Stansfield Claire, Kneale Dylan, Edwards Rachael C
Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Coordinating (EPPI) Centre, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 28;20(7):e0328996. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328996. eCollection 2025.
Embedded researcher interventions endeavour to facilitate culture changes in the production and use of research, so that research is contextually relevant for informing local policies and practices. However, the daily life of embedded researchers is poorly understood, as is their perceptions of working in a role intersecting research with local government settings. An embedded researcher intervention across English local authority public health teams provided an opportunity to understand what happens within these roles and which activities are undertaken. We describe the findings from a daily diary survey completed by embedded researchers for one week over two waves, comprising open-ended and closed questions (Nine participants in wave 1, of which five completed wave 2). Free-form entries were thematised using template analysis and quantitative data analysed through descriptive statistics. The diaries provided a valuable snapshot into a varied working life. Activities included: attending meetings; organising or requesting information; presenting evidence and data-preparation; collecting or analysing data; and providing information or research expertise. Embedded researchers require strong relational skills to collaborate with stakeholders in academia, community, local government and research funders on a range of topics. Participants reported both feelings of satisfaction and disappointment, and some described isolation. There was positive expectation that their activities gradually enhance useful public health research, though require time and system changes. Embedded researchers require support from stakeholders at all levels to maximise the potential benefits of their roles.
嵌入式研究人员干预旨在促进研究成果产出及应用过程中的文化变革,从而使研究与实际情况相关联,为地方政策和实践提供参考依据。然而,人们对嵌入式研究人员的日常生活以及他们对在研究与地方政府环境交叉角色中工作的认知了解甚少。一项针对英国地方当局公共卫生团队的嵌入式研究人员干预提供了一个契机,以了解这些角色中发生了什么以及开展了哪些活动。我们描述了嵌入式研究人员在两波调查中连续一周完成的每日日记调查结果,调查包括开放式和封闭式问题(第一波有9名参与者,其中5人完成了第二波调查)。自由形式的记录通过模板分析进行主题化处理,定量数据则通过描述性统计进行分析。这些日记提供了对多样工作生活的宝贵快照。活动包括:参加会议;整理或索要信息;展示证据和进行数据准备;收集或分析数据;以及提供信息或研究专业知识。嵌入式研究人员需要很强的人际关系技巧,以便就一系列主题与学术界、社区、地方政府和研究资助者的利益相关者进行合作。参与者既报告了满意感也报告了失望感,一些人还描述了孤独感。尽管需要时间和系统变革,但人们对他们的活动将逐步加强有益的公共卫生研究抱有积极期望。嵌入式研究人员需要各级利益相关者的支持,以最大限度地发挥其角色的潜在益处。