• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食品安全网络舆情生成研究——以中国鼠头鸭脖事件为例

Research on the generation of food safety network public opinion-Taking the Chinese Mouse Head Duck Neck Incident as an example.

作者信息

Yang Wei, Pei Jiayin, Lin Zheyu

机构信息

School of Business, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu Province, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jul 28;20(7):e0324876. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324876. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0324876
PMID:40720389
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12303279/
Abstract

In recent years, the frequent occurrence of food safety incidents has posed a serious threat to people's lives and properties, and triggered heated discussions in the whole society. If the relevant departments shirk each other's responsibilities or deceive the public in handling the incident, it will further lead to the generation of network public opinion, which will have an impact on the stability of the society and the credibility of the government. In order to study the generation of food safety network public opinion, this article takes the sudden "mouse head and duck neck" incident in a university in Jiangxi Province, China as an example, and combines text mining with grounded theory. Firstly, the LDA topic clustering model is used to identify six main concerns (topics) of the public during the public opinion period, and the topic words and words with high TF-IDF values under each topic is counted. Based on this, the grounded theory method is used for three-level coding, and then a network public opinion generation model is constructed. It was found that the four main categories of national subjects, public's responses, value orientations, and news media play an important role in the generation process of network public opinion. These findings not only provide a reference for the governance of food safety public opinion in China, but also shed light on public opinion management in other countries, especially when responding to food safety incidents of general significance.

摘要

近年来,食品安全事件频发,对人民生命财产构成严重威胁,引发全社会热议。若相关部门在处理事件时相互推诿或欺骗公众,将进一步引发网络舆情,影响社会稳定和政府公信力。为研究食品安全网络舆情的生成,本文以我国江西省某高校突发的“鼠头鸭脖”事件为例,将文本挖掘与扎根理论相结合。首先,利用LDA主题聚类模型识别舆情期间公众的六大主要关注点(主题),并统计各主题下的主题词及TF-IDF值较高的词汇。在此基础上,运用扎根理论方法进行三级编码,进而构建网络舆情生成模型。研究发现,国家主体、公众反应、价值取向和新闻媒体四大类在网络舆情生成过程中发挥着重要作用。这些研究结果不仅为我国食品安全舆情治理提供参考,也为其他国家的舆情管理提供启示,尤其是在应对具有普遍意义的食品安全事件时。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a301/12303279/2924cea613b4/pone.0324876.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a301/12303279/c61bda91cb98/pone.0324876.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a301/12303279/39eb050757c1/pone.0324876.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a301/12303279/5a488654c65d/pone.0324876.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a301/12303279/5474775ec6a2/pone.0324876.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a301/12303279/1f0c23866a5e/pone.0324876.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a301/12303279/50deac54d3b0/pone.0324876.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a301/12303279/4ed7beb00b8e/pone.0324876.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a301/12303279/2924cea613b4/pone.0324876.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a301/12303279/c61bda91cb98/pone.0324876.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a301/12303279/39eb050757c1/pone.0324876.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a301/12303279/5a488654c65d/pone.0324876.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a301/12303279/5474775ec6a2/pone.0324876.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a301/12303279/1f0c23866a5e/pone.0324876.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a301/12303279/50deac54d3b0/pone.0324876.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a301/12303279/4ed7beb00b8e/pone.0324876.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a301/12303279/2924cea613b4/pone.0324876.g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Research on the generation of food safety network public opinion-Taking the Chinese Mouse Head Duck Neck Incident as an example.食品安全网络舆情生成研究——以中国鼠头鸭脖事件为例
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 28;20(7):e0324876. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324876. eCollection 2025.
2
The quantity, quality and findings of network meta-analyses evaluating the effectiveness of GLP-1 RAs for weight loss: a scoping review.评估胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)减肥效果的网状Meta分析的数量、质量及结果:一项范围综述
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jun 25:1-73. doi: 10.3310/SKHT8119.
3
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
4
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
8
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍
9
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
10
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring Food Safety Emergency Incidents on Sina Weibo: Using Text Mining and Sentiment Evolution.探索新浪微博上的食品安全突发事件:运用文本挖掘与情感演变
J Food Prot. 2025 Jan 2;88(1):100418. doi: 10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100418. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
2
Research on online public opinion dissemination and emergency countermeasures of food safety in universities-take the rat head and duck neck incident in China as an example.高校食品安全网络舆情传播与应急对策研究——以中国“鼠头鸭脖”事件为例。
Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 1;11:1346577. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1346577. eCollection 2023.
3
Impact of COVID-19 on foodborne illness in Africa - A perspective piece.
新冠疫情对非洲食源性疾病的影响——一篇观点文章。
J Infect Public Health. 2023 May;16(5):651-659. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2023.02.018. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
4
Analysis of network public opinion on COVID-19 epidemic based on the WSR theory.基于 WSR 理论的 COVID-19 疫情网络舆情分析
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 13;10:1104031. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1104031. eCollection 2022.
5
Using Grounded Theory to Identify Online Public Opinion in China to Improve Risk Management-The Case of COVID-19.运用扎根理论识别中国网络舆情以改善风险管理——以 COVID-19 为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 10;19(22):14754. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192214754.
6
New media platform's understanding of Chinese social workers' anti-epidemic actions: an analysis of network public opinion based on COVID-19.新媒体平台对中国社会工作者抗疫行动的认知:基于 COVID-19 的网络舆情分析。
Soc Work Public Health. 2021 Nov 17;36(7-8):770-785. doi: 10.1080/19371918.2021.1954127. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
7
Modeling Network Public Opinion Propagation with the Consideration of Individual Emotions.考虑个体情绪的网络舆情传播建模。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 14;17(18):6681. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186681.
8
An Analysis of Public Opinions Regarding Take-Away Food Safety: A 2015-2018 Case Study on Sina Weibo.关于外卖食品安全的公众舆论分析:2015 - 2018年新浪微博案例研究
Foods. 2020 Apr 18;9(4):511. doi: 10.3390/foods9040511.