Juventia Stella D, van Apeldoorn Dirk F, Faber Hilde, Rossing Walter A H
Farming Systems Ecology Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Field Crops, Wageningen University & Research, Edelhertweg 10, Lelystad, The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 24;20(7):e0329133. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329133. eCollection 2025.
Strip cropping, where several crops are grown in adjacent long and narrow multi-row strips, is an innovation niche that challenges monocropping by offering a greater range of ecosystem services, including higher biodiversity and aesthetic value at similar yield. It can be implemented within the current regime by adjusting the strip width to fit machinery working width. However, its novelty and complexity, that mobilize four dimensions of diversity-space, time, gene, and operational crop management-make transitions from monocropping difficult. This study aims to learn from the experiences of strip cropping frontrunners by: 1) capturing the contexts, objectives, challenges, and outcomes of farmers' first-year strip cropping experience, and 2) identifying patterns in farmers' decision rules following its uptake. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with ten Dutch farmers with at least one-year strip cropping experience. Upon formulating the farmers' operational management decision rules, we used two analytical lenses to find patterns in the changes compared to monocropping. Results showed that all farmers shared the objective of increasing insect biodiversity. Common challenges included a lack of agro-ecological knowledge and experience, incompatible machinery working width, and crop neighbor damage. Most farmers positively evaluated the feasibility to adjust or acquire adapted machines, were neutral on yield changes, and negatively evaluated workload. We identified 49 decision rules comprising 113 condition-decision relations. We found two clusters or archetypes of farmers that differed in their propensity to adjust mechanization. No pattern was found among the other adjustments from monocropping to strip cropping, indicating that changes were highly farmer-specific. The two most often mentioned decisions included machine investment and crop choice adjustment. These apparent key decisions may guide exchanges among strip cropping farmers, advisors, and researchers. Leveraging diverse decision rules captured in this study, alongside strengthening the infrastructure and institutional support for strip cropping will help farmers transition towards sustainable agricultural systems.
带状种植是一种创新模式,即在相邻的狭长多排条带中种植多种作物,通过提供更多的生态系统服务来挑战单一种植模式,包括在产量相近的情况下实现更高的生物多样性和美学价值。通过调整条带宽度以适应机械作业宽度,带状种植可以在当前的种植制度下实施。然而,其新颖性和复杂性涉及多样性的四个维度——空间、时间、基因和作物作业管理,这使得从单一种植向带状种植的转变变得困难。本研究旨在借鉴带状种植先行者的经验,具体包括:1)了解农民第一年带状种植经历的背景、目标、挑战和成果;2)确定农民采用带状种植后决策规则的模式。我们对十位有至少一年带状种植经验的荷兰农民进行了半结构化深度访谈。在制定农民的作业管理决策规则后,我们使用两种分析视角来寻找与单一种植相比的变化模式。结果表明,所有农民都有增加昆虫生物多样性的目标。常见的挑战包括缺乏农业生态知识和经验、机械作业宽度不匹配以及作物邻作损害。大多数农民对调整或购置适用机器的可行性给予积极评价,对产量变化持中立态度,对工作量给予负面评价。我们确定了49条决策规则,包括113个条件 - 决策关系。我们发现了两类农民原型,他们在调整机械化的倾向方面存在差异。从单一种植到带状种植的其他调整中未发现模式,这表明变化具有很强的农民个体特异性。最常提到的两个决策包括机器投资和作物选择调整。这些明显的关键决策可能会指导带状种植农民、顾问和研究人员之间的交流。利用本研究中捕捉到的不同决策规则,同时加强对带状种植的基础设施和制度支持,将有助于农民向可持续农业系统转型。