• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

OPEN, Hybrid, Minimally Invasive, And Robotic-Assisted Transthoracic Esophagectomy For Cancer A Network Meta-Analysis Of Randomized Trials.

作者信息

Aiolfi Alberto, Cammarata Francesco, Bonitta Gianluca, Bona Davide, Bonavina Luigi

机构信息

Division of General Surgery, Department of Biomedical Science for Health, I.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, University of Milan, Italy.

Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Division of General and Foregut Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2025 Jul 23. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002985.

DOI:10.1097/JS9.0000000000002985
PMID:40701573
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The surgical approach to esophageal cancer is evolving. Open (OE) and hybrid esophagectomy (HE) have been standard treatments for years but minimally invasive (MIE) and robotic-assisted esophagectomy (RAMIE) have recently emerged with promising perspectives.

PURPOSE

Compare short-term outcomes among different techniques for transthoracic esophagectomy.

METHODS

Systematic review and random effect Frequentist network meta-analysis. Included were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting short-term outcomes for transthoracic OE, HE, MIE, and RAMIE in adult patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer. Primary outcomes were anastomotic leak, pulmonary complications (PCs), and in-hospital mortality. Risk ratio (RR), standardized mean difference (SMD), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used as pooled effect size measures. PROSPERO (XXXXXXXXXXXX).

RESULTS

Eight RCTs (1776 patients) were included. Overall, 493 patients (27.8%) underwent OE, 494 (27.9%) HE, 447 (25.3%) MIE, and 338 (19.2%) RAMIE. Adenocarcinoma was diagnosed 65.8% of patients while neoadjuvant therapy was completed in 64.1%. Ivor-Lewis or McKeown esophagectomy were performed in 43.3% and 56.7% of patients, respectively. MIE and RAMIE were associated with a reduced risk of PCs compared to OE (RR = 0.46; 95% CI 0.29-0.71 and RR = 0.48; 95% CI 0.33-0.71) and HE (RR = 0.54; 95% CI 0.34-0.86 and RR = 0.57; 95%CI 0.37-0.87). Additionally, MIE and RAMIE showed significantly reduced intraoperative blood loss and hospital length of stay compared to OE and HE. Among surgical approaches, anastomotic leak, in-hospital mortality, together with the other perioperative and oncological outcomes were equivalent.

CONCLUSIONS

MIE and RAMIE were associated with significantly reduced postoperative PCs, intraoperative blood loss and shorter hospital stays compared to OE and HE. MIE and RAMIE showed equivalent perioperative outcomes and oncological radicality.

摘要

相似文献

1
OPEN, Hybrid, Minimally Invasive, And Robotic-Assisted Transthoracic Esophagectomy For Cancer A Network Meta-Analysis Of Randomized Trials.
Int J Surg. 2025 Jul 23. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002985.
2
Minimally invasive vs open vs hybrid esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.微创与开放及杂交食管癌切除术治疗食管癌的系统评价和网状 Meta 分析。
Dis Esophagus. 2024 Nov 28;37(12). doi: 10.1093/dote/doae086.
3
Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.微创与开放食管癌切除术治疗癌症的系统评价与荟萃分析。
Minerva Chir. 2009 Apr;64(2):121-33.
4
Is minimally invasive esophagectomy effective for preventing anastomotic leakages after esophagectomy for cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis.微创食管切除术对预防癌症食管切除术后吻合口漏是否有效?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2015 Sep 4;13:269. doi: 10.1186/s12957-015-0661-z.
5
Robotic-assisted versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy: a retrospective cohort study from a high-volume center.机器人辅助与传统微创食管切除术:一项来自高容量中心的回顾性队列研究。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jul 22;19(1):414. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02590-0.
6
Robot-assisted and conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy are associated with better postoperative results compared to hybrid and open transthoracic esophagectomy.机器人辅助和传统的微创食管切除术与杂交和开胸经胸食管切除术相比,具有更好的术后结果。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2022 Apr;48(4):776-782. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.11.121. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
7
The impact of postoperative atrial fibrillation on complications and mortality following Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.食管癌Ivor Lewis食管切除术后房颤对并发症及死亡率的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):22305. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06239-8.
8
Impact of anastomotic leak vs pneumonia on failure to rescue after transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer.食管癌经胸切除术后吻合口漏与肺炎对未能挽救生命的影响。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Mar;29(3):101936. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.101936. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
9
Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Postoperative Outcomes in a Nationwide Cohort.机器人辅助微创食管切除术:全国队列的术后结果。
J Surg Res. 2023 Mar;283:152-160. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.09.029. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
10
Omentoplasty for esophagogastrostomy after esophagectomy.食管切除术后食管胃吻合术的网膜成形术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11:CD008446. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008446.pub2.