• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种结合k-壳迭代和节点度的节点影响力排序算法。

A node influence ranking algorithm combining k-shell iteration and node degree.

作者信息

Ji Yating, Liu Lequn, Li Shujia, Lu Pu, Tang Qimei

机构信息

Information Management Office, Hefei Normal University, Hefei, China.

Key Laboratory of Philosophy and Social Science of Anhui Province on Adolescent Mental, Health and Crisis Intelligence Intervention, Hefei Normal University, Hefei, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jul 24;20(7):e0328381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328381. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0328381
PMID:40705803
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12289062/
Abstract

Identifying key nodes in complex networks holds significant application value in fields such as information dissemination and disease spread. The traditional K-shell decomposition method has low time complexity and is suitable for large-scale complex networks; however, it only considers global positional information, leading to lower discrimination. To improve the K-shell decomposition method, many approaches have been proposed by researchers. However, there no algorithm has yet that simultaneously uses the iteration factor and degree to further distinguish nodes with the same K-shell value. To address this issue, we propose a node influence ranking algorithm that integrates K-shell iteration, node degree, and neighbor information, considering both global network position and local topology. Through simulation experiments on eight networks, it was verified that this method provides more accurate ranking results compared to dc, bc, cc, k-shell, Ks + , KSIF, LGI and DCK methods on eight networks, with an average accuracy improvement of 5.15% over the second-best algorithm. In identifying the top 10 key nodes, the KTD algorithm demonstrates higher accuracy than other methods. Additionally, it shows high discriminative power and good time performance, making it suitable for large-scale complex networks.

摘要

识别复杂网络中的关键节点在信息传播和疾病传播等领域具有重要的应用价值。传统的K-shell分解方法时间复杂度低,适用于大规模复杂网络;然而,它只考虑全局位置信息,导致区分度较低。为了改进K-shell分解方法,研究人员提出了许多方法。然而,目前还没有算法能够同时使用迭代因子和度来进一步区分具有相同K-shell值的节点。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了一种节点影响力排序算法,该算法整合了K-shell迭代、节点度和邻居信息,兼顾了全局网络位置和局部拓扑结构。通过对八个网络的模拟实验验证,该方法在八个网络上比dc、bc、cc、k-shell、Ks +、KSIF、LGI和DCK方法提供了更准确的排序结果,比次优算法的平均准确率提高了5.15%。在识别前10个关键节点时,KTD算法比其他方法具有更高的准确率。此外,它还具有较高的区分能力和良好的时间性能,适用于大规模复杂网络。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2efa/12289062/e0d8d7dcedf6/pone.0328381.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2efa/12289062/2fce60c77cc4/pone.0328381.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2efa/12289062/31e6bc962561/pone.0328381.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2efa/12289062/c982aa244686/pone.0328381.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2efa/12289062/743ffb32ea3d/pone.0328381.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2efa/12289062/e0d8d7dcedf6/pone.0328381.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2efa/12289062/2fce60c77cc4/pone.0328381.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2efa/12289062/31e6bc962561/pone.0328381.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2efa/12289062/c982aa244686/pone.0328381.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2efa/12289062/743ffb32ea3d/pone.0328381.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2efa/12289062/e0d8d7dcedf6/pone.0328381.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
A node influence ranking algorithm combining k-shell iteration and node degree.一种结合k-壳迭代和节点度的节点影响力排序算法。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 24;20(7):e0328381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328381. eCollection 2025.
2
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
3
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
5
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
6
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
9
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
10
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.

本文引用的文献

1
Modeling the spread of infectious diseases through influence maximization.通过影响力最大化对传染病传播进行建模。
Optim Lett. 2022;16(5):1563-1586. doi: 10.1007/s11590-022-01853-1. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
2
Community-based rumor blocking maximization in social networks: Algorithms and analysis.社交网络中基于社区的谣言阻断最大化:算法与分析
Theor Comput Sci. 2020 Nov 6;840:257-269. doi: 10.1016/j.tcs.2020.08.030. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
3
Multi-scale structure and topological anomaly detection via a new network statistic: The onion decomposition.
通过一种新的网络统计量——洋葱分解进行多尺度结构和拓扑异常检测。
Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 18;6:31708. doi: 10.1038/srep31708.
4
The H-index of a network node and its relation to degree and coreness.网络节点的H指数及其与度和核数的关系。
Nat Commun. 2016 Jan 12;7:10168. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10168.
5
Leaders in social networks, the Delicious case.社交网络中的领导者,美味书签案例。
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e21202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021202. Epub 2011 Jun 27.
6
The structure of scientific collaboration networks.科学合作网络的结构
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jan 16;98(2):404-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.98.2.404. Epub 2001 Jan 9.
7
The centrality of a graph.图的中心性
Psychometrika. 1966 Dec;31(4):581-603. doi: 10.1007/BF02289527.