02; P = 0.0561). No differences were observed for HRDsig(-). mPARPi treatment interaction was observed for HRDsig(+) versus HRDsig(-) (rwPFS P < 0.001/rwOS P = 0.016) but not for BRCAalt versus BRCA-WT. Patients with BRCA-WT/HRDsig(+) receiving mPARPi had favorable rwPFS (HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.22-0.72; P = 0.003), whereas no difference was observed for BRCA-WT/HRDsig(-).
HRDsig predicted benefit of mPARPi better than BRCAalt. Patients with HRDsig(+) status experienced favorable outcomes, even if they had BRCA-WT status. In contrast, patients with HRDsig(-) status did not show significant benefit from mPARPi treatment. HRDsig might predict benefit from mPARPi regardless of BRCAalt status.
本研究旨在通过生物标志物状态(BRCA1/2 改变(BRCAalt)和同源重组缺陷特征(HRDsig))比较在高级卵巢癌中真实世界实践中 PARP 抑制剂维持治疗(mPARPi)的疗效。
纳入了接受一线铂类化疗且接受 mPARPi 或无维持治疗的卵巢癌患者。患者数据来自美国基于去识别的卵巢癌临床基因组数据库,来自约 280 家美国癌症诊所(2015 年 1 月至 2023 年 3 月)。通过 Cox 模型比较生物标志物状态下的真实世界无进展生存期(rwPFS)和总生存期(rwOS),并通过倾向评分加权。
在 673 名患者中,160 名患者接受了 mPARPi[31.2%BRCAalt 和 51.9%HRDsig(+)],513 名患者未接受维持治疗[15.6%BRCAalt 和 34.1%HRDsig(+)]。与未接受维持治疗相比,接受 mPARPi 治疗的 BRCAalt 患者的 rwPFS 更有利[HR,0.48;95%置信区间(CI),0.26-0.87;P=0.0154],BRCA 野生型(WT)也是如此[HR,0.76;95%CI,0.57-1.01;P=0.0595]。BRCAalt 或 BRCA-WT 患者接受 mPARPi 治疗并未观察到 rwOS 获益。与未接受维持治疗相比,HRDsig(+)患者接受 mPARPi 治疗的 rwPFS 更有利[HR,0.36;95%CI,0.24-0.55;P<0.001],rwOS 也有数值上的获益[HR,0.46;95%CI,0.21-1.02;P=0.0561]。HRDsig(-)患者未观察到差异。观察到 HRDsig(+)与 HRDsig(-)之间的 mPARPi 治疗相互作用(rwPFS P<0.001/rwOS P=0.016),但 BRCAalt 与 BRCA-WT 之间没有差异。接受 mPARPi 治疗的 BRCA-WT/HRDsig(+)患者的 rwPFS 更有利[HR,0.40;95%CI,0.22-0.72;P=0.003],而 BRCA-WT/HRDsig(-)患者则没有差异。
HRDsig 比 BRCAalt 更好地预测 mPARPi 的获益。具有 HRDsig(+)状态的患者即使 BRCA-WT 状态也经历了有利的结局。相比之下,具有 HRDsig(-)状态的患者未从 mPARPi 治疗中获得显著获益。HRDsig 可能预测无论 BRCAalt 状态如何,mPARPi 的获益。