Kanani Fahim, Ovdat Ester, Younis Mohammed, Meyerovich Guy, Messer Nir, Barenboim Alexander, Goykhman Yaacov, Lubezky Nir
Department HPB and Transplant Surgery, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv University School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2025 Aug 31;29(3):323-333. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.25-108. Epub 2025 Jul 24.
BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: Arterial resection in pancreatic cancer remains controversial. This study evaluates outcomes of pancreatic resection with arterial involvement following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Retrospective analysis of 100 pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients undergoing resection after neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX (2010-2024): 26 with arterial resection (ArP), 39 with portal-venous resection (PoP), and 35 without vascular involvement (NoP). Primary outcomes included perioperative morbidity, mortality, and survival.
ArP patients had significantly more stage III disease (73.1% vs 58.9% vs 28.6%, < 0.001) but achieved acceptable R0 resection rates (76.9% vs 84.6% vs 91.4%, = 0.04). ArP procedures required longer operative time (386 ± 71 minutes), greater blood loss (1,100 ± 560 mL), and more transfusions (57.7%; all < 0.001). Major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ III) were higher in ArP (26.9% vs 21.6% vs 8.6%, = 0.03), with extended ICU stays (3.5 ± 1.5 vs 2.0 ± 1.0 vs 1.0 ± 0.5 days). Ninety-day mortality was 0% (ArP), 2.5% (PoP), and 5.7% (NoP) ( = 0.78). Despite shorter disease-free survival in ArP (7.4 vs 9.7 vs 13.2 months, = 0.01), median overall survival was comparable (ArP: 19.1, PoP: 18.3, NoP: 22.7 months; = 0.0652).
Arterial resection following neoadjuvant therapy in selected pancreatic cancer patients demonstrates acceptable perioperative risk and achieves survival outcomes comparable to less advanced cases. This approach is justified in experienced high-volume centers for appropriately selected patients with favorable response to neoadjuvant therapy, offering potential cure in rare circumstances.
背景/目的:胰腺癌的动脉切除仍存在争议。本研究评估新辅助化疗后伴有动脉受累的胰腺癌切除的结局。
回顾性分析100例接受新辅助FOLFIRINOX方案(2010 - 2024年)后行切除术的胰腺腺癌患者:26例行动脉切除(ArP),39例行门静脉切除(PoP),35例无血管受累(NoP)。主要结局包括围手术期发病率、死亡率和生存率。
ArP组患者III期疾病显著更多(73.1%对58.9%对28.6%,P<0.001),但R0切除率可接受(76.9%对84.6%对91.4%,P = 0.04)。ArP手术需要更长的手术时间(386±71分钟)、更多的失血量(1100±560毫升)和更多的输血(57.7%;均P<0.001)。ArP组严重并发症(Clavien-Dindo≥III级)更高(26.9%对21.6%对8.6%,P = 0.03),重症监护病房住院时间延长(3.5±1.5天对2.0±1.0天对1.0±0.5天)。90天死亡率分别为0%(ArP)、2.5%(PoP)和5.7%(NoP)(P = 0.78)。尽管ArP组无病生存期较短(7.4个月对9.7个月对13.2个月,P = 0.01),但总生存期中位数相当(ArP:19.1个月,PoP:18.3个月,NoP:22.7个月;P = 0.0652)。
在选定的胰腺癌患者中,新辅助治疗后行动脉切除显示围手术期风险可接受,生存结局与病情较轻的病例相当。对于新辅助治疗反应良好的适当选定患者,这种方法在经验丰富的大容量中心是合理的,在罕见情况下可提供潜在的治愈机会。