Clua-Espuny Jose L, Panisello-Tafalla Anna, Lucas-Noll Jorgina, Muria-Subirats Eulàlia, Forcadell-Arenas Teresa, Carrera-Ortiz Juan M, Molto-Balado Pedro, Clua-Queralt Josep, Fusté-Anguera Immaculada, Reverte-Vilarroya Silvia
Institut Català de la Salut, SAP Terres de l'Ebre, 43500 Tortosa, Spain.
Ebrictus Research Group, Research Support Unit Terres de l'Ebre, Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció, Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), 43500 Tortosa, Spain.
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 Jul 5;12(7):259. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12070259.
(1) Background: In the absence of locally validated tools, the CHA2DS2-VA score has been suggested as a substitute for the CHA2DS2-VASc score. This study compared the potential discrepancies between these scores. (2) Methods: The observational, retrospective, and community-based study included a cohort of 3370 patients with a new diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF) between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2024. (3) Results: AF prevalence was 8.4%, which was significantly higher in men. The mean age was 80.1 (SD ± 6.24) years. Women (42.8%) were older (80.9 SD ± 6.1 vs. 79.5 SD ± 6.23; < 0.001). Men had more instances of diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, coronary artery disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, as well as a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index. Conversely, women exhibited a higher proportion ≥75 years, including cognitive impairment, dyslipidemia, and higher stroke risk, as assessed by the CHA2DS2-VASc score ( < 0.001) but not by the CHA2DS2-VA score ( = 0.071). The CHA2DS2-VA score reduced the sex-based risk stratification differences, and only 3.2% of women were reclassified as being at very low risk (CHA2DS2-VA < 2). (4) Conclusions: The CHA2DS2-VA score notably redefined sex-based thromboembolic risk stratification profiles, with no sex-based disparities in the selection of OAC treatment modality. The clinical utility of CHA2DS2-VA remains a subject of ongoing debate.
(1) 背景:在缺乏本地验证工具的情况下,有人建议用CHA2DS2-VA评分替代CHA2DS2-VASc评分。本研究比较了这两种评分之间可能存在的差异。(2) 方法:这项基于社区的观察性回顾研究纳入了2015年1月1日至2024年12月31日期间新诊断为房颤(AF)的3370例患者队列。(3) 结果:房颤患病率为8.4%,男性患病率显著更高。平均年龄为80.1(标准差±6.24)岁。女性(42.8%)年龄更大(80.9标准差±6.1 vs. 79.5标准差±6.23;P<0.001)。男性患糖尿病、外周血管疾病、冠状动脉疾病和慢性阻塞性肺疾病的情况更多,Charlson合并症指数也更高。相反,女性≥75岁的比例更高,包括认知障碍、血脂异常,且根据CHA2DS2-VASc评分评估的中风风险更高(P<0.001),但根据CHA2DS2-VA评分评估则不然(P = 0.071)。CHA2DS2-VA评分缩小了基于性别的风险分层差异,只有3.2%的女性被重新分类为极低风险(CHA2DS2-VA<2)。(4) 结论:CHA2DS2-VA评分显著重新定义了基于性别的血栓栓塞风险分层概况,在选择口服抗凝药治疗方式方面不存在基于性别的差异。CHA2DS2-VA的临床效用仍是一个持续争论的话题。