Suppr超能文献

产房复苏中基于证据的实践的接受与实施:一项定性研究。

Acceptance and implementation of evidence-based practices in delivery room resuscitation: A qualitative study.

作者信息

Corson Cecelia L, Nembhard Ingrid M, Bonafide Christopher P, Foglia Elizabeth E, Lee Henry C, Handley Sara C

机构信息

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.

The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, 3733 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.

出版信息

SSM Qual Res Health. 2025 Jun;7. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100557. Epub 2025 Apr 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Variation persists in the implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) for delivery room resuscitation associated with high-quality care. To date, research has often studied leaders and rarely focused on the perspectives of delivery room resuscitation team members. We investigated team member perspectives on facilitators and barriers to accepting and implementing EBPs in delivery room resuscitation.

METHODS

This is a qualitative analysis of responses to open-ended questions in a twice-administered survey of delivery room resuscitation team members from a 16-hospital network. We conducted a two-phase content analysis, I) inductive conventional content analysis and II) deductive directed content analysis, to map response themes onto the three elements of the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) framework - evidence, facilitation, and context.

RESULTS

There were 569 responses from 322 individuals representing all delivery room resuscitation team member roles. We identified five main themes that influence acceptance and implementation of EBPs: evidence, education, process characteristics, leadership, and change mindset. These themes aligned with the PARIHS framework elements of Evidence, Facilitation (occurring through education and process characteristics), and Context (determined by leadership and change mindset). We identified 12 sub-themes; 9 applied to both acceptance and implementation of EBPs, 1 applied only to acceptance of EBPs, and 2 applied only to implementation of EBPs.

CONCLUSIONS

While many facilitators and barriers are consistent for both acceptance and implementation, some differ. To optimize EBPs in delivery room resuscitation, organizations may benefit from tailoring interventions to incorporate facilitators and address barriers that influence EBP acceptance and/or implementation.

摘要

背景

与高质量护理相关的产房复苏循证实践(EBPs)的实施仍存在差异。迄今为止,研究通常关注领导者,很少关注产房复苏团队成员的观点。我们调查了团队成员对在产房复苏中接受和实施循证实践的促进因素和障碍的看法。

方法

这是对来自一个16家医院网络的产房复苏团队成员进行的两次调查中对开放式问题的回答的定性分析。我们进行了两阶段的内容分析,I)归纳式传统内容分析和II)演绎式定向内容分析,以将回答主题映射到卫生服务研究实施促进行动(PARIHS)框架的三个要素——证据、促进和背景上。

结果

来自322名个体的569份回答代表了所有产房复苏团队成员的角色。我们确定了影响循证实践接受和实施的五个主要主题:证据、教育、过程特征、领导力和变革心态。这些主题与PARIHS框架的要素一致,即证据、促进(通过教育和过程特征实现)和背景(由领导力和变革心态决定)。我们确定了12个子主题;9个适用于循证实践的接受和实施,1个仅适用于循证实践的接受,2个仅适用于循证实践的实施。

结论

虽然许多促进因素和障碍在接受和实施方面是一致的,但也有一些不同。为了优化产房复苏中的循证实践,组织可能会受益于量身定制干预措施,纳入促进因素并解决影响循证实践接受和/或实施的障碍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0091/12290897/219fd61d9c01/nihms-2089393-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Acceptance and implementation of evidence-based practices in delivery room resuscitation: A qualitative study.
SSM Qual Res Health. 2025 Jun;7. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100557. Epub 2025 Apr 1.
5
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.
6
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
9
Factors that influence participation in physical activity for people with bipolar disorder: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 4;6(6):CD013557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013557.pub2.
10
The Lived Experience of Autistic Adults in Employment: A Systematic Search and Synthesis.
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):495-509. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0114. eCollection 2024 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of leadership interventions on neonatal care: a systematic review of current literature.
Eur J Pediatr. 2025 Jan 11;184(2):126. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05968-8.
3
Teaching team competencies within resuscitation training: A systematic review.
Resusc Plus. 2024 Jun 18;19:100687. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100687. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
The role of nursing leadership in promoting evidence-based nursing practice.
J Prof Nurs. 2023 Sep-Oct;48:93-98. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2023.06.007. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
6
Quality improvement for neonatal resuscitation and delivery room care.
Semin Perinatol. 2022 Oct;46(6):151629. doi: 10.1016/j.semperi.2022.151629. Epub 2022 May 21.
7
Updates for the Neonatal Resuscitation Program and Resuscitation Guidelines.
Neoreviews. 2022 Apr 1;23(4):e238-e249. doi: 10.1542/neo.23-4-e238.
8
Best Practices for Education and Training of Resuscitation Teams for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2021 Dec;14(12):e008587. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.121.008587. Epub 2021 Nov 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验