• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

整合医学教育连续过程中健康倡导能力的概念:一项范围综述方案。

Bringing together conceptualisations of the health advocacy competence across the continuum of medical education: a scoping review protocol.

作者信息

Oosthoek Wilma R W, Cecilio-Fernandes Dario, Engel Maarten F M, van Prooijen Lars T, Otto Suzie J, Woltman Andrea M

机构信息

Institute for Medical Education Research Rotterdam, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Institute for Medical Education Research Rotterdam, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 25;15(7):e097894. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097894.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097894
PMID:40713040
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12306260/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Health advocacy (HA) is acknowledged as a core competence in medical education. However, varying and sometimes conflicting conceptualisations of HA exist, making it challenging to integrate the competence consistently. While this diversity highlights the need for a deeper understanding of HA conceptualisations, a comprehensive analysis across the continuum of medical education is absent in the literature. This protocol has been developed to clarify the conceptual dimensions of the HA competence in literature as applied to medical education.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The review will be conducted in line with the JBI (formerly Joanna Briggs Institute) methodology for scoping reviews. A comprehensive literature search was developed and already carried out in eight academic databases and Google Scholar, without restrictions on publication date, geography or language. Articles that describe the HA role among students and physicians who receive or provide medical education will be eligible for inclusion. Two independent reviewers will independently complete title and abstract screening prior to full-text review of selected articles and data extraction on the final set. A descriptive-analytical approach will be applied for summarising the data.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This scoping review does not involve human participants, as all evidence is sourced from publicly available databases. Therefore, ethical approval is not required for this study. The findings from this scoping review will be disseminated through submission to a high-quality peer-reviewed journal and presented at academic conferences. By clarifying the conceptualisations of HA, this review aims to contribute to a shared narrative that will strengthen the foundation for integrating the HA role into medical education.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

A preliminary version of this protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework on 9 December 2024, and can be accessed at the following link: https://osf.io/ed2br. We have also registered our scoping review protocol as a preprint at medRxiv: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.09.24318699.

摘要

引言

健康倡导(HA)被公认为医学教育中的一项核心能力。然而,对于HA存在不同且有时相互冲突的概念界定,这使得持续整合该能力具有挑战性。虽然这种多样性凸显了深入理解HA概念界定的必要性,但文献中缺乏对医学教育连续统一体的全面分析。本方案旨在阐明文献中应用于医学教育的HA能力的概念维度。

方法与分析

本综述将按照循证卫生保健国际协作网(原乔安娜·布里格斯循证卫生保健中心)的范围综述方法进行。已制定并已在八个学术数据库和谷歌学术上进行了全面的文献检索,对出版日期、地域或语言均无限制。描述接受或提供医学教育的学生和医生中HA角色的文章将符合纳入标准。两名独立评审员将在对选定文章进行全文评审和对最终选定文章进行数据提取之前,独立完成标题和摘要筛选。将采用描述性分析方法汇总数据。

伦理与传播

本范围综述不涉及人类参与者,因为所有证据均来自公开可用的数据库。因此,本研究无需伦理批准。本范围综述的结果将通过提交给高质量的同行评审期刊并在学术会议上展示来进行传播。通过阐明HA的概念界定,本综述旨在促成一种共同的叙述,以加强将HA角色纳入医学教育的基础。

试验注册号

本方案的初稿于2024年12月9日在开放科学框架上注册,可通过以下链接访问:https://osf.io/ed2br。我们还已将我们的范围综述方案作为预印本在medRxiv上注册:https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.09.24318699。

相似文献

1
Bringing together conceptualisations of the health advocacy competence across the continuum of medical education: a scoping review protocol.整合医学教育连续过程中健康倡导能力的概念:一项范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 25;15(7):e097894. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097894.
2
Impact of the Exposome in Type 1 Diabetes: Protocol for a Scoping Review.暴露组对1型糖尿病的影响:一项范围综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jul 17;14:e73424. doi: 10.2196/73424.
3
Spatial and spatio-temporal analysis for malaria hotspot identification: a scoping review protocol.用于疟疾热点地区识别的空间和时空分析:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 6;15(6):e101375. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101375.
4
Functional Elements of Entrusted Professional Activities for Dental Educators: Protocol for a Scoping Review.牙科教育工作者委托专业活动的功能要素:范围审查方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jun 25;14:e74225. doi: 10.2196/74225.
5
Quality indicators for substance use disorder care: a scoping review protocol.物质使用障碍护理的质量指标:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 29;15(3):e085216. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085216.
6
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
7
Vitamin B12 deficiency in long-term metformin use and clinician awareness: a scoping review protocol.长期使用二甲双胍导致的维生素B12缺乏与临床医生认知:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 22;15(7):e101016. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101016.
8
Physical and psychological consequences on nurses affected by workplace violence: a scoping review protocol.工作场所暴力对护士的生理和心理影响:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 30;15(7):e105171. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105171.
9
Addressing the Socioemotional Dimension of Medical Education: Protocol for a Scoping Review of Student-Driven Development Strategies.关注医学教育的社会情感维度:学生驱动发展策略的范围综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jul 24;14:e66757. doi: 10.2196/66757.
10
Hospital at home digital twin for the management of patients with frailty: a scoping review protocol.用于虚弱患者管理的居家医院数字孪生:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 17;15(6):e093418. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093418.

本文引用的文献

1
Conceptualization and teaching health advocacy in undergraduate medical education: a document analysis.本科医学教育中的健康倡导概念化和教学:文献分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Sep 28;24(1):1064. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06039-0.
2
Through a Tainted Lens: A Qualitatve Study of Medical Learners' Thinking About Patient 'Deservingness' of Health Advocacy.透过扭曲的镜头:医学学习者对患者健康倡导“应得性”的思考的定性研究。
Perspect Med Educ. 2024 Feb 23;13(1):151-159. doi: 10.5334/pme.1314. eCollection 2024.
3
Advocacy Curricula in Graduate Medical Education: an Updated Systematic Review from 2017 to 2022.
研究生医学教育中的倡导课程:2017 年至 2022 年的更新系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Sep;38(12):2792-2807. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08244-x. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
4
Grappling with key questions about assessment of the Health Advocate role.应对健康倡导人角色评估中的关键问题
Can Med Educ J. 2023 Mar 21;14(1):80-89. doi: 10.36834/cmej.73878. eCollection 2023 Mar.
5
Planetary Health in CanMEDS 2025.《2025年加拿大医学教育认证委员会(CanMEDS)框架下的行星健康》
Can Med Educ J. 2023 Mar 21;14(1):46-49. doi: 10.36834/cmej.75438. eCollection 2023 Mar.
6
Health advocacy among medical learners: Unpacking contextual barriers and affordances.医学学习者中的健康倡导:剖析情境障碍和促成因素。
Med Educ. 2023 Jul;57(7):658-667. doi: 10.1111/medu.15001. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
7
Social accountability in undergraduate medical education: A narrative review.本科医学教育中的社会责任:叙事性综述。
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2022 Jan-Apr;35(1):3-8. doi: 10.4103/efh.efh_305_21.
8
Expanding the advocacy lens: using photo-elicitation to capture patients' and physicians' perspectives about health advocacy.拓展倡导视角:运用影像诱发技术捕捉患者和医生对健康倡导的看法。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2023 May;28(2):411-426. doi: 10.1007/s10459-022-10162-2. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
9
Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews.综述的提取、分析和结果呈现建议。
JBI Evid Synth. 2023 Mar 1;21(3):520-532. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-22-00123.
10
Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols.范围综述方案制定的最佳实践指南及报告项目
JBI Evid Synth. 2022 Apr 1;20(4):953-968. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-21-00242.