Zhang Yiguo, Chen Xi, Wang Meng, Zhu Yuping, Shi Wei, Li Chao, Zhang Zhengwen, Taniguchi Hiroaki, Ao Ping
The Laboratory of Cell Biochemistry and Topogenetic Regulation, College of Bioengineering and Faculty of Medical Sciences, Chongqing University, No. 174 Shazheng Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing 400044, China.
School of Life and Health Sciences, Fuyao University of Science and Technology, No. 104 Wisdom Avenue, Nanyu Town, Minhou County High-Tech District, Fuzhou 350109, Fujian, China.
Cell Stress. 2025 Jul 7;9:65-142. doi: 10.15698/cst2025.07.306. eCollection 2025.
Differential and even opposing functions of two major antioxidant transcription factors Nrf1 and Nrf2 (encoded by and , respectively) are determined by distinctions in their tempospatial positioning, topological repartitioning, proteolytic processing, and biochemical modification, as well as in their shared evolutionary origin. As a matter of fact, the allelopathic potentials of Nrf1 and Nrf2 (both resembling two entangled 'Yin-Yang' quanta that comply with a dialectic law of the unity of opposites) are fulfilled to coordinately control redox physiological homeostasis so as to be maintained within the presetting thresholds. By putative exponential curves of redox stress and intrinsic anti-redox capability, there is inferable to exist a set point at approaching zero with the 'Golden Mean' for the healthy survival (i.e., dubbed the 'zero theory'). A bulk of the hitherto accumulating evidence demonstrates that the set point of redox homeostasis is dictated selectively by multi-hierarchical threshold settings, in which the living fossil-like Nrf1 acts as a robust indispensable determinon, whereas Nrf2 serves as a versatile chameleon-like master regulon, in governing the redox homeodynamic ranges. This is attributable to the facts that Nrf2 has exerted certain 'double-edged sword' effects on life process, whereas Nrf1 executes its essential physiobiological functions, along with unique pathophysiological phenotypes, by integrating its 'three-in-one' roles elicited as a specific triplet of direct sensor, transducer and effector within multi-hierarchical stress responsive signaling to redox metabolism and target gene reprogramming. Here, we also critically reviewed redox regulation of physio-pathological functions from the eco-evo-devo perspectives, through those coding rules (redox code, stress-coping code, and topogenetic code). The evolving concepts on stress and redox stress were also further revisited by scientific principles of physics and chemistry. Besides, several novel concepts such as oncoprotists, Reverse Central Dogma, and Grand Redox-Unifying Theory' (GRUT) of life, together with diffusive reactive species (DRS)-based murburn concept integrating all stochastic electron-, proton- and/or moiety-transfer reactive and interactive processes (e.g., PCHEMS), are introduced in this interdisciplinary and synthetic review.
两种主要抗氧化转录因子Nrf1和Nrf2(分别由 和 编码)的差异性功能甚至是相反功能,取决于它们在时空定位、拓扑重分配、蛋白水解加工、生化修饰以及共同进化起源方面的差异。事实上,Nrf1和Nrf2的化感潜力(两者类似于两个相互纠缠的“阴阳”量子,符合对立统一的辩证规律)得以实现,以协调控制氧化还原生理稳态,使其维持在预设阈值内。通过氧化还原应激和内在抗氧化还原能力的假定指数曲线,可以推断出存在一个接近零的设定点,即“黄金分割点”,以实现健康生存(即所谓的“零理论”)。迄今为止积累的大量证据表明,氧化还原稳态的设定点由多层次阈值设置选择性决定,其中,活化石样的Nrf1作为一个强大且不可或缺的决定因子,而Nrf2则作为一个多功能的变色龙样主调控因子,来控制氧化还原稳态范围。这归因于以下事实:Nrf2在生命过程中发挥了一定的“双刃剑”作用,而Nrf1通过整合其在多层次应激反应信号传导至氧化还原代谢和靶基因重编程过程中作为直接传感器、转导器和效应器的特定三联体所引发的“三位一体”作用,执行其基本的生理生物学功能以及独特的病理生理表型。在此,我们还从生态 - 进化 - 发育的角度,通过那些编码规则(氧化还原编码、应激应对编码和拓扑发生编码),对生理病理功能的氧化还原调节进行了批判性综述。关于应激和氧化还原应激的不断演变的概念,也通过物理和化学科学原理进行了进一步探讨。此外,本跨学科综合综述还引入了几个新概念,如肿瘤共生体、反向中心法则和生命的“大氧化还原统一理论”(GRUT),以及基于扩散反应物种(DRS)的murburn概念,该概念整合了所有随机的电子、质子和/或部分转移反应及相互作用过程(如PCHEMS)。