Suppr超能文献

传统与当代孕产妇死亡原因识别模型:一项基于人群的研究

Traditional Versus Contemporary Models for Identifying Causes of Maternal Death: A Population-Based Study.

作者信息

Sabr Yasser, Lisonkova Sarka, Boutin Amélie, Mayer Chantal, Joseph K S

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia and the Children's and Women's Hospital and Health Centre of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

BJOG. 2025 Oct;132(11):1689-1696. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.18298. Epub 2025 Jul 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine differences in cause-of-maternal-death assignment based on underlying versus multiple causes of death.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional, population-based study.

SETTING

United States, 1999-2002 and 2018-2022.

POPULATION

1633 maternal deaths in 1999-2002 and 1929 maternal deaths in 2018-2022.

METHODS

Causes of death were identified based on the underlying cause of death and also based on multiple causes of death. The frequency of six selected obstetrical causes of death was quantified and ranked.

RESULTS

Pre-eclampsia (0.87 per 100 000 live births, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-1.02) was the most common cause of maternal death in 2018-2022, when cause-of-death assignment was based on the underlying cause of death. Amniotic fluid embolism and cardiomyopathy tied for second rank, haemorrhage placed fourth and puerperal sepsis and uterine rupture tied for the fifth rank. Rankings based on multiple causes of death showed a different pattern: haemorrhage (1.13 per 100 000 live births, 95% CI 0.98-1.29) was the most common cause, followed by pre-eclampsia, cardiomyopathy, amniotic fluid embolism, puerperal sepsis and uterine rupture. There was no significant correlation between the cause-of-maternal death rankings based on the underlying and multiple causes of death (correlation coefficient 0.62, 95% CI-0.39, 0.95; p value 0.19) in 2018-2022. Cause-of-death rankings were significantly correlated under the two methods of cause-of-death assignment in 1999-2002 (correlation coefficient 0.83, 95% CI 0.05, 0.98; p value 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Basing cause-of-death assignment and ranking of the causes of maternal death using a multiple causes-of-death approach may better inform clinical and public health priorities for reducing maternal mortality.

摘要

目的

基于潜在死因与多种死因来研究孕产妇死亡原因归类的差异。

设计

基于人群的横断面研究。

地点

美国,1999 - 2002年及2018 - 2022年。

研究对象

1999 - 2002年的1633例孕产妇死亡病例以及2018 - 2022年的1929例孕产妇死亡病例。

方法

根据潜在死因以及多种死因来确定死亡原因。对六种选定的产科死因的发生频率进行量化和排序。

结果

2018 - 2022年,当根据潜在死因进行死因归类时,子痫前期(每10万例活产中有0.87例,95%置信区间[CI]为0.74 - 1.02)是孕产妇死亡的最常见原因。羊水栓塞和心肌病并列第二,出血位列第四,产褥期败血症和子宫破裂并列第五。基于多种死因的排序呈现出不同模式:出血(每10万例活产中有1.13例,95% CI为0.98 - 1.29)是最常见原因,其次是子痫前期、心肌病、羊水栓塞、产褥期败血症和子宫破裂。2018 - 2022年,基于潜在死因和多种死因的孕产妇死亡原因排序之间无显著相关性(相关系数0.62,95% CI为 - 0.39,0.95;p值0.19)。1999 - 2002年,在两种死因归类方法下,死因排序具有显著相关性(相关系数0.83,95% CI为0.05,0.98;p值0.04)。

结论

采用多种死因方法进行死因归类和孕产妇死亡原因排序,可能会为降低孕产妇死亡率的临床和公共卫生重点工作提供更好的参考依据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验