Suppr超能文献

促炎“不良”脂多糖与免疫调节“良好”脂多糖之间的平衡对于理解肠道源性全身炎症的意义。

The balance between proinflammatory, "bad", and immunomodulatory, "good", lipopolysaccharide for understanding gut-derived systemic inflammation.

作者信息

Tume Rafael, El Sherbiny Samar, Bono Roberto, Gautier Thomas, Pais de Barros Jean Paul, Meroño Tomás

机构信息

Biomarkers and Nutrimetabolomics Laboratory, Department de Nutrició, Ciències de l'Alimentació i Gastronomia, Nutrition and Food Safety Research Institute (INSA), Facultat de Farmàcia i Ciències de l'Alimentació, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

出版信息

Front Immunol. 2025 Jul 9;16:1588129. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1588129. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from Gram-negative bacteria has been one of the most studied pathogen-associated molecular patterns triggering rapid inflammatory reactions. However, evidence shows that not all LPS molecules are proinflammatory ("bad"), and that "good" LPS from gut commensal bacteria exert immunomodulatory actions. The Limulus amebocyte lysis test commonly used to quantify LPS in circulation, only targets "bad" LPS, when not inactivated by plasma components. Use of other methods showed healthy subjects featuring elevated levels of LPS (suggesting predominance of "good" or inactive LPS in circulation). This review aims to summarize the evidence supporting the higher abundance of "good" LPS coming from gut commensals of healthy individuals and their potential impact in human health.

摘要

革兰氏阴性菌的脂多糖(LPS)一直是引发快速炎症反应的研究最多的病原体相关分子模式之一。然而,有证据表明,并非所有LPS分子都具有促炎作用(“有害”),来自肠道共生菌的“有益”LPS具有免疫调节作用。鲎试剂检测常用于定量循环中的LPS,当不被血浆成分灭活时,仅针对“有害”LPS。其他方法的使用表明,健康受试者的LPS水平升高(表明循环中“有益”或无活性LPS占主导)。本综述旨在总结支持健康个体肠道共生菌来源的“有益”LPS含量更高及其对人类健康潜在影响的证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2495/12283283/08ad9f8ed21c/fimmu-16-1588129-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验