Muscedere John, Shorey Carrie L, Duque Gustavo, Kim Perry, Lorbergs Amanda L, McGlory Chris, Merchant Reshma A, Newman John C, Rolland Yves, Vellas Bruno
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Queens University, Kingston, Canada.
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Queens University, Kingston, Canada.
J Nutr Health Aging. 2025 Jul 23;29(9):100637. doi: 10.1016/j.jnha.2025.100637.
Globally, older adults are living longer but often in poorer health with multiple chronic conditions straining healthcare systems. Gerotherapeutics, which target the biological mechanisms of aging, could reduce this burden by extending healthspan. However, before therapies can be adopted, they must undergo rigorous study and regulatory approval; existing regulatory frameworks and the barriers to their development are unknown.
We conducted a scoping review of geroscience regulatory frameworks and identified barriers to their development.
A comprehensive government, academic, and grey literature search in the United States, Europe, Canada, and other regions including Medline and EMBASE (via OVID), Google Scholar, CINAHL, and CADTH Grey Matters was conducted. For inclusion of only recent literature, searches were limited to English-language publications from 2014 to 2024.
In 3,780 publications screened for inclusion, no regulatory frameworks for gerotherapeutics were found. In the 34 included publications, 4 major barriers were identified: 1) lack of recognition of the biological processes of aging as targets for medical intervention; 2) absence of clear regulatory pathways to evaluate aging-focused therapies; 3) economic uncertainties, including high development costs and limited incentives due to unclear regulatory environments; and 4) insufficient public and policy engagement.
We did not identify any geroscience specific regulatory frameworks but identified barriers to their development. For biological aging to advance as a therapeutic target, stakeholders must develop comprehensive regulatory guidelines, incentivize research and conduct public education. Global collaboration is crucial to harmonize regulatory efforts and ensure equitable adoption of therapies, ultimately enhancing healthspan worldwide.
在全球范围内,老年人的寿命越来越长,但健康状况往往较差,多种慢性疾病给医疗系统带来了压力。老年治疗学旨在针对衰老的生物学机制,通过延长健康寿命来减轻这一负担。然而,在疗法被采用之前,它们必须经过严格的研究和监管批准;现有的监管框架及其发展障碍尚不清楚。
我们对老年科学监管框架进行了范围界定审查,并确定了其发展障碍。
在美国、欧洲、加拿大和其他地区进行了全面的政府、学术和灰色文献检索,包括通过OVID检索Medline和EMBASE、谷歌学术、CINAHL以及加拿大药物和卫生技术评估署的灰色事项。为仅纳入近期文献,检索限于2014年至2024年的英文出版物。
在筛选纳入的3780篇出版物中,未发现老年治疗学的监管框架。在纳入的34篇出版物中,确定了4个主要障碍:1)缺乏将衰老的生物学过程视为医学干预靶点的认识;2)缺乏评估以衰老为重点的疗法的明确监管途径;3)经济不确定性,包括开发成本高以及由于监管环境不明确导致激励措施有限;4)公众和政策参与不足。
我们未发现任何老年科学特定的监管框架,但确定了其发展障碍。为使生物衰老成为一个治疗靶点,利益相关者必须制定全面的监管指南,激励研究并开展公众教育。全球合作对于协调监管努力和确保公平采用疗法至关重要,最终可在全球范围内提高健康寿命。