Carl J, Brøchner-Mortensen J, Støckel M, Christensen M
Phys Med Biol. 1985 Oct;30(10):1123-9. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/30/10/011.
The application of data-processing methods such as deconvolution or computer-assisted background subtraction to renography requires knowledge of the input to the kidneys. The two most commonly used approximations to the kidney input in 131I-hippuran probe renography are to assume that the kidney input is described either by the time-activity curve recorded over the subclavian region (mode I) or by the time derivative of mode I (mode II). A third approximation to the kidney input using two externally recorded time-activity curves, pre-injection of 131I-albumin and two venous samples has previously been described. This approach has been modified in this work, in which two externally recorded time-activity curves and two capillary samples are used to construct an estimate for the kidney input (mode III). The three modes are compared with a reference, which is constructed from capillary samples drawn during the renography examination. Eleven patients participated in this study, all of whom were referred for routine renography. The results show that only mode III is close to the reference in all cases.
将诸如去卷积或计算机辅助背景扣除等数据处理方法应用于肾造影需要了解肾脏的输入情况。在¹³¹I-马尿酸盐探头肾造影中,对肾脏输入最常用的两种近似方法是假设肾脏输入由锁骨下区域记录的时间-活度曲线(模式I)或模式I的时间导数(模式II)来描述。先前已描述了使用两条外部记录的时间-活度曲线、¹³¹I-白蛋白预注射和两份静脉样本对肾脏输入进行的第三种近似方法。在本研究中对该方法进行了改进,使用两条外部记录的时间-活度曲线和两份毛细血管样本构建肾脏输入的估计值(模式III)。将这三种模式与一个参考值进行比较,该参考值由肾造影检查期间采集的毛细血管样本构建而成。11名患者参与了本研究,他们均因常规肾造影而被转诊。结果表明,在所有情况下只有模式III接近参考值。