Rajkumar Theepika, Hu Sharon, Hennessy Annemarie, Makris Angela
School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Department of Medicine, Campbelltown Hospital, South Western Sydney Local Health, Liverpool, NSW, Australia.
Digit Health. 2025 Jul 22;11:20552076251317567. doi: 10.1177/20552076251317567. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
Remote blood pressure monitoring (RBPM) is a promising method for surveilling hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP). This refers to an organised framework in which clinicians can review and manage patient-obtained blood pressure recordings. Successful integration of RBPM into routine antenatal care necessitates understanding patient and clinician perspectives of its use. This study sought to evaluate the perceptions of high-risk pregnant women and clinicians regarding RBPM's use in HDP surveillance.
A web-based questionnaire was distributed to pregnant women in South Western Sydney and clinicians across Australia and New Zealand. Quantitative Likert scales and qualitative open-ended questions were used to ascertain perceptions about RBPM for the surveillance of HDP.
Seventy-six women responded to the patient survey, with a response rate of 74.5%. A total of 65 clinicians responded to the healthcare professional survey. Almost all women (97.4%) supported RBPM's potential to aid healthcare decisions, with 96.1% willing to incorporate RBPM into antenatal care. Linear regression revealed implementation of RBPM was particularly supported by women who had less time off from paid employment during their pregnancy ( < 0.001). Conversely, women from non-English-speaking backgrounds and lower-income groups perceived RBPM as more challenging to use ( = 0.011 and = 0.017, respectively). Most clinicians were concerned about the security of data transfer and storage interfaces. Poor accuracy or reliability of the technology emerged as a common barrier amongst both women and clinicians. Free-text responses revealed novel themes including accountability of care and medicolegal ramifications.
Though socioeconomic status, ethnicity and language influenced perceptions towards RBPM; overall, Australian pregnant women and clinicians are broadly receptive to its use in antenatal care. Successful implementation of RPBM requires careful evaluation of design and workflow to accommodate for patient diversity, ease of use, compliance, privacy and clinical utility to optimise the user experience.
远程血压监测(RBPM)是一种用于监测妊娠高血压疾病(HDP)的很有前景的方法。这是一个有组织的框架,临床医生可以在此框架内查看和管理患者自行测量的血压记录。要将RBPM成功整合到常规产前护理中,需要了解患者和临床医生对其使用的看法。本研究旨在评估高危孕妇和临床医生对RBPM用于HDP监测的看法。
向悉尼西南部的孕妇以及澳大利亚和新西兰的临床医生发放了一份基于网络的问卷。使用定量李克特量表和定性开放式问题来确定对RBPM用于HDP监测的看法。
76名女性回复了患者调查问卷,回复率为74.5%。共有65名临床医生回复了医疗专业人员调查问卷。几乎所有女性(97.4%)都支持RBPM有助于医疗决策的潜力,96.1%的女性愿意将RBPM纳入产前护理。线性回归显示,怀孕期间带薪休假时间较少的女性对RBPM的实施特别支持(<0.001)。相反,来自非英语背景和低收入群体的女性认为使用RBPM更具挑战性(分别为=0.011和=0.017)。大多数临床医生担心数据传输和存储接口的安全性。技术准确性或可靠性差是女性和临床医生共同面临的常见障碍。自由文本回复揭示了新的主题,包括护理责任和法医学后果。
尽管社会经济地位、种族和语言会影响对RBPM的看法;总体而言,澳大利亚孕妇和临床医生普遍接受在产前护理中使用RBPM。成功实施RBPM需要仔细评估设计和工作流程,以适应患者的多样性、易用性、依从性、隐私性和临床实用性,从而优化用户体验。