Pantea Mihaela, Ciocan Lucian Toma, Vasilescu Vlad Gabriel, Voicu Georgeta, Nicoară Adrian-Ionut, Miculescu Florin, Ciocoiu Robert, Țâncu Ana Maria Cristina, Banu Elena Georgiana, Imre Marina
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 37 Dionisie Lupu Street, District 2, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.
Department of Dental Prostheses Technology, Faculty of Dentistry, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 37 Dionisie Lupu Street, District 2, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.
J Funct Biomater. 2025 Jul 16;16(7):263. doi: 10.3390/jfb16070263.
This in vitro study aimed to compare the effects of various surface treatments and hydrothermal aging on the phase composition, microstructure, and compressive strength of dental zirconia (ZrO). Forty-eight zirconia cubes (8 × 8 × 8 mm) were fabricated using CAD/CAM from two materials: infrastructure zirconia (Group S1) and super-translucent multilayered monolithic zirconia (Group S2). Four samples of each material were analyzed in their pre-sintered state (S1-0, S2-0). The remaining specimens were sintered and assigned to sub-groups based on surface treatment: untreated, sandblasted with 30 µm or 50 µm AlO, polished, or polished and glazed. Characterization was performed using EDX, SEM, XRD with Rietveld refinement, Raman spectroscopy, and compressive testing before and after accelerated hydrothermal aging, according to EN ISO 13356:2015. EDX revealed a higher yttria content in monolithic zirconia (10.57 wt%) than in infrastructure zirconia (6.51 wt%). SEM images showed minimal changes in polished samples but clear surface damage after sandblasting, which was more pronounced with larger abrasive particles. XRD and Raman confirmed that sandblasting promoted the tetragonal (t-ZrO) to monoclinic (m-ZrO) phase transformation (t→m), amplified further by hydrothermal aging. The polished groups showed greater phase stability post-aging. Compressive strength decreased in all treated and aged samples, with monolithic zirconia being more affected. Polished samples displayed the best surface quality and structural resilience across both materials. These findings underline the impact of clinical surface treatments on zirconia's long-term mechanical and structural behavior.
这项体外研究旨在比较各种表面处理和水热老化对牙科氧化锆(ZrO)的相组成、微观结构和抗压强度的影响。使用CAD/CAM从两种材料制备了48个氧化锆立方体(8×8×8毫米):基础氧化锆(S1组)和超透明多层整体式氧化锆(S2组)。每种材料的四个样品在预烧结状态下进行分析(S1-0,S2-0)。其余样品进行烧结,并根据表面处理分为亚组:未处理、用30 µm或50 µm AlO喷砂、抛光或抛光并上釉。根据EN ISO 13356:2015,在加速水热老化前后,使用能谱仪(EDX)、扫描电子显微镜(SEM)、带有Rietveld精修的X射线衍射仪(XRD)、拉曼光谱仪和抗压测试进行表征。能谱仪显示整体式氧化锆中的氧化钇含量(10.57 wt%)高于基础氧化锆(6.51 wt%)。扫描电子显微镜图像显示抛光样品变化最小,但喷砂后表面有明显损伤,较大的磨料颗粒造成的损伤更明显。X射线衍射和拉曼光谱证实喷砂促进了四方相(t-ZrO)向单斜相(m-ZrO)的相变(t→m),水热老化进一步放大了这种相变。抛光组在老化后表现出更高的相稳定性。所有处理和老化后的样品抗压强度均下降,整体式氧化锆受影响更大。在两种材料中,抛光样品均表现出最佳的表面质量和结构韧性。这些发现强调了临床表面处理对氧化锆长期力学和结构行为的影响。