Suppr超能文献

机器人立体定向辅助治疗脑出血的疗效和安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Efficacy and safety of The Robotic Stereotactic Assistance for intracerebral hemorrhage; A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Elfakhrany Mohamed Diaa, Al-Dardery Nada Mostafa, Khaled Sadil Mohammad Bani, El-Samahy Mohamed, Alqato Shahd, Abdelsattar Ahmed Taha, Abouzid Mohamed

机构信息

Neurosurgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt.

Faculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt.

出版信息

Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Jul 28;48(1):582. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03735-3.

Abstract

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a critical medical condition associated with a high mortality rate. Surgical evacuation of extensive hemorrhage can improve survival and functional outcomes, but deep brain location poses a challenge. Our study seeks to provide robust evidence highlighting the efficacy, safety, and contribution of Robotic Stereotactic Assistance (ROSA) in advancing neurosurgical practices in the evacuation of ICH compared to conventional treatment methods. We searched for relevant papers comparing ROSA with conventional treatments until October 2024, using four electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The analysis was done using R Software. Continuous data was pooled as mean difference (MD), and dichotomous data was pooled as odds ratio (OR) in a random effect model with a relative 95% CI. A sub-group analysis was conducted according to the type of conventional therapy and the site of the hemorrhage. Eleven studies, comprising 968 patients (478 in the ROSA group and 490 in the control group "non-ROSA"), were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The analysis of primary outcomes revealed significantly higher postoperative Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores, MD of 1.80 (95% CI: 0.68 to 2.92; p < 0.01), and lower rebleeding rates, OR of 0.26 (95% CI: 0.10 to 0.66; p < 0.01). However, no significant difference in mortality was found between the two groups, with an OR of 0.38 (95% CI: 0.11 to 1.38; p = 0.14). Regarding secondary outcomes, the ROSA group significantly reduced surgery duration and decreased intracranial infections and pneumonia. No significant difference was observed between the groups concerning central hypothermia. Using the ROSA robotic system for ICH evacuation is associated with improved neurological outcomes. These findings highlight the potential benefits of ROSA in advancing neurological practices for the management of ICH.

摘要

脑出血(ICH)是一种死亡率很高的严重病症。广泛出血的手术清除可提高生存率和功能预后,但深部脑区定位是一项挑战。我们的研究旨在提供有力证据,突出与传统治疗方法相比,机器人立体定向辅助(ROSA)在推进脑出血清除神经外科手术实践中的疗效、安全性和贡献。我们使用四个电子数据库:PubMed、Scopus、Cochrane图书馆和Web of Science,搜索了截至2024年10月比较ROSA与传统治疗的相关论文。分析使用R软件进行。连续数据合并为平均差(MD),二分数据在随机效应模型中合并为比值比(OR),相对95%置信区间。根据传统治疗类型和出血部位进行亚组分析。系统评价和荟萃分析纳入了11项研究,共968例患者(ROSA组478例,对照组“非ROSA”组490例)。主要结局分析显示,术后格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分显著更高,MD为1.80(95%置信区间:0.68至2.92;p<0.01),再出血率更低,OR为0.26(95%置信区间:0.10至0.66;p<0.01)。然而,两组之间的死亡率没有显著差异,OR为0.38(95%置信区间:0.11至1.38;p=0.14)。关于次要结局,ROSA组显著缩短了手术时间,降低了颅内感染和肺炎的发生率。两组在中枢性低温方面没有观察到显著差异。使用ROSA机器人系统进行脑出血清除与改善神经功能结局相关。这些发现突出了ROSA在推进脑出血管理神经外科实践中的潜在益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47bf/12304042/cdb3b42906d9/10143_2025_3735_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验