Student Research Committee, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental Materials Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2024 Jun;10(3):e884. doi: 10.1002/cre2.884.
This study compared the effects of glazing versus polishing on mechanical, optical, and surface properties of zirconia ceramics with different translucencies.
In this in vitro study, 120 bar-shaped specimens (25 × 4 × 1.2 mm) were fabricated from three different types of zirconia with different translucencies (n = 40, DD Bio ZW, ZX2, and Cube X2). After sintering, each zirconia group was randomly divided into five subgroups of control (glazing), glazing + bur abrasion, glazing + bur abrasion + polishing with EVE Diacera® kit, glazing + bur abrasion + reglazing, and glazing + bur abrasion + polishing with EVE Diacera® kit + reglazing. The specimens underwent surface roughness, hardness, flexural strength, and translucency tests, as well as X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for assessment of surface topography. Data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance, Tukey test, and Pearson test (α = .05).
Flexural strength, surface hardness, and translucency were significantly correlated with zirconia type. ZW zirconia had significantly higher flexural strength and surface hardness and significantly lower translucency than Cube X2 and ZX2 (p < .001). Surface roughness had no significant correlation with zirconia type (p = .274). Polishing created the smoothest, and bur abrasion created the roughest surface (p < .001). Flexural strength and hardness in most experimental groups were significantly lower than in the control group (p < .001). Translucency was not significantly different in bur abrasion and polishing groups, compared with the control group; however, reglazing significantly increased the translucency (p < .001). SEM micrographs confirmed the surface roughness results. XRD showed monoclinic phase only in reglazed groups.
Of different surface treatments, polishing improved the surface properties and caused the smallest change in mechanical properties of zirconia with different translucencies.
本研究比较了上釉与抛光对不同透明度氧化锆陶瓷机械性能、光学性能和表面性能的影响。
本体外研究中,使用三种不同透明度的氧化锆(DD Bio ZW、ZX2 和 Cube X2)制备 120 个条形试件(25×4×1.2mm)(n=40)。烧结后,将每种氧化锆组随机分为 5 个亚组,分别为对照组(上釉)、上釉+砂布打磨、上釉+砂布打磨+EVE Diacera®套件抛光、上釉+砂布打磨+重新上釉和上釉+砂布打磨+EVE Diacera®套件抛光+重新上釉。对试件进行表面粗糙度、硬度、弯曲强度和透光率测试,同时进行 X 射线衍射(XRD)和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)分析,以评估表面形貌。采用单因素方差分析、Tukey 检验和 Pearson 检验(α=0.05)进行数据分析。
弯曲强度、表面硬度和透光率与氧化锆类型显著相关。ZW 氧化锆的弯曲强度和表面硬度显著高于 Cube X2 和 ZX2,透光率显著低于 Cube X2 和 ZX2(p<0.001)。表面粗糙度与氧化锆类型无显著相关性(p=0.274)。抛光处理后表面最光滑,砂布打磨后表面最粗糙(p<0.001)。大多数实验组的弯曲强度和硬度均显著低于对照组(p<0.001)。与对照组相比,砂布打磨和抛光组的透光率无显著差异;然而,重新上釉显著提高了透光率(p<0.001)。SEM 显微照片证实了表面粗糙度结果。XRD 显示仅在上釉组中出现单斜相。
在不同的表面处理方法中,抛光处理改善了氧化锆的表面性能,对不同透明度氧化锆的机械性能影响最小。