Rantula Olli A, Lipponen Jukka A, Halonen Jari, Jäntti Helena, Rissanen Tuomas T, Naukkarinen Noora S, Väliaho Eemu-Samuli, Santala Onni E, Sedha Jagdeep, Martikainen Tero J, Hartikainen Juha E K
School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, PO Box 1627, 70210 Kuopio, Finland.
Doctoral School, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, PO Box 1627, 70210 Kuopio, Finland.
Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2025 May 23;6(4):723-732. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf055. eCollection 2025 Jul.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia, increasing stroke risk. Detecting AF is challenging due to its asymptomatic and paroxysmal nature. This study combines photoplethysmography (PPG) with automated techniques to detect AF, assess AF burden, and monitor rhythm changes from AF to sinus rhythm (SR).
Ninety patients with recent-onset (duration <48 h) AF, scheduled for cardioversion, were monitored using a three-channel PPG armband on the upper arm. An ambulatory three-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) served as the gold standard. PPG recordings were segmented into 10-, 20-, 30-, and 60-min detection windows. Automated detection identified SR and AF episodes, rhythm changes, and AF burden. Sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values (PPVs), and negative predictive values (NPVs) for rhythm detection were calculated, and the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for PPG-based AF burden were compared to the gold standard. Monitoring time ranged from 1.0 to 8.2 h per patient. Sensitivities, specificities, PPVs, and NPVs for AF detection were 93.9-94.6, 99.5-99.8, 99.4-99.7, and 93.7-95.0%, respectively. The ICC (0.97-0.98) indicated excellent agreement between PPG and the gold standard in estimating AF burden, with differences of -6.3 to -8.3 min (5.5-6.8%). Rhythm changes from AF to SR were detected in all patients (sensitivity 100%), with detection delays of 4.1 ± 1.4, 8.7 ± 2.8, 13.7 ± 3.9, and 27.8 ± 7.1 min depending on the detection window.
Photoplethysmography with automated analysis shows promise in detecting AF, AF burden, and rhythm changes, indicating its potential in AF screening.
NCT04917653.
心房颤动(AF)是最常见的心律失常,会增加中风风险。由于其无症状和阵发性的特点,检测AF具有挑战性。本研究将光电容积脉搏波描记法(PPG)与自动化技术相结合,以检测AF、评估AF负荷并监测从AF到窦性心律(SR)的节律变化。
90例近期发作(持续时间<48小时)的AF患者计划进行心脏复律,使用上臂的三通道PPG臂带进行监测。动态三导联心电图(ECG)作为金标准。PPG记录被分割为10分钟、20分钟、30分钟和60分钟的检测窗口。自动检测识别出SR和AF发作、节律变化以及AF负荷。计算节律检测的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV),并将基于PPG的AF负荷的组内相关系数(ICC)与金标准进行比较。每位患者的监测时间为1.0至8.2小时。AF检测的敏感性、特异性、PPV和NPV分别为93.9 - 94.6%、99.5 - 99.8%、99.4 - 99.7%和93.7 - 95.0%。ICC(0.97 - 0.98)表明PPG与金标准在估计AF负荷方面具有极好的一致性,差异为 - 6.3至 - 8.3分钟(5.5 - 6.8%)。所有患者均检测到从AF到SR的节律变化(敏感性100%),根据检测窗口不同,检测延迟分别为4.1±1.4分钟、8.7±2.8分钟、13.7±3.9分钟和27.8±7.1分钟。
具有自动分析功能的光电容积脉搏波描记法在检测AF、AF负荷和节律变化方面显示出前景,表明其在AF筛查中的潜力。
NCT04917653。