Greene Zachary K, Robles Augusto A, Lawson Nathaniel C
Division of Biomaterials, UAB School of Dentistry, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA.
Division of General Dentistry, UAB School of Dentistry, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA.
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Jun 20;13(7):276. doi: 10.3390/dj13070276.
: A material incompatibility has been established between self-etching adhesives and amine-containing dual-cure resin composite materials used for core buildups. This study aims to compare the dentin bond strength of several amine-containing and amine-free core materials using self-etching adhesives with different pHs. : Extracted human molars were mounted in acrylic and ground flat with 320-grit silicon carbide paper. Next, 520 specimens (n = 10/group) were assigned to a dual-cure core buildup material group (10 amine-containing, 2 amine-free, and 1 reference light-cure only bulk fill flowable composite) and assigned to a self-etching adhesive subgroup (pH levels of approximately 1.0, 3.0, and 4.0). Within 4 h of surface preparation, the adhesive corresponding to the specimen's subgroup was applied and light-cured. Composite buttons for the assigned dual-cure core material of each group were placed using a bonding clamp apparatus, allowed to self-cure for 2 h at 37 °C, and then unclamped. An additional group with one adhesive (pH = 3.0) was prepared in which the dual-cure core materials were light-cured. The bonded specimens were stored in water at 37 °C for 24 h. The specimens were mounted on a testing clamp and de-bonded in a universal testing machine with a load applied to a circular notched-edge blade at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min until bond failure. The maximum load divided by the area of the button was recorded as the shear bond strength. The data was analyzed via 2-way ANOVA. : The analysis of bond strength via 2-way ANOVA determined statistically significant differences between the adhesives, the core materials, and their interaction ( < 0.01). There was a general trend in shear bond strength for the adhesives, where pH 4.0 > 3.0 > 1.0. The amine-free core materials consistently demonstrated higher shear bond strengths as compared to the other core materials when chemically cured only. Light-curing improved bond strength for some materials with perceived incompatibility. : The results of this study suggest that an incompatibility can exist between self-etching adhesives and dual-cure resin composite core materials. A decrease in the pH of the utilized adhesive corresponded to a decrease in the bond strength of dual-cure core materials when self-curing. This incompatibility may be minimized with the use of core materials formulated with amine-free chemistry. Alternatively, the dual-cure core materials may be light-cured.
自酸蚀粘结剂与用于核修复的含胺双固化树脂复合材料之间已证实存在材料不相容性。本研究旨在比较几种含胺和不含胺的核材料在使用不同pH值的自酸蚀粘结剂时的牙本质粘结强度。
将拔除的人类磨牙固定在丙烯酸树脂中,并用320目碳化硅砂纸磨平。接下来,将520个样本(每组n = 10)分配到双固化核修复材料组(10种含胺的、2种不含胺的以及1种仅用于对照的光固化大容量流动复合树脂),并分配到自酸蚀粘结剂子组(pH值约为1.0、3.0和4.0)。在表面处理后的4小时内,应用与样本所属子组对应的粘结剂并进行光固化。使用粘结夹装置放置每组指定的双固化核材料的复合树脂纽扣,在37℃下自固化2小时,然后松开夹子。另外制备了一组使用一种粘结剂(pH = 3.0)的样本,其中双固化核材料进行光固化。将粘结后的样本在37℃的水中储存24小时。将样本安装在测试夹上,并在万能测试机中脱粘,以1 mm/min的十字头速度将载荷施加到圆形缺口边缘刀片上,直至粘结失效。将最大载荷除以纽扣的面积记录为剪切粘结强度。通过双向方差分析对数据进行分析。
通过双向方差分析对粘结强度的分析确定了粘结剂、核材料及其相互作用之间存在统计学上的显著差异(P < 0.01)。粘结剂的剪切粘结强度存在总体趋势,即pH 4.0 > 3.0 > 1.0。仅在化学固化时,不含胺的核材料始终表现出比其他核材料更高的剪切粘结强度。对于一些存在明显不相容性的材料,光固化提高了粘结强度。
本研究结果表明,自酸蚀粘结剂与双固化树脂复合核材料之间可能存在不相容性。当自固化时,所用粘结剂pH值的降低对应于双固化核材料粘结强度的降低。使用不含胺化学配方的核材料可将这种不相容性降至最低。或者,双固化核材料可以进行光固化。