• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小脑认知情感/施马曼综合征量表的意大利标准化:健康异质人群的认知剖析

The Italian Standardization of the Cerebellar Cognitive Affective/Schmahmann Syndrome Scale: Cognitive Profiling in a Healthy, Heterogeneous Population.

作者信息

Devita Maria, Ravelli Adele, Panzeri Anna, Castaldo Anna, Arioli Maria, Olivito Giusi, Berardi Angela, Miscioscia Alessandro, Ferrari Chiara, Siciliano Libera, Mariotti Caterina, De Rui Marina, Ghisi Marta, Cattaneo Zaira, Sergi Giuseppe, Mapelli Daniela, Leggio Maria

机构信息

Department of General Psychology (DPG), University of Padua, via venezia 8, Padova, 35131, Italy.

Geriatrics Unit, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Padova, 35128, Italy.

出版信息

Cerebellum. 2025 Jul 28;24(5):138. doi: 10.1007/s12311-025-01878-z.

DOI:10.1007/s12311-025-01878-z
PMID:40719962
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome (CCAS), also known as Schmahmann's syndrome, is increasingly recognized for its impact on cognitive and emotional functioning yet remains underdiagnosed. This study aimed to standardize the CCAS-Scale (CCAS-S) in the Italian population, enhancing its methodological and statistical validity.

METHODS

A total of 671 healthy Italian volunteers (mean age = 46.19 years with SD 18.47, 58.88% females), were recruited from various geographical, educational and social backgrounds. Participants were assessed using the CCAS-S, alongside the Cognitive Reserve Index questionnaire, Raven's Colored Progressive Matrices and the Mini-Mental State Examination to ensure a comprehensive assessment and establish convergent validity. Moreover, the parallel CCAS-S version B was administered to 51 individuals.

RESULTS

Statistical analyses on the Italian version of the CCAS-S revealed strong psychometric properties. Internal consistency was confirmed with Cronbach's alpha values of 0.70 and 0.74 for parallel forms A and B. Construct validity was supported by a moderate-to-high correlation (r = 0.453) with the Mini-Mental State Examination, suggesting both scales are related yet measure different cognitive functions, with the CCAS-S focusing on executive functions. Test-retest and inter-rater reliability were optimal (ICC = 0.902 and 0.989, respectively). Minimal practice effects were observed after 1 to 3 months, with further validation achieved using parallel version B.

CONCLUSIONS

The present work provides the first Italian standardization of CCAS-S. The results highlight the necessity for increased awareness and recognition of CCAS in clinical settings, advocating for the integration of the CCAS-S into routine assessments to improve diagnostic accuracy and patient care.

摘要

引言

小脑认知情感综合征(CCAS),也被称为施马曼综合征,因其对认知和情感功能的影响日益受到认可,但仍未得到充分诊断。本研究旨在使CCAS量表(CCAS-S)在意大利人群中标准化,提高其方法学和统计学效度。

方法

共招募了671名健康的意大利志愿者(平均年龄=46.19岁,标准差18.47,女性占58.88%),他们来自不同的地理、教育和社会背景。使用CCAS-S对参与者进行评估,同时使用认知储备指数问卷、瑞文彩色渐进矩阵测验和简易精神状态检查表,以确保进行全面评估并建立收敛效度。此外,还对51名个体施测了平行的CCAS-S版本B。

结果

对CCAS-S意大利语版本的统计分析显示出强大的心理测量学特性。平行版本A和B的Cronbach's alpha值分别为0.70和0.74,证实了内部一致性。与简易精神状态检查表的中度至高度相关性(r = 0.453)支持了结构效度,表明两个量表相关但测量不同的认知功能,CCAS-S侧重于执行功能。重测信度和评分者间信度最佳(ICC分别为0.902和0.989)。在1至3个月后观察到最小的练习效应,并使用平行版本B进一步验证。

结论

本研究首次对CCAS-S进行了意大利语标准化。结果强调了在临床环境中提高对CCAS的认识和识别的必要性,主张将CCAS-S纳入常规评估以提高诊断准确性和患者护理水平。

相似文献

1
The Italian Standardization of the Cerebellar Cognitive Affective/Schmahmann Syndrome Scale: Cognitive Profiling in a Healthy, Heterogeneous Population.小脑认知情感/施马曼综合征量表的意大利标准化:健康异质人群的认知剖析
Cerebellum. 2025 Jul 28;24(5):138. doi: 10.1007/s12311-025-01878-z.
2
The Cerebellar Cognitive Affective/Schmahmann Syndrome Scale: Updates and Insights.小脑认知情感/施马曼综合征量表:更新与见解
Cerebellum. 2025 Jul 23;24(5):136. doi: 10.1007/s12311-025-01890-3.
3
[Cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome and vertebrobasilar ischemia. From cerebello-cerebral diaschisis to "dysmetria of thought"].[小脑认知情感综合征与椎基底动脉缺血。从小脑-大脑交叉性机能缺失到“思维辨距不良”]
Psychiatriki. 2024 Sep 18. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2024.012.
4
Validation of the cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome (CCAS) scale in CCAS patients and cerebellar controls.小脑认知情感综合征(CCAS)量表在CCAS患者和小脑对照中的验证。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2025 Jul 14:1-11. doi: 10.1017/S1355617725101033.
5
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Dynamic Evaluation of Motor Speech Skill (DEMSS-TR) Test for Children With Speech Sound Disorders.土耳其语版运动性言语技能动态评估(DEMSS-TR)测试对语音障碍儿童的有效性和可靠性
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Jul-Aug;60(4):e70067. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70067.
6
Turkish Version of the Video-Naming Test for Assessing Verb Anomia (DVAQ-30): Normative Data for the Adult Turkish Population and Validation Study in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease.用于评估动词失命名症的视频命名测试的土耳其语版本(DVAQ - 30):土耳其成年人群的常模数据以及在轻度认知障碍和阿尔茨海默病中的效度研究
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Jul-Aug;60(4):e70068. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70068.
7
Evaluating the Construct Validity and Sensitivity to Change of the Klenico Depression Domain in Psychotherapeutic Inpatient Care: Instrument Validation Study.评估心理治疗住院护理中Klenico抑郁领域的结构效度和对变化的敏感性:工具验证研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jul 24;9:e50504. doi: 10.2196/50504.
8
Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in the Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial.小脑经颅直流电刺激治疗小脑认知情感综合征:一项随机、双盲、假刺激对照试验
Mov Disord. 2025 Jan;40(1):121-131. doi: 10.1002/mds.30043. Epub 2024 Nov 2.
9
Italian validation of the credibility/expectancy questionnaire in spinal pain: a useful tool for clinicians and physiotherapist (CEQ-I).意大利对脊柱疼痛可信度/预期问卷的验证:临床医生和物理治疗师的有用工具(CEQ-I)
Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2025 Jun 21;16:20406223251324812. doi: 10.1177/20406223251324812. eCollection 2025.
10
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Validation to Brazilian Portuguese of the Cerebellar Cognitive Affective/Schmahmann Syndrome Scale.小脑认知情感/施马曼综合征量表的翻译、跨文化调适及巴西葡萄牙语验证
Cerebellum. 2023 Apr;22(2):282-294. doi: 10.1007/s12311-022-01391-7. Epub 2022 Mar 19.
2
Mapping the Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome in Patients with Chronic Cerebellar Strokes.绘制慢性小脑性脑卒中患者的小脑认知情感综合征图谱。
Cerebellum. 2022 Apr;21(2):208-218. doi: 10.1007/s12311-021-01290-3. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
3
The cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome scale reveals early neuropsychological deficits in SCA3 patients.
小脑认知情感综合征量表揭示 SCA3 患者的早期神经认知缺陷。
J Neurol. 2021 Sep;268(9):3456-3466. doi: 10.1007/s00415-021-10516-7. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
4
Reply: Reference values for the Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome Scale: age and education matter.回复:小脑认知情感综合征量表的参考值:年龄和教育程度很重要。
Brain. 2021 Mar 3;144(2):e21. doi: 10.1093/brain/awaa419.
5
Consensus Paper: Cerebellum and Social Cognition.共识文件:小脑与社会认知。
Cerebellum. 2020 Dec;19(6):833-868. doi: 10.1007/s12311-020-01155-1.
6
The Cerebellar Cognitive Affective/Schmahmann Syndrome: a Task Force Paper.小脑认知情感/施马曼综合征:一个工作组文件。
Cerebellum. 2020 Feb;19(1):102-125. doi: 10.1007/s12311-019-01068-8.
7
The cerebellum and cognition.小脑与认知。
Neurosci Lett. 2019 Jan 1;688:62-75. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2018.07.005. Epub 2018 Jul 8.
8
The cerebellar cognitive affective/Schmahmann syndrome scale.小脑认知情感/Schmahmann 综合征量表。
Brain. 2018 Jan 1;141(1):248-270. doi: 10.1093/brain/awx317.
9
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.可靠性研究中组内相关系数选择与报告指南
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
10
Cognitive Reserve Index questionnaire (CRIq): a new instrument for measuring cognitive reserve.认知储备指数问卷(CRIq):一种用于测量认知储备的新工具。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2012 Jun;24(3):218-26. doi: 10.3275/7800. Epub 2011 Jun 20.