Suppr超能文献

死亡原因分析:方法与实践综述。

Analysis of Multiple Causes of Death: A Review of Methods and Practices.

机构信息

From the National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University.

Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra, Australia.

出版信息

Epidemiology. 2023 May 1;34(3):333-344. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001597. Epub 2023 Jan 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Research and reporting of mortality indicators typically focus on a single underlying cause of death selected from multiple causes recorded on a death certificate. The need to incorporate the multiple causes in mortality statistics-reflecting increasing multimorbidity and complex causation patterns-is recognized internationally. This review aims to identify and appraise relevant analytical methods and practices related to multiple causes.

METHODS

We searched Medline, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from their incept ion to December 2020 without language restrictions, supplemented by consultation with international experts. Eligible articles analyzed multiple causes of death from death certificates. The process identified 4,080 items of which we reviewed 434 full-text articles.

RESULTS

Most articles we reviewed (76%, n = 332) were published since 2001. The majority of articles examined mortality by "any- mention" of the cause of death (87%, n = 377) and assessed pairwise combinations of causes (57%, n = 245). Since 2001, applications of methods emerged to group deaths based on common cause patterns using, for example, cluster analysis (2%, n = 9), and application of multiple-cause weights to re-evaluate mortality burden (1%, n = 5). We describe multiple-cause methods applied to specific research objectives for approaches emerging recently.

CONCLUSION

This review confirms rapidly increasing international interest in the analysis of multiple causes of death and provides the most comprehensive overview, to our knowledge, of methods and practices to date. Available multiple-cause methods are diverse but suit a range of research objectives. With greater availability of data and technology, these could be further developed and applied across a range of settings.

摘要

背景

研究和报告死亡率指标通常侧重于从死亡证明上记录的多个死因中选择一个单一的根本死因。国际上认识到需要将多种死因纳入死亡率统计数据中,以反映日益增加的多病共存和复杂的病因模式。本综述旨在确定和评估与多种死因相关的分析方法和实践。

方法

我们在 2020 年 12 月之前没有语言限制地在 Medline、PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science 上进行了搜索,并补充了与国际专家的咨询。合格的文章分析了死亡证明上的多种死因。该过程确定了 4080 项,我们对其中的 434 篇全文文章进行了审查。

结果

我们审查的大多数文章(76%,n=332)都是在 2001 年以后发表的。大多数文章通过“任何死因提及”(87%,n=377)来检查死亡率,并评估死因的两两组合(57%,n=245)。自 2001 年以来,出现了一些应用方法来根据共同的死因模式对死亡进行分组,例如聚类分析(2%,n=9),以及应用多死因权重来重新评估死亡率负担(1%,n=5)。我们描述了应用于特定研究目标的多死因方法,这些方法是最近出现的。

结论

本综述证实了国际上对分析多种死因的兴趣迅速增加,并提供了迄今为止对这些方法和实践的最全面概述。现有的多死因方法多种多样,但适合一系列研究目标。随着数据和技术的可用性增加,这些方法可以在各种环境中得到进一步开发和应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de46/10069753/33a6a8cfd4ec/ede-34-333-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验