Devita Maria, Ravelli Adele, Panzeri Anna, Castaldo Anna, Arioli Maria, Olivito Giusi, Berardi Angela, Miscioscia Alessandro, Ferrari Chiara, Siciliano Libera, Mariotti Caterina, De Rui Marina, Ghisi Marta, Cattaneo Zaira, Sergi Giuseppe, Mapelli Daniela, Leggio Maria
Department of General Psychology (DPG), University of Padua, via venezia 8, Padova, 35131, Italy.
Geriatrics Unit, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Padova, 35128, Italy.
Cerebellum. 2025 Jul 28;24(5):138. doi: 10.1007/s12311-025-01878-z.
The Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome (CCAS), also known as Schmahmann's syndrome, is increasingly recognized for its impact on cognitive and emotional functioning yet remains underdiagnosed. This study aimed to standardize the CCAS-Scale (CCAS-S) in the Italian population, enhancing its methodological and statistical validity.
A total of 671 healthy Italian volunteers (mean age = 46.19 years with SD 18.47, 58.88% females), were recruited from various geographical, educational and social backgrounds. Participants were assessed using the CCAS-S, alongside the Cognitive Reserve Index questionnaire, Raven's Colored Progressive Matrices and the Mini-Mental State Examination to ensure a comprehensive assessment and establish convergent validity. Moreover, the parallel CCAS-S version B was administered to 51 individuals.
Statistical analyses on the Italian version of the CCAS-S revealed strong psychometric properties. Internal consistency was confirmed with Cronbach's alpha values of 0.70 and 0.74 for parallel forms A and B. Construct validity was supported by a moderate-to-high correlation (r = 0.453) with the Mini-Mental State Examination, suggesting both scales are related yet measure different cognitive functions, with the CCAS-S focusing on executive functions. Test-retest and inter-rater reliability were optimal (ICC = 0.902 and 0.989, respectively). Minimal practice effects were observed after 1 to 3 months, with further validation achieved using parallel version B.
The present work provides the first Italian standardization of CCAS-S. The results highlight the necessity for increased awareness and recognition of CCAS in clinical settings, advocating for the integration of the CCAS-S into routine assessments to improve diagnostic accuracy and patient care.
小脑认知情感综合征(CCAS),也被称为施马曼综合征,因其对认知和情感功能的影响日益受到认可,但仍未得到充分诊断。本研究旨在使CCAS量表(CCAS-S)在意大利人群中标准化,提高其方法学和统计学效度。
共招募了671名健康的意大利志愿者(平均年龄=46.19岁,标准差18.47,女性占58.88%),他们来自不同的地理、教育和社会背景。使用CCAS-S对参与者进行评估,同时使用认知储备指数问卷、瑞文彩色渐进矩阵测验和简易精神状态检查表,以确保进行全面评估并建立收敛效度。此外,还对51名个体施测了平行的CCAS-S版本B。
对CCAS-S意大利语版本的统计分析显示出强大的心理测量学特性。平行版本A和B的Cronbach's alpha值分别为0.70和0.74,证实了内部一致性。与简易精神状态检查表的中度至高度相关性(r = 0.453)支持了结构效度,表明两个量表相关但测量不同的认知功能,CCAS-S侧重于执行功能。重测信度和评分者间信度最佳(ICC分别为0.902和0.989)。在1至3个月后观察到最小的练习效应,并使用平行版本B进一步验证。
本研究首次对CCAS-S进行了意大利语标准化。结果强调了在临床环境中提高对CCAS的认识和识别的必要性,主张将CCAS-S纳入常规评估以提高诊断准确性和患者护理水平。