Hoek Janet, Waa Andrew, Edwards Richard, Gregan Melissa-Jade, Graham-DeMello Anna
Department of Public Health, Ōtākou Whakaihu Waka Pōneke | University of Otago, Wellington, Aotearoa New Zealand.
Rōpū Rangahau Hauora a Eru Pōmare, Department of Public Health, Ōtākou Whakaihu Waka Pōneke | University of Otago, Wellington, Aotearoa New Zealand.
J R Soc N Z. 2025 Apr 10;55(5):1190-1208. doi: 10.1080/03036758.2025.2455498. eCollection 2025.
Smoking causes at least 16 different cancers and has resulted in persistent health inequities. Aotearoa New Zealand was initially a Tupeka Kore (Tobacco Free) nation and Māori leaders have led calls for measures that would end the harms smoking imposes. Their vision inspired a national movement and later saw a new law introduced that mandated denicotinisation, reduced the supply of tobacco, and introduced a smokefree generation. The National-led coalition Government repealed these measures, drawing on arguments often advanced by tobacco companies. Using the Policy Dystopia Model, we analysed tobacco industry narratives and reviewed politicians' use of industry arguments. We found coalition Government members drew on prohibition and illicit trade arguments, which segued into public safety concerns, despite weak evidence for these claims. To protect innovative public health policies, we argue for stronger lobbying regulation to reduce tobacco companies' ability to interfere with policy making and improve compliance with Article 5.3 of the World Health Organization's Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Stronger regulation of lobbying would protect critical public health policies that could profoundly reduce cancer rates from commercial interests.
吸烟导致至少16种不同的癌症,并造成了持续存在的健康不平等现象。新西兰最初是一个无烟国家,毛利族领导人带头呼吁采取措施,以消除吸烟造成的危害。他们的愿景激发了一场全国性运动,后来出台了一项新法律,规定进行去尼古丁化、减少烟草供应,并推行无烟一代政策。由国家党领导的联合政府废除了这些措施,其所依据的论点往往是烟草公司经常提出的。我们运用政策反乌托邦模型,分析了烟草行业的说辞,并审视了政客们对行业论点的运用。我们发现,联合政府成员采用了禁令和非法贸易论点,这些论点进而演变成对公共安全的担忧,尽管这些说法缺乏有力证据。为保护创新的公共卫生政策,我们主张加强游说监管,以削弱烟草公司干扰政策制定的能力,并提高对世界卫生组织《烟草控制框架公约》第5.3条的遵守程度。加强游说监管将保护关键的公共卫生政策,使其免受商业利益的影响,从而有可能大幅降低癌症发病率。