• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

上肢缺失或差异儿童使用的结局测量指标及其心理测量学测试:一项范围综述方案

Outcome measures used and psychometrically tested in children with upper limb loss or difference: a scoping review protocol.

作者信息

Stepnitz Abigail, Morgan Sara, Gormley Caroline, Schiller Jessica, Munger Meghan, Laine Jennifer, Hall Michelle J

机构信息

Department of Orthotics/Prosthetics, Moira Tobin Wickes Orthotics Program, Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Research Department, Gillette Children's, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 24;15(7):e100151. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100151.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100151
PMID:40707157
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12306228/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Children with upper limb loss or difference (ULLD) require individualised and developmentally appropriate clinical care. To guide this specialised care, outcome measures can be used to assess important constructs, such as physical function, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and satisfaction with medical treatments and services. However, there is limited research available on which outcome measures are used to assess these constructs and whether they have been psychometrically assessed in children with ULLD who may or may not use a prosthesis. Thus, the purpose of this scoping review is (1) to determine which outcome measures are used to assess physical function, HRQoL and satisfaction in paediatric patients with ULLD and (2) to identify articles that include children with ULLD in psychometric assessments of these outcome measures. Findings of these studies will be reported. This review will inform healthcare professionals on which outcome measures assessing function, HRQoL and satisfaction have been psychometrically tested for use in children with ULLD. It will also inform future research on outcome measurement in this population.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A two-phase scoping review will be conducted in which PubMed, Web of Science and CINAHL will be searched: first, to identify which outcome measures are used to assess physical function, HRQoL and satisfaction in children with ULLD and, second, to determine whether those measures have been psychometrically assessed for use in this population. Teams of two reviewers will review articles for eligibility and extract information from eligible articles. Tie-breaking will be conducted by a third reviewer. Narrative summaries will be used to describe the findings of this scoping review.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

No ethical approval is needed. The results of the review will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant conferences.

REGISTRATION

The scoping review that applies this protocol has been registered on Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7UGWB).

摘要

引言

上肢缺失或有差异(ULLD)的儿童需要个性化且符合其发育阶段的临床护理。为指导这种专业护理,可使用结局指标来评估重要概念,如身体功能、健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)以及对医疗治疗和服务的满意度。然而,关于哪些结局指标用于评估这些概念以及它们是否在可能使用或不使用假肢的ULLD儿童中进行了心理测量学评估的研究有限。因此,本综述的目的是:(1)确定哪些结局指标用于评估ULLD儿科患者的身体功能、HRQoL和满意度;(2)识别在这些结局指标的心理测量学评估中纳入了ULLD儿童的文章。将报告这些研究的结果。本综述将告知医疗保健专业人员哪些评估功能、HRQoL和满意度的结局指标已在ULLD儿童中进行了心理测量学测试以供使用。它还将为该人群未来的结局测量研究提供信息。

方法与分析

将进行两阶段的综述,其中将检索PubMed、科学网和CINAHL:首先,确定哪些结局指标用于评估ULLD儿童的身体功能、HRQoL和满意度;其次,确定这些指标是否已在该人群中进行了心理测量学评估。由两名评审员组成的团队将审查文章的资格并从符合条件的文章中提取信息。如有争议将由第三名评审员进行裁决。将使用叙述性总结来描述本综述的结果。

伦理与传播

无需伦理批准。综述结果将提交至同行评审期刊发表,并在相关会议上展示。

注册

应用本方案的综述已在开放科学框架(https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7UGWB)上注册。

相似文献

1
Outcome measures used and psychometrically tested in children with upper limb loss or difference: a scoping review protocol.上肢缺失或差异儿童使用的结局测量指标及其心理测量学测试:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 24;15(7):e100151. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100151.
2
Comparison of cellulose, modified cellulose and synthetic membranes in the haemodialysis of patients with end-stage renal disease.纤维素、改性纤维素和合成膜在终末期肾病患者血液透析中的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(3):CD003234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003234.
3
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
4
Quality indicators for substance use disorder care: a scoping review protocol.物质使用障碍护理的质量指标:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 29;15(3):e085216. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085216.
5
The use of Open Dialogue in Trauma Informed Care services for mental health consumers and their family networks: A scoping review.创伤知情护理服务中使用开放对话模式为心理健康消费者及其家庭网络提供服务:范围综述。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Aug;31(4):681-698. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13023. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
6
Conservative, physical and surgical interventions for managing faecal incontinence and constipation in adults with central neurological diseases.保守治疗、物理治疗和手术干预用于治疗伴有中枢神经系统疾病的成年人的粪便失禁和便秘。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 29;10(10):CD002115. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002115.pub6.
7
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
8
Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation.用于中风康复的虚拟现实技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD008349. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008349.pub5.
9
Rehabilitation for ankle fractures in adults.成人踝关节骨折康复。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Sep 23;9(9):CD005595. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005595.pub4.
10
Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.影响重症成人和儿童机械通气撤机方案使用的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 4;10(10):CD011812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011812.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical outcomes measurement in pediatric lower limb prosthetics: A scoping review.临床结局测量在儿科下肢假肢中的应用:范围综述。
J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2024;17(2):147-165. doi: 10.3233/PRM-230014.
2
National population-based estimates for major birth defects, 2010-2014.2010-2014 年全国主要出生缺陷发生率的基于人群的估计。
Birth Defects Res. 2019 Nov 1;111(18):1420-1435. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.1589. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
3
Utilization of a Wide Array of Nonvalidated Outcome Scales in Pediatric Orthopaedic Publications: Can't We All Measure the Same Thing?
儿科骨科出版物中多种未经验证的结果量表的使用:我们难道不能测量同一件事吗?
J Pediatr Orthop. 2019 Feb;39(2):e153-e158. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001263.
4
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
5
The OMT Classification of Congenital Anomalies of the Hand and Upper Limb.《手与上肢先天性畸形的OMT分类》
Hand Surg. 2015 Oct;20(3):336-42. doi: 10.1142/S0218810415400055.
6
You've heard about outcome measures, so how do you use them? Integrating clinically relevant outcome measures in orthotic management of stroke.你已经了解了疗效指标,那么该如何运用它们呢?将临床相关疗效指标整合于中风的矫形器治疗中。
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2013 Feb;37(1):30-42. doi: 10.1177/0309364612446650. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
7
Upper limb prosthetic outcome measures: review and content comparison based on International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.上肢假肢的疗效评估:基于《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》的综述与内容比较
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2010 Jun;34(2):109-28. doi: 10.3109/03093641003776976.
8
Contemporary measurement techniques for rehabilitation outcomes assessment.康复效果评估的当代测量技术。
J Rehabil Med. 2005 Nov;37(6):339-45. doi: 10.1080/16501970500302793.
9
Characteristics of pediatric traumatic amputations treated in hospital emergency departments: United States, 1990-2002.美国1990 - 2002年医院急诊科收治的儿童创伤性截肢的特征
Pediatrics. 2005 Nov;116(5):e667-74. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2143.
10
Limb amputation and limb deficiency: epidemiology and recent trends in the United States.肢体截肢与肢体缺损:美国的流行病学及近期趋势
South Med J. 2002 Aug;95(8):875-83. doi: 10.1097/00007611-200208000-00018.