• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字滴度聚合酶链反应增强老年血流感染的早期诊断、治疗、预后及病原体鉴定。

ddPCR Enhances early diagnosis, treatment, prognosis, and pathogen verification in elderly BSI.

作者信息

Peng Jiayi, Bai Huili, Li Ying, Luo Huating, Li Jiajun, Dai Haifeng, Wang Hongmei, Meng Tao, Zhang Jia, Wang Zhijian, Chen Xuanxin, Cheng Wei, Peng Yan, Huang Wenxiang

机构信息

Department of Geriatrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

The Center for Clinical Molecular Detection, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025 Jul 10;15:1605795. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1605795. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fcimb.2025.1605795
PMID:40708754
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12286947/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bloodstream infection (BSI) exhibits elevated mortality, particularly among elderly patients manifesting atypical symptoms. Although blood culture (BC) remains the diagnostic gold standard, its limited sensitivity and prolonged turnaround time impede early detection. Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR), a novel pathogen detection method with superior sensitivity and rapid results, demonstrates significant diagnostic and prognostic for BSI. However, heightened sensitivity may increase false positive rates, with elderly patients particularly susceptible to specimen contamination and transient bacteremia.

METHODS

This retrospective study employed clinical judgment as the diagnostic reference. Patients were stratified into BSI and non-BSI groups, with data collected on ddPCR and BC results, imaging and laboratory findings, medication response, and discharge outcomes. The diagnostic accuracy and antibiotic guidance efficacy of ddPCR and BC were compared, and the clinical utility of ddPCR was evaluated for prognostic assessment and false positive identification.

RESULTS

The analysis encompassed 355 episodes from 280 elderly patients with suspected BSI. ddPCR demonstrated significantly higher detection rates compared to BC in BSI group (59.33% versus 20.57%). Combined implementation increased detection to 65.07%. Regardless of clinical judgment (59.61% versus 20.57%) or alternative microbiological tests (90.63% versus 7.14%) served as the reference standards, ddPCR exhibited superior sensitivity to BC. No significant differences emerged in antibiotic adjustment rates or therapeutic efficacy between ddPCR and BC. Elevated microbial species diversity correlated with unfavorable discharge outcomes (P<0.001, OR=2.122). Multiple follow-up ddPCR monitoring revealed progressive increases in the number of species and the copies of some (or all) species among patients with poor outcomes, contrasting with decreasing trends in those with favorable outcomes. When detecting , coagulase-negative (CoNS), complex, and , diagnostic thresholds of 132.55, 182.70/262.24, and 174.78 copies/mL, respectively, were established to help differentiate false-positive results.

CONCLUSION

The combination of ddPCR with BC improves BSI diagnosis in elderly patients and facilitates antibiotic treatment optimization. Moreover, ddPCR demonstrates potential for prognostic evaluation and false-positive discrimination. Nevertheless, these findings require further validation through large-scale prospective studies employing predefined clinical criteria.

摘要

背景

血流感染(BSI)的死亡率较高,尤其是在表现出非典型症状的老年患者中。尽管血培养(BC)仍然是诊断的金标准,但其有限的敏感性和较长的周转时间阻碍了早期检测。滴液数字聚合酶链反应(ddPCR)是一种新型病原体检测方法,具有更高的敏感性和快速的结果,对BSI具有显著的诊断和预后价值。然而,更高的敏感性可能会增加假阳性率,老年患者尤其容易受到标本污染和短暂菌血症的影响。

方法

本回顾性研究采用临床判断作为诊断参考。将患者分为BSI组和非BSI组,收集ddPCR和BC结果、影像学和实验室检查结果、药物反应及出院结局等数据。比较ddPCR和BC的诊断准确性及抗生素指导疗效,并评估ddPCR在预后评估和假阳性识别方面的临床应用价值。

结果

分析纳入了280例疑似BSI的老年患者的355次发作。在BSI组中,ddPCR的检测率显著高于BC(59.33%对20.57%)。联合应用可将检测率提高到65.07%。无论以临床判断(59.61%对20.57%)还是其他微生物检测(90.63%对7.14%)作为参考标准,ddPCR对BC均表现出更高的敏感性。ddPCR和BC在抗生素调整率或治疗效果方面无显著差异。微生物种类多样性增加与不良出院结局相关(P<0.001,OR=2.122)。多次随访ddPCR监测显示,预后不良患者的菌种数量及部分(或全部)菌种的拷贝数呈逐渐增加趋势,而预后良好患者则呈下降趋势。在检测凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(CoNS)、真菌复合体和肠球菌时,分别设定诊断阈值为132.55、182.70/262.24和174.78拷贝/mL,以帮助区分假阳性结果。

结论

ddPCR与BC联合应用可提高老年患者BSI的诊断率,并有助于优化抗生素治疗。此外,ddPCR在预后评估和假阳性鉴别方面具有潜力。然而,这些发现需要通过采用预定义临床标准的大规模前瞻性研究进一步验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4ef/12286947/99e7a6b83aeb/fcimb-15-1605795-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4ef/12286947/447634cd95be/fcimb-15-1605795-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4ef/12286947/b4c380429b1e/fcimb-15-1605795-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4ef/12286947/24e8717800e6/fcimb-15-1605795-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4ef/12286947/5305e0198e9d/fcimb-15-1605795-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4ef/12286947/e844dfebe423/fcimb-15-1605795-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4ef/12286947/f48fe696e475/fcimb-15-1605795-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4ef/12286947/7c53afb12f8a/fcimb-15-1605795-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4ef/12286947/54dea8e6efd4/fcimb-15-1605795-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4ef/12286947/99e7a6b83aeb/fcimb-15-1605795-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4ef/12286947/447634cd95be/fcimb-15-1605795-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4ef/12286947/b4c380429b1e/fcimb-15-1605795-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4ef/12286947/24e8717800e6/fcimb-15-1605795-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4ef/12286947/5305e0198e9d/fcimb-15-1605795-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4ef/12286947/e844dfebe423/fcimb-15-1605795-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4ef/12286947/f48fe696e475/fcimb-15-1605795-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4ef/12286947/7c53afb12f8a/fcimb-15-1605795-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4ef/12286947/54dea8e6efd4/fcimb-15-1605795-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4ef/12286947/99e7a6b83aeb/fcimb-15-1605795-g009.jpg

相似文献

1
ddPCR Enhances early diagnosis, treatment, prognosis, and pathogen verification in elderly BSI.数字滴度聚合酶链反应增强老年血流感染的早期诊断、治疗、预后及病原体鉴定。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025 Jul 10;15:1605795. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1605795. eCollection 2025.
2
Rapid detection of health-care-associated bloodstream infection in critical care using multipathogen real-time polymerase chain reaction technology: a diagnostic accuracy study and systematic review.使用多病原体实时聚合酶链反应技术在重症监护中快速检测医疗保健相关血流感染:一项诊断准确性研究和系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2015 May;19(35):1-142. doi: 10.3310/hta19350.
3
Diagnostic test accuracy and cost-effectiveness of tests for codeletion of chromosomal arms 1p and 19q in people with glioma.染色体臂 1p 和 19q 缺失的检测在胶质瘤患者中的诊断准确性和成本效益。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 2;3(3):CD013387. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013387.pub2.
4
Diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact of filmarray multiplex PCR system in bloodstream infections: A comparative study with conventional methods in a tertiary health care setting.FilmArray多重PCR系统在血流感染中的诊断准确性及临床影响:在三级医疗环境中与传统方法的比较研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jul 18;104(29):e43263. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043263.
5
Sepsis: the LightCycler SeptiFast Test MGRADE®, SepsiTest™ and IRIDICA BAC BSI assay for rapidly identifying bloodstream bacteria and fungi - a systematic review and economic evaluation.脓毒症:用于快速鉴定血流细菌和真菌的罗氏LightCycler SeptiFast Test MGRADE®、SepsiTest™和IRIDICA BAC BSI检测法——一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Jun;20(46):1-246. doi: 10.3310/hta20460.
6
A systematic review of positron emission tomography (PET) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for the diagnosis of breast cancer recurrence.基于正电子发射断层扫描(PET)和正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)用于乳腺癌复发诊断的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Oct;14(50):1-103. doi: 10.3310/hta14500.
7
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
8
Blood biomarkers for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis.用于子宫内膜异位症无创诊断的血液生物标志物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 1;2016(5):CD012179. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012179.
9
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
10
Laboratory-based molecular test alternatives to RT-PCR for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.基于实验室的分子检测替代 RT-PCR 用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染的诊断。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 14;10(10):CD015618. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015618.

本文引用的文献

1
Prognostic value of poly-microorganisms detected by droplet digital PCR and pathogen load kinetics in sepsis patients: a multi-center prospective cohort study.基于液滴数字 PCR 检测的多微生物和病原体载量动力学对脓毒症患者预后的评估:一项多中心前瞻性队列研究。
Microbiol Spectr. 2024 May 2;12(5):e0255823. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02558-23. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
2
Reliability of Droplet Digital PCR Alone and in Combination with Interleukin-6 and Procalcitonin for Prognosis of Bloodstream Infection.单独使用及联合白细胞介素-6和降钙素原的液滴数字PCR在血流感染预后评估中的可靠性
Infect Drug Resist. 2024 Mar 15;17:1051-1071. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S439683. eCollection 2024.
3
Clinical evaluation of a multiplex droplet digital PCR for pathogen detection in critically ill COVID-19 patients with bloodstream infections.
对重症 COVID-19 合并血流感染患者进行病原体检测的多重液滴数字 PCR 的临床评估。
Infection. 2024 Jun;52(3):1027-1039. doi: 10.1007/s15010-023-02157-x. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
4
Clinical Application of a Multiplex Droplet Digital PCR in the Rapid Diagnosis of Children with Suspected Bloodstream Infections.多重液滴数字PCR在疑似血流感染儿童快速诊断中的临床应用
Pathogens. 2023 May 16;12(5):719. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12050719.
5
Clinical Diagnostic Performance of Droplet Digital PCR for Suspected Bloodstream Infections.实时荧光定量 PCR 技术检测血培养中真菌的临床应用
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Feb 14;11(1):e0137822. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01378-22. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
6
Pathogen load and species monitored by droplet digital PCR in patients with bloodstream infections: A prospective case series study.采用液滴数字 PCR 监测血流感染患者病原体载量和种类的前瞻性病例系列研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Oct 4;22(1):771. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07751-2.
7
Clinical validation of a multiplex droplet digital PCR for diagnosing suspected bloodstream infections in ICU practice: a promising diagnostic tool.临床验证一种用于诊断 ICU 中疑似血流感染的多重液滴数字 PCR 方法:一种有前途的诊断工具。
Crit Care. 2022 Aug 8;26(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04116-8.
8
Clinical Application and Influencing Factor Analysis of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (mNGS) in ICU Patients With Sepsis.宏基因组下一代测序(mNGS)在 ICU 脓毒症患者中的临床应用及影响因素分析。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022 Jul 13;12:905132. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.905132. eCollection 2022.
9
Diagnosis of Bloodstream Infections: An Evolution of Technologies towards Accurate and Rapid Identification and Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing.血流感染的诊断:技术朝着准确、快速鉴定及抗生素敏感性测试的发展
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Apr 12;11(4):511. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11040511.
10
Digital PCR applications for the diagnosis and management of infection in critical care medicine.数字 PCR 在重症监护医学感染诊断和管理中的应用。
Crit Care. 2022 Mar 21;26(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-03948-8.