• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

收集关于健康的社会决定因素的数据以促进加拿大癌症护理中的健康公平:患者和社区的观点

Collecting Data on the Social Determinants of Health to Advance Health Equity in Cancer Care in Canada: Patient and Community Perspectives.

作者信息

Bender Jacqueline L, Tong Eryn, An Ekaterina, Liu Zhihui Amy, Shapiro Gilla K, Avery Jonathan, Chu Alanna, Schulz-Quach Christian, Hales Sarah, Maybee Alies, Sayani Ambreen, Pinto Andrew, Lofters Aisha

机构信息

Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada.

Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7, Canada.

出版信息

Curr Oncol. 2025 Jul 16;32(7):406. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32070406.

DOI:10.3390/curroncol32070406
PMID:40710215
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12293307/
Abstract

Despite advances in cancer care, disparities persist. The collection of the social determinants of health (SDOH) is fundamental to addressing disparities. However, SDOH are inconsistently collected in many regions of the world. This two-phase multiple methods study examined patient and community perspectives regarding SDOH data collection in Canada. In phase 1, a survey was administered to patients at a cancer centre ( = 549) to assess perspectives on an SDOH data collection tool. In phase 2, broader perspectives were sought through a community consultation with patient partners experiencing structural inequality ( = 15). Most participants were comfortable with SDOH data collection. Of survey respondents, 95% were comfortable with the collection of language, birthplace, sex, gender, education, and disability, and 82% to 94% were comfortable with SES, sexual orientation, social support, and race/ethnicity. Discomfort levels did not differ across subgroups, except women were more uncomfortable disclosing SES (OR: 2.00; 95%CI: 1.26, 3.19). Most (71%) preferred face-to-face data collection with a healthcare professional and only half were comfortable with storage of SDOH in electronic health records. Open-ended survey responses ( = 1533) and the community consultation revealed concerns about privacy, discrimination, relevance to care, and data accuracy. SDOH data collection efforts should include a clear rationale for patients, training for providers, strong data privacy and security measures, and actionable strategies to address needs.

摘要

尽管癌症治疗取得了进展,但差异仍然存在。收集健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)是解决差异的基础。然而,世界上许多地区对SDOH的收集并不一致。这项两阶段的多方法研究考察了加拿大患者和社区对SDOH数据收集的看法。在第一阶段,对一家癌症中心的患者(n = 549)进行了一项调查,以评估他们对SDOH数据收集工具的看法。在第二阶段,通过与经历结构性不平等的患者伙伴进行社区咨询(n = 15),寻求更广泛的看法。大多数参与者对SDOH数据收集感到满意。在调查受访者中,95%的人对收集语言、出生地、性别、性取向、教育程度和残疾情况感到满意,82%至94%的人对社会经济地位、性取向、社会支持和种族/族裔情况的收集感到满意。各亚组的不适感没有差异,但女性在披露社会经济地位方面更不舒服(比值比:2.00;95%置信区间:1.26,3.19)。大多数人(71%)更喜欢与医疗保健专业人员进行面对面的数据收集,只有一半的人对在电子健康记录中存储SDOH感到满意。开放式调查回复(n = 1533)和社区咨询揭示了对隐私、歧视、与护理的相关性以及数据准确性的担忧。SDOH数据收集工作应包括向患者说明明确的理由、对提供者进行培训、强有力的数据隐私和安全措施以及满足需求的可操作策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11f6/12293307/2c280793d495/curroncol-32-00406-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11f6/12293307/2c280793d495/curroncol-32-00406-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11f6/12293307/2c280793d495/curroncol-32-00406-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Collecting Data on the Social Determinants of Health to Advance Health Equity in Cancer Care in Canada: Patient and Community Perspectives.收集关于健康的社会决定因素的数据以促进加拿大癌症护理中的健康公平:患者和社区的观点
Curr Oncol. 2025 Jul 16;32(7):406. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32070406.
2
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
3
Are Detailed, Patient-level Social Determinant of Health Factors Associated With Physical Function and Mental Health at Presentation Among New Patients With Orthopaedic Conditions?详细的患者层面的健康社会决定因素是否与新骨科患者就诊时的身体功能和心理健康相关?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 May 1;481(5):912-921. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002446. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
4
A Shadow of Doubt: Is There Implicit Bias Among Orthopaedic Surgery Faculty and Residents Regarding Race and Gender?疑虑重重:骨科手术教员和住院医师在种族和性别方面是否存在隐性偏见?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jul 1;482(7):1145-1155. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002933. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
5
Sex differences in the impact of social determinants of health on substance use disorder treatment outcomes.健康的社会决定因素对物质使用障碍治疗结果影响中的性别差异。
Biol Sex Differ. 2025 Jul 22;16(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13293-025-00734-3.
6
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
7
Addressing Inequalities in Long Covid Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Study on Building Inclusive Services.解决长期新冠医疗保健中的不平等问题:一项关于建立包容性服务的混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70336. doi: 10.1111/hex.70336.
8
Clinician and Patient Perspectives on the Exchange of Sensitive Social Determinants of Health Information.医患双方对交换敏感健康社会决定因素信息的看法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2444376. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.44376.
9
Community and hospital-based healthcare professionals perceptions of digital advance care planning for palliative and end-of-life care: a latent class analysis.社区和医院的医疗保健专业人员对姑息治疗和临终关怀的数字预立医疗计划的看法:一项潜在类别分析。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun 25:1-22. doi: 10.3310/XCGE3294.
10
Do Women and Minority Orthopaedic Residents Report Experiencing Worse Well-being and More Mistreatment Than Their Peers?女性和少数族裔骨科住院医师报告的幸福感是否比同龄人更差,遭受的不当对待是否更多?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Aug 1;482(8):1325-1337. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003015. Epub 2024 Feb 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Mobilizing the Power of Lived/Living Experiences to Improve Health Outcomes for all.调动生活经历的力量,改善所有人的健康状况。
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70212. doi: 10.1111/hex.70212.
2
Progress in site-specific cancer mortality in Canada over the last 70 years.加拿大过去 70 年来特定部位癌症死亡率的变化。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 7;14(1):5688. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56150-x.
3
Screening for poverty and related social determinants to improve knowledge of and links to resources (SPARK): development and cognitive testing of a tool for primary care.
筛查贫困和相关社会决定因素以增强对资源的了解和联系(SPARK):初级保健工具的开发和认知测试。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Nov 25;24(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02173-8.
4
A comparison of the sociodemographic, medical, and psychosocial characteristics of adolescents and young adults diagnosed with cancer recruited in-person and online: A Canadian cross-sectional survey.一项针对通过线下和线上招募的癌症确诊青少年及青年的社会人口学、医学和心理社会特征的比较:一项加拿大横断面调查。
Digit Health. 2023 Oct 25;9:20552076231205278. doi: 10.1177/20552076231205278. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
5
Integration of social determinants of health information within the primary care electronic health record: a systematic review of patient perspectives and experiences.将健康信息的社会决定因素整合到基层医疗电子健康记录中:对患者观点和经历的系统评价
BJGP Open. 2024 Apr 25;8(1). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0155. Print 2024 Apr.
6
A Mixed-Methods Study to Evaluate the Feasibility and Acceptability of Implementing an Electronic Health Record Social Determinants of Health Screening Instrument into Routine Clinical Oncology Practice.一项混合方法研究,旨在评估将电子健康记录健康筛查工具中的社会决定因素纳入常规临床肿瘤学实践的可行性和可接受性。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Nov;30(12):7299-7308. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14124-9. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
7
Review of current 2SLGBTQIA+ inequities in the Canadian health care system.加拿大医疗保健系统中当前 2SLGBTQIA+ 不平等现象的综述。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 18;11:1183284. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1183284. eCollection 2023.
8
"Addressing the bigger picture": A qualitative study of internal medicine patients' perspectives on social needs data collection and use.“关注大局”:一项针对内科患者对社会需求数据收集和使用的看法的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 7;18(6):e0285795. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285795. eCollection 2023.
9
Minority stress theory: Application, critique, and continued relevance.少数群体应激理论:应用、批判与持续相关性。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2023 Jun;51:101579. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101579. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
10
Social Determinants of Health Screening and Management: Lessons at a Large, Urban Academic Health System.健康的社会决定因素筛查和管理:在一个大型城市学术卫生系统中的经验教训。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2023 Jun-Jul;49(6-7):328-332. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2023.04.002. Epub 2023 Apr 22.