• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响肺癌筛查项目导航员角色的因素的定性评估

A Qualitative Evaluation of Factors Influencing the Lung Cancer Screening Program Navigator Role.

作者信息

Spalluto Lucy B, Bonnet Kemberlee, Schlundt David, Audet Carolyn M, Henschke Claudia I, Yankelevitz David F, York Sally J, Hendler Fred, Dittus Robert S, Moghanaki Drew, Roumie Christianne L, Lewis Jennifer A

机构信息

Geriatric Research Educational and Clinical Center (GRECC) and the VETWISE-LHS Center of Innovation, VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN, USA.

Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Jul 25. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09714-0.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-025-09714-0
PMID:40715955
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer screening program navigators improve adherence and patient experience. However, little is known about how navigators improve program outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this qualitative study was to explore factors influencing the lung cancer screening program navigator role.

DESIGN

From December 2020 to September 2021, we conducted a cross-sectional qualitative study of in-depth interviews in the Veterans Health Administration.

PARTICIPANTS

We interviewed a national sample of healthcare team members involved in lung cancer screening at 10 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers.

APPROACH

We performed interviews to elicit data on lung cancer screening team and organizational characteristics, barriers to and facilitators of lung cancer screening, and factors influencing the navigator role. We utilized an iterative inductive-deductive approach for qualitative analysis based on the health systems science framework and relational coordination theory.

PARTICIPANTS

We conducted 30 interviews (participation rate = 56%). The 30 participants were predominantly physicians (47%), in primary care (33%), and with 1-10 years of experience in current role (37%).

KEY RESULTS

Participants indicated that both structural and relational factors influence the lung cancer screening program navigator role. Specifically, organizational support to strengthen the navigator's ability to function as a boundary spanner emerged as a key factor that can influence program outcomes such as efficient enrollment practices and program growth.

CONCLUSIONS

Healthcare team members involved in lung cancer screening indicated that navigators play an important role in impacting lung cancer screening programs. As lung cancer screening programs continue to evolve and expand, developing organizational structure and relational coordination to support navigators can positively impact program outcomes.

摘要

背景

肺癌筛查项目导航员可提高依从性和患者体验。然而,对于导航员如何改善项目成果知之甚少。

目的

这项定性研究的目的是探讨影响肺癌筛查项目导航员角色的因素。

设计

2020年12月至2021年9月,我们在退伍军人健康管理局进行了一项深入访谈的横断面定性研究。

参与者

我们采访了10家退伍军人事务医疗中心参与肺癌筛查的医疗团队成员的全国样本。

方法

我们进行访谈以获取有关肺癌筛查团队和组织特征、肺癌筛查的障碍和促进因素以及影响导航员角色的因素的数据。我们基于卫生系统科学框架和关系协调理论,采用迭代归纳-演绎方法进行定性分析。

参与者

我们进行了30次访谈(参与率=56%)。30名参与者主要是医生(47%),从事初级保健工作(33%),在当前岗位有1至10年工作经验(37%)。

主要结果

参与者表示,结构因素和关系因素都会影响肺癌筛查项目导航员的角色。具体而言,加强导航员作为边界跨越者功能的组织支持成为影响项目成果(如高效登记做法和项目发展)的关键因素。

结论

参与肺癌筛查的医疗团队成员表示,导航员在影响肺癌筛查项目方面发挥着重要作用。随着肺癌筛查项目不断发展和扩大,发展组织结构和关系协调以支持导航员可对项目成果产生积极影响。

相似文献

1
A Qualitative Evaluation of Factors Influencing the Lung Cancer Screening Program Navigator Role.影响肺癌筛查项目导航员角色的因素的定性评估
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Jul 25. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09714-0.
2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
3
Patient navigator programmes for children and adolescents with chronic diseases.慢性病患儿和青少年的患者导航员计划。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 9;10(10):CD014688. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014688.pub2.
4
Barriers and facilitators of inpatients and healthcare professionals prior to the implementation of a Multidisciplinary Lifestyle-Focused Approach in the Treatment of Inpatients With Mental Illness (MULTI+): The MULTI+ Study II.在采用多学科生活方式为重点的方法治疗精神病住院患者(MULTI+)之前,住院患者和医护人员面临的障碍与促进因素:MULTI+研究II
Implement Res Pract. 2025 Jul 6;6:26334895251351663. doi: 10.1177/26334895251351663. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
5
Experiences of cancer patients in a patient navigation program: a qualitative systematic review.癌症患者在患者导航计划中的经历:一项定性系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Mar 12;13(2):136-68. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1588.
6
Ambulatory Oxygen for Pulmonary Fibrosis (OxyPuF): a randomised controlled trial and acceptability study.用于肺纤维化的门诊氧疗(OxyPuF):一项随机对照试验和可接受性研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul 2:1-33. doi: 10.3310/TWKS4194.
7
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
8
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
9
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对土壤传播蠕虫群体药物给药的看法:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.
10
Factors that influence participation in physical activity for people with bipolar disorder: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.影响双相障碍患者参与体育活动的因素:定性证据的综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 4;6(6):CD013557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013557.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Rural barriers and facilitators of lung cancer screening program implementation in the veterans health administration: a qualitative study.退伍军人健康管理局中肺癌筛查项目实施的农村障碍与促进因素:一项定性研究
Front Health Serv. 2023 Aug 22;3:1209720. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2023.1209720. eCollection 2023.
2
Patient navigation across the cancer care continuum: An overview of systematic reviews and emerging literature.癌症诊疗全程中的患者导航:系统评价和新兴文献概述。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2023 Nov-Dec;73(6):565-589. doi: 10.3322/caac.21788. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
3
Proactive Recruitment Strategy for Patient Identification for Lung Cancer Screening.
主动招募策略用于肺癌筛查患者识别。
Ann Fam Med. 2023 Mar-Apr;21(2):119-124. doi: 10.1370/afm.2905.
4
Using the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Expanded (FRAME) to study adaptations in lung cancer screening delivery in the Veterans Health Administration: a cohort study.使用扩展版的报告适应与修改框架(FRAME)来研究退伍军人健康管理局肺癌筛查服务中的适应情况:一项队列研究。
Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Jan 12;4(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00388-x.
5
The Association of Health Care System Resources With Lung Cancer Screening Implementation: A Cohort Study.医疗保健系统资源与肺癌筛查实施的关联:一项队列研究。
Chest. 2022 Sep;162(3):701-711. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.03.050. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
6
Guideline-Recommended Lung Cancer Screening Adherence Is Superior With a Centralized Approach.采用集中式方法时,指南推荐的肺癌筛查依从性更佳。
Chest. 2022 Mar;161(3):818-825. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.09.002. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
7
Protocol to evaluate an enterprise-wide initiative to increase access to lung cancer screening in the Veterans Health Administration.评估一项旨在增加退伍军人事务部肺癌筛查机会的全企业倡议的方案。
Clin Imaging. 2021 May;73:151-161. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.11.059. Epub 2020 Dec 26.
8
Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Volume CT Screening in a Randomized Trial.随机试验中 CT 容积筛查降低肺癌死亡率
N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 6;382(6):503-513. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1911793. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
9
Association of a Lung Screening Program Coordinator With Adherence to Annual CT Lung Screening at a Large Academic Institution.大型学术机构中肺部筛查项目协调员与年度CT肺部筛查依从性的关联
J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Feb;17(2):208-215. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.08.010. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
10
Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization.定性研究中的饱和度:探索其概念化与操作化
Qual Quant. 2018;52(4):1893-1907. doi: 10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8. Epub 2017 Sep 14.